StarGateWars Forums

Moriarty wrote:

Norbe wrote:Zeon, you are thinking backwards. You claim you will be forced to quit? Put yourself in the place of those you attacked.

What is the point in playing if everytime you build something you are randomly massed by people with big accounts that you have never had any form of interaction with?

The cycle of thought goes like this:
I, smaller player, want to build. I build.
You, bigger player in alliance who i've not spoken to, masses me.
I lose my stuff, cry, and rebuild.
You bigger player, randomly mass again.
--Repeat Ad infinitum --
I quit.

That has happened so many times to so many players. And it is exactly what you did when you went around massing people with no reason.

Once again, you started this. His reaction is admirable. He's taken a tough stance and has made sure you are aware of the consequences of your actions. I am very very glad you are getting what you deserve for picking on random players, who you only attacked because you thought they posed no threat.

There is no shame in admitting you have done wrong, which you have.

~Norbe~

Have you seen Ben's lack of stats??? The LACK of building is hilarious. He is letting other players who he doesn't even know, or care to know do his work. have fun never being thanked by a selfish individual Les, Ark, etc!!!

BenHur wrote:

Moriarty wrote:

Norbe wrote:Zeon, you are thinking backwards. You claim you will be forced to quit? Put yourself in the place of those you attacked.

What is the point in playing if everytime you build something you are randomly massed by people with big accounts that you have never had any form of interaction with?

The cycle of thought goes like this:
I, smaller player, want to build. I build.
You, bigger player in alliance who i've not spoken to, masses me.
I lose my stuff, cry, and rebuild
You bigger player, randomly mass again.
--Repeat Ad infinitum --
I quit.

That has happened so many times to so many players. And it is exactly what you did when you went around massing people with no reason.

Once again, you started this. His reaction is admirable. He's taken a tough stance and has made sure you are aware of the consequences of your actions. I am very very glad you are getting what you deserve for picking on random players, who you only attacked because you thought they posed no threat.

There is no shame in admitting you have done wrong, which you have.

~Norbe~

Have you seen Ben's lack of stats??? The LACK of building is hilarious. He is letting other players who he doesn't even know, or care to know do his work. have fun never being thanked by a selfish individual Les, Ark, etc!!!

you mean this is end and i thanks to all that you can continue in peace?

Moriarty wrote:I admit.... And you can put this in stone (players doing someone else's job)

I shouldn't have had the alliance execute a random massing (but it happened.. tough). I have learned my lesson, doesn't mean this isn't over. I feel it will last some time

AND I shouldn't have aired out that we were executing a random massing spree (but it happened.. tough)

Sorry Ben, but obviously your loses (however small, since you don't build in war) will not be repaid. At least he and I are chatting about things, however trivial. Till then, I await the nay sayers to continue stalking me. I admire your increase in my popularity

Love, James

Moriarty wrote:Man, if language to English and garmamar they were a... thing

Arkenius wrote:Brave on the forum and hiding behind ppt in main. What happened, Moriarty? Lost the will to fight?

Or are you preparing another 2T def + 30mil spies ratio for me? Right now you're just plain stupid and asking for it. Let's see how your alliance handles a few weeks of this because of an incompetent leader.

How many 40q defences can Lektius rebuild in ascend? Let's test it.

Moriarty wrote:

Arkenius wrote:Brave on the forum and hiding behind ppt in main. What happened, Moriarty? Lost the will to fight?

Or are you preparing another 2T def + 30mil spies ratio for me? Right now you're just plain stupid and asking for it. Let's see how your alliance handles a few weeks of this because of an incompetent leader.

How many 40q defences can Lektius rebuild in ascend? Let's test it.

You don't build in main...

I PPT'd for alliance, not for myself, doesn't mean I won't enjoy it.

Incompetence is a strong word... Yes my alliance is losing much, but it comes back: UU, naq, turns, ascension status (Not to mention I repay much of our loses). So why bother chickening out when you are afraid to lose anything in main? We're only fighting your ascended anyway, and I'm sure there are some hungry players on my behalf that are wanting to get their hands a little dirtier...

BenHur wrote:

Moriarty wrote:

Arkenius wrote:Brave on the forum and hiding behind ppt in main. What happened, Moriarty? Lost the will to fight?

Or are you preparing another 2T def + 30mil spies ratio for me? Right now you're just plain stupid and asking for it. Let's see how your alliance handles a few weeks of this because of an incompetent leader.

How many 40q defences can Lektius rebuild in ascend? Let's test it.

You don't build in main...

I PPT'd for alliance, not for myself, doesn't mean I won't enjoy it.

Incompetence is a strong word... Yes my alliance is losing much, but it comes back: UU, naq, turns, ascension status (Not to mention I repay much of our loses). So why bother chickening out when you are afraid to lose anything in main? We're only fighting your ascended anyway, and I'm sure there are some hungry players on my behalf that are wanting to get their hands a little dirtier...

*James Moriarty BenHur No Subject 11:19

Any loses I would honestly even consider about repaying, would just be the 9T. NO more. But I\'m not there yet.

9t def cost much more
and you sab my attack weapons too

Moriarty wrote:
You don't build in main...

Moriarty wrote:By my earlier message of saying "9T" I did mean the 9T def. Don't be naïve