StarGateWars Forums

Mr Mystake wrote:

Nuto vixen wrote:

Almost38 wrote:why delete the poll you werent complain when 'yes' was winning

It's not a race. The poll was set up to see who was happy and who wasn't and its now been spoiled and tainted.

Those who have an opinion shouldn't be to scared to voice it.

The only opinion poll that should be taken seriously here is the posting one, not the poll.

Where's your proof that it was tainted? It's only tainted because its not going your way.

Seems to me that I have presented you with my proof.
So where is your proof that it WASNT tainted by people like you?

Cry yourself a river.

I cannot believe you are meant to be representing a forum that you clearly are not in touch with at all.

Borek wrote:

Almost38 wrote:

Nuto vixen wrote:

Almost38 wrote:why delete the poll you werent complain when 'yes' was winning

It's not a race. The poll was set up to see who was happy and who wasn't and its now been spoiled and tainted.

Cause your side is losing you mean. waaa waaa waaaaaa

Don't see how we've lost, last time i checked Tok'Ra was still perma-banned and that crying picture could just as easily be used to poke fun at you lot.

Like thats ever stopped him ?

Nuto vixen wrote:

Mr Mystake wrote:

Nuto vixen wrote:

Almost38 wrote:why delete the poll you werent complain when 'yes' was winning

It's not a race. The poll was set up to see who was happy and who wasn't and its now been spoiled and tainted.

Those who have an opinion shouldn't be to scared to voice it.

The only opinion poll that should be taken seriously here is the posting one, not the poll.

Where's your proof that it was tainted? It's only tainted because its not going your way.

Seems to me that I have presented you with my proof.
So where is your proof that it WASNT tainted by people like you?

Cry yourself a river.

I cannot believe you are meant to be representing a forum that you clearly are not in touch with at all.

did you here us complaining when it wasnt? no ur just mad cause you were wrong get over it

go to court and say "he did this and that"

u gotta prove it, lol


ur only proof is "ive seen this and that"

big shot over here with the evidence box.

YOU, need to GTHO. There is no concrete evidence to support your claims. Its not our job to prove you wrong, its your job to prove yourself right, you can claim all u want

but this is a post tits or GTHO situation,
post actual evidence not just what uve seen, or GTHO.

Borek wrote:
Lets just leave the kids to mourn Nuto, lol, i'm just happy he's gone and hope jason doesn't lapse like last time and let him back.

Good call Borek

Nuto vixen wrote:Seems to me that I have presented you with my proof.
So where is your proof that it WASNT tainted by people like you?

Cry yourself a river.

I cannot believe you are meant to be representing a forum that you clearly are not in touch with at all.

It sounds more like Wishful Thinking on your part Nuto. There's no way to prove one way or the other WHO used the multi accounts. So you're still attacking the people rather than the argument.

Jake

bladeswin wrote:

Nuto vixen wrote:Seems to me that I have presented you with my proof.
So where is your proof that it WASNT tainted by people like you?

Cry yourself a river.

I cannot believe you are meant to be representing a forum that you clearly are not in touch with at all.

It sounds more like Wishful Thinking on your part Nuto. There's no way to prove one way or the other WHO used the multi accounts. So you're still attacking the people rather than the argument.

Jake

We're not the ones defending someone banned 3 times, someone who has posted porn and mutilation pics in the past.

Mr Mystake wrote:go to court and say "he did this and that"

u gotta prove it, lol


ur only proof is "ive seen this and that"

big shot over here with the evidence box.

YOU, need to GTHO. There is no concrete evidence to support your claims. Its not our job to prove you wrong, its your job to prove yourself right, you can claim all u want

but this is a post tits or GTHO situation,
post actual evidence not just what uve seen, or GTHO.

a post for tits?

Hey Borek


wheres the proof that Tok'ra was the culprit?


Go ask 420chan for it

Borek wrote:We're not the ones defending someone banned 3 times, someone who has posted porn and mutilation pics in the past.

I'm not defending him, I even MSN messaged him that exact statement. I'm just not happy reading that those in favor of his banning use no more logic than their own opinions on Tok'ra as a human being rather than on actual facts that have been presented. You mention two things that you say occurred in the past. Yet this only appears on page 9 of the comments, while Nuto Vixen's post using opinion hit page 5.

Perhaps it's time for your side of the coin to actually use logic and explanations to support your position. Until there's a logical argument, the only thing you folks have claimed is that he's annoying, which I would hope isn't the criteria for being banned, or I would have to say that many other people would need to be banned, especially if you include Nuto's "dissent" clause as a legit reason. In that case I would be banned as while. And while there are some that wouldn't care, it would be nothing more than a farce.

Jake

bladeswin wrote:

Borek wrote:We're not the ones defending someone banned 3 times, someone who has posted porn and mutilation pics in the past.

