Page 9 of 12

Re: TatkaSmoula vs. red1 minshu

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 8:14 am
by TatkaSmoula[mH]
red1 minshu wrote:Well I'm not stupid tatka why give you things to kill till I am ready to
:smt100

Re: TatkaSmoula vs. red1 minshu

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 8:17 am
by Bioflick
TatkaSmoula[mH] wrote:
red1 minshu wrote:Well I'm not stupid tatka why give you things to kill till I am ready to
:smt100
Why make it easy when you can make it hard?

Re: TatkaSmoula vs. red1 minshu

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 9:15 am
by Tetrismonkey
Guild wrote:
red1 minshu wrote:Well I'm not stupid tatka why give you things to kill till I am ready to
yeap definitely OE then... 8-[
Oh your one to talk. :smt019

Something I can't seem to wrap my head around is why the hell these two could not figure out set rules on there own. Granted, if the DRA was in place during all this, they would need HC approval to begin the war, but the rules themselves would and should always be left to those fighting, not those observing.

None the less, have fun all and enjoy yourselves.

Re: TatkaSmoula vs. red1 minshu

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 1:27 pm
by Loki™
red1 minshu wrote:Well I'm not stupid tatka why give you things to kill till I am ready to
Kill his things at least?

Re: TatkaSmoula vs. red1 minshu

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 5:09 pm
by red1 minshu
Loki™ wrote:
red1 minshu wrote:Well I'm not stupid tatka why give you things to kill till I am ready to
Kill his things at least?
I plan on it thanks Loki

Re: TatkaSmoula vs. red1 minshu

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 5:16 pm
by red1 minshu
and besides what is the point of losing more uu than is necessary anyway

Re: TatkaSmoula vs. red1 minshu

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 5:44 pm
by Bioflick
red1 minshu wrote:and besides what is the point of losing more uu than is necessary anyway
Cos he losses more when you defend..

Re: TatkaSmoula vs. red1 minshu

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 5:46 pm
by ~Tziki~
red1 minshu wrote:and besides what is the point of losing more uu than is necessary anyway
in this game the only measure of who is the victor in war or a fight, is the willingness of either side to build big time and time again and risk their stats repeatedly without their motivation wavering. And their determination to take down their enemy no matter the cost.

With that taken into consideration, it is then the opinion of those outside of the fighting that also dictates who is perceived to be the victor. As neither side would openly admit defeat, or it is very unlikely they would.

So therefore, losing more UU and proving over and over you dont care what it costs you aslong as it costs your opponent just as much if not more, both to attack or when you retalliate, is exactly the point of doing it. To prove your the victor.

Why do you think DDE and FS keep going at it :P neither side wants to admit defeat.

Re: TatkaSmoula vs. red1 minshu

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 10:12 pm
by red1 minshu
well Tatka's 48t def is now a 2t def i zeroed him but before i could finish him off he bought weapons for 13mil supers i left alive because he phased

Re: TatkaSmoula vs. red1 minshu

Posted: Mon May 27, 2013 11:57 pm
by Field Marshall
[spoiler]
~Tziki~ wrote:
Why do you think DDE and FS keep going at it :P neither side DDE doesn't want to admit defeat.
:smt081[/spoiler]

Woooooooo death and destruction :smt025

Re: TatkaSmoula vs. red1 minshu

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 1:10 am
by Duderanch
And Red still has 0 defence :smt043

Re: TatkaSmoula vs. red1 minshu

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 3:13 am
by Guild
[spoiler]
~Tziki~ wrote:
Why do you think DDE and FS keep going at it :P neither side wants to admit defeat.
because odin and drah are happy to just see 3 people active in FS :smt043[/spoiler]

Re: TatkaSmoula vs. red1 minshu

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 3:13 am
by TatkaSmoula[mH]
red1 minshu wrote:well Tatka's 48t def is now a 2t def i zeroed him but before i could finish him off he bought weapons for 13mil supers i left alive because he phased
You lost more than me when you are doing offline massing. And than you have 30 mil covert with 0 defence + your 160-170 mil attack weapons ... all gone :)

Anyway defences are down. And now its time to build another big defences. I will have something for you after my ppt ends.

Re: TatkaSmoula vs. red1 minshu

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 3:18 am
by harchester
TatkaSmoula[mH] wrote:
red1 minshu wrote:well Tatka's 48t def is now a 2t def i zeroed him but before i could finish him off he bought weapons for 13mil supers i left alive because he phased
You lost more than me when you are doing offline massing. And than you have 30 mil covert with 0 defence + your 160-170 mil attack weapons ... all gone :)

Anyway defences are down. And now its time to build another big defences. I will have something for you after my ppt ends.
I guess this is a difference in the player when you get massed you build another big defence, when red gets massed he remains 0'd I must admit im learning a lot about you red, maybe next time you build a massive strike and the next person to come and mass you will have an easy time :smt043

Just curious did you remove his 160/170mill weps or did he sell them?

@Red are you Scottish? cause if so ill broker you naq to atleast build some sorta defence :-D

Re: TatkaSmoula vs. red1 minshu

Posted: Tue May 28, 2013 3:46 am
by TatkaSmoula[mH]
harchester wrote: .....
Just curious did you remove his 160/170mill weps or did he sell them?
.....
When i wake up i see that my defence is gone, but all my covert (around 55mil) still stand. So i bought few weapon for the rest of 13 mil super defenders and spy red.

His stats: big trike (160-170 mil attack weapons), 30 mil coverts and 0 defence. So i remove around 20 mil covert and he untrained all his coverts. So with WAR/WAR setting and almost 0 covert i use few sab with 0 loses to remove around 120 mil attack weapons, then he sold the rest of his weapons.

So this is the reason why he loose almost everything and i loose maybe 200-300k uus. not bad. . .

Now i have over 11T+ defence and will build more until my ppt end. Reds defence 0.