Page 77 of 104
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 3:16 pm
by KnowLedge
dastupy wrote:Leg Apophis wrote:KnowLedge wrote:**Filtered** Argentina, they are a bunch of cheaterz thats all.
did you guys see the little "fight" at the end during half time?
Not cheaters, I would say however that refering needs to be reformed *cough*video refering*cough*.
Yea that would fix a lot of problems.
Let's send lettters to teh FIFA
Edit: 3-0
i think we shouldn't bring video in. I like tradition. I believe it should be played like its been played for 200 years..
if we bring video in and someone gets headbutted and the ref doesn't see it, then that means the ref can tell the 'third umpire' or the 'ref with video replay' to check if there was a foul.. THis srsly messes up the game play..
+
like i said before, fooling the ref, and taking advantage of the ref is part of the game.. The players should come prepared to exploit this.
as much as i hate what happened to Mexico and England, it really doesn't matter because these things have been happening back when fifa started. Thus if we change the rules now, then we are making a disadvantage to all those who came before us..
for example.. Maradona's handball wouldnt have been a goal and Maradona wouldnt be the same popular man he is now.. you dont mess with Tradition.
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2010 3:25 pm
by GrizzZzzly
Germany!!! whoooo!!!!!
My predictions for tomorrow:
Paraguay 3:1 Japan
Netherlands 3:0 Slovakia
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:18 am
by LegendaryA
There we start, Robben, 1-0!
18'
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:09 am
by Nigatsu_Aka
KnowLedge wrote:[spoiler]
dastupy wrote:Leg Apophis wrote:KnowLedge wrote:**Filtered** Argentina, they are a bunch of cheaterz thats all.
did you guys see the little "fight" at the end during half time?
Not cheaters, I would say however that refering needs to be reformed *cough*video refering*cough*.
Yea that would fix a lot of problems.
Let's send lettters to teh FIFA
Edit: 3-0[/spoiler]
i think we shouldn't bring video in. I like tradition. I believe it should be played like its been played for 200 years..
if we bring video in and someone gets headbutted and the ref doesn't see it, then that means the ref can tell the 'third umpire' or the 'ref with video replay' to check if there was a foul.. THis srsly messes up the game play..
+
like i said before, fooling the ref, and taking advantage of the ref is part of the game.. The players should come prepared to exploit this.
as much as i hate what happened to Mexico and England, it really doesn't matter because these things have been happening back when fifa started. Thus if we change the rules now, then we are making a disadvantage to all those who came before us..
for example.. Maradona's handball wouldnt have been a goal and Maradona wouldnt be the same popular man he is now.. you dont mess with Tradition.
If the referee would have canceled the goal, based on the video replay, that would have been illegal now... because that isn't in the rules... however he would have created a precedent (he had a good chance to enter in the history of football) and i think that FIFA would have considered using video replays.... imo they are useful... anyone watched rugby? But because the referee decided to headbut, i don't think this rule will be discussed anytime soon...
imo, times change, the technology changes... if it makes the game better and more fair play by eliminating the human error then i'm for using it. If they want to insert a microchip in the ball to determine the exact position of the ball (if it had been used already, England this year would have had 2-2 with Germany, Romania would have had 1-1 with Bulgaria in '96 and there are many many more examples of human error of ball being in the goal, but the referee not noticing), then why shouldn't they use video replay?... they introduced the offsaid rule, they used golden and silver goal rule... these changed the football game... the video replay will not change the football, but will make it more fair play... it could eliminate the corruption in football.
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:50 am
by LegendaryA
2-1 final result due to a penalty for Slovakia.
Sneijder scored second goal for the Dutch.
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:02 am
by Thriller
Arlight it'll be nice to watch brazil try for once.
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:07 am
by Juliette
Robben the Glorious.
(What else can you call it? Flame away!)
Brazil will have difficulty with Chile.
I'll laugh regardless of the outcome.
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:21 am
by moses
lts go Chile 
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:43 am
by Nathanael
Germany ! you must kick Argentina
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:48 am
by moses
If Germany loses i give up on this world cup 
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:50 am
by Juliette
Nathanael wrote:Germany ! you must kick Argentina
Udo Jürgens FTW! Wahn-wahn-wahn, größenwahn-wahn..
In any case, as fate would have it, I am unable to watch the current match. >_< Merde.
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:51 am
by moses
who even cares to watch the match gonna be sucha crappy scrappy dirty diveing game highlights and outcome only thing that counts
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:52 am
by Nathanael
lol
I Know Germany can beat Argentina
Oh Michael Ballack....why you must injured ?
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:54 am
by Duderanch
moses of romania wrote:If Germany loses i give up on this world cup
No sure which team I dislike more
Re: 2010 World Cup
Posted: Mon Jun 28, 2010 10:55 am
by moses