I'm not defending him, I even MSN messaged him that exact statement. I'm just not happy reading that those in favor of his banning use no more logic than their own opinions on Tok'ra as a human being rather than on actual facts that have been presented. You mention two things that you say occurred in the past. Yet this only appears on page 9 of the comments, while Nuto Vixen's post using opinion hit page 5.

Perhaps it's time for your side of the coin to actually use logic and explanations to support your position. Until there's a logical argument, the only thing you folks have claimed is that he's annoying, which I would hope isn't the criteria for being banned, or I would have to say that many other people would need to be banned, especially if you include Nuto's "dissent" clause as a legit reason. In that case I would be banned as while. And while there are some that wouldn't care, it would be nothing more than a farce.

Jake

MSN reveals the true self of ppl cause your not obligated with any rules...
srry but thats how it roles...

Considering the last thread you posted in was Wed Oct 17, 2007 4:37 pm "The 'great latenite MSN convo' thread" (take into account my GMT +11), you are not one of to any sort of forum judge.

Where where you for the rest of them?

Moved: I am the bringer of pain (whats wrong with the forum)

Moved: Can the supermods (not all, but some) please grow up ?

Locked: Can the supermods (not all, but some) please grow up ?

Locked: So what do YOU do to keep the game fun ?

Moved: The wordfilter list...........

Locked: Can the supermods (not all, but some) please grow up ?

Locked: DAMNIT SMOOSH!

Moved: IVE FIGURED OUT MOJO RISING

Moved: So SGWs, what music do you listen to ?

Locked: LIberals suck (AKA mods will enforce rules equal or not at

Moved: A mod just scared me

Moved: BIG NEWS FOR HARRY POTTER FANS

Moved: The 'great latenite MSN convo' thread.

At least I'm not attacking people.
That's one thing I can say with pride.
I have only attacked the arguments.

And as for me not being here? Your point is? I have a life.
I go to University classes, participate in clubs, even have a love life.

It STILL doesn't change the fact that the reason you're advocating his banning is because he's annoying, and I can't imagine that being annoying is enough to permaban someone. If it is, then the forum is a bigger monarchy than I thought.

Jake

bladeswin wrote:It STILL doesn't change the fact that the reason you're advocating his banning is because he's annoying, and I can't imagine that being annoying is enough to permaban someone.

Oh, you must have missed this...

I'll re-post.

-Constant spamming of the General section
-Constantly claiming that due to the fact that General section hasn't been "properly defined" to him, that he is no breaking any rules by posting pointless and stupid threads that noone is interested in.
-Constantly trying to make trouble where there otherwise was none.
-Constantly have a stab at either current or former moderators/admins of this forum.
-Constantly bashing his own ideas and opinions on the forum when for the most part people rarely asked for his opinion, nor cared what it was.
-Constantly disrespecting particular forum moderators that he didn't agree with, or like.
-Constantly claiming to be lamb of god/martyr for the right of the forum, when he was in fact the source of most of the forums problems.
-Insisting on defying moderators with the excuse that "there is no rule against it".
-Constantly creating controversial threads to feed his attention addiction and stir trouble up, as well as create mess for the moderators to clean up.
-Constantly creating threads in the inappropriate sections when knowing full well that they were in the inappropriate sections. (again, drawing the "no one has defined the general section" card).

Hopefully this one sinks in.

Picking things apart and adding chocolate sprinkles only works when you haven't been around to witness the mess it makes.

bladeswin wrote:

Borek wrote:We're not the ones defending someone banned 3 times, someone who has posted porn and mutilation pics in the past.

I'm not defending him, I even MSN messaged him that exact statement. I'm just not happy reading that those in favor of his banning use no more logic than their own opinions on Tok'ra as a human being rather than on actual facts that have been presented. You mention two things that you say occurred in the past. Yet this only appears on page 9 of the comments, while Nuto Vixen's post using opinion hit page 5.

Perhaps it's time for your side of the coin to actually use logic and explanations to support your position. Until there's a logical argument, the only thing you folks have claimed is that he's annoying, which I would hope isn't the criteria for being banned, or I would have to say that many other people would need to be banned, especially if you include Nuto's "dissent" clause as a legit reason. In that case I would be banned as while. And while there are some that wouldn't care, it would be nothing more than a farce.

Jake

I base my logic on the fact that i was a mod and got to read most of the stuff in the mods forum, so i actually got to read what Tok'Ra was posting without it being editted for the public. I got to read about all the rule breaking he did, you know, the stuff that you lot gloss over when you talk about how Tok'Ra has helped newbies and encouraged free speech.

Let me tell you for a fact, he has broken every rule on the forum, repeatedly, going as far as posting porn and mutilation and the very best you can come up with is "there's no logic to his banning"??

Please let me pause for a few minutes whilst i stop laughing...

How do you think he got himself 2 perma-bannings in the past? Not by posting complaints about mods i can assure you, although he sure loves to cover up the real reasons for his bannings by complaining about the mods, it's one of his classic strategies.