StarGateWars Forums

I do agree with making one big thread and name it Server War... would be so much easier...

Mathlord wrote:

~Odin~ #51 wrote:

Arkenius wrote:

Mathlord wrote:

Arkenius wrote:what's with the "+ TAF" in the title of the thread?

Because TAF is at war with TO. Thanks Tziki!

yeah but shouldnt it be TO vs OE + FS vs TAF ... since that seems more appropriate

Correction TO vs OE + FSF vs TAF

And yeah you kinda are Mathlord. Caprila and another member decided to mass one of our guys on ascended so there goes that 2 week notice of cancellation for our NAP.

We don't like people who cancel NAPs to try to pile on in a ME hunting war

*Goes to secretly high-five Caprila while vaguely shaking his finger at her in a "disappointed" fashion*

But let's face it...who actually calls a war with FS...a "war" hahahahahahahaha

We are not at war for ME purpose Mathlord. There are several different reasons as to why we decided to join the war however here is not the place to bring them up. No need to be a prick Mathlord I was just merely pointing out your statement was incorrect. There are currently stats all throughout FSF and a lot of us are off ppt. If you wish to bring the tone of things down by poking fun at our alliances then thats your choice and if you wish to act like a child then thats fine.

However an easier way to play this would be to get your members to build we all mass each other and things continue on just dandy and fine. No need to make little jabs at each other.

It isnt in a big thread because this thread is for

TO Vs OE + FS
TO vs Taf


i couldn't care if TAF are fighting OE
Nor if dde are fighting both
nor Mayhem.

~Tziki~ wrote:It isnt in a big thread because this thread is for

TO Vs OE + FS
TO vs Taf


i couldn't care if TAF are fighting OE
Nor if dde are fighting both
nor Mayhem.

The only thing you care about is Odie.....right? RIGHT? ^_^

~Odin~ #51 wrote:

Mathlord wrote:

~Odin~ #51 wrote:

Arkenius wrote:

Mathlord wrote:

Arkenius wrote:what's with the "+ TAF" in the title of the thread?

Because TAF is at war with TO. Thanks Tziki!

yeah but shouldnt it be TO vs OE + FS vs TAF ... since that seems more appropriate

Correction TO vs OE + FSF vs TAF

And yeah you kinda are Mathlord. Caprila and another member decided to mass one of our guys on ascended so there goes that 2 week notice of cancellation for our NAP.

We don't like people who cancel NAPs to try to pile on in a ME hunting war

*Goes to secretly high-five Caprila while vaguely shaking his finger at her in a "disappointed" fashion*

But let's face it...who actually calls a war with FS...a "war" hahahahahahahaha

We are not at war for ME purpose Mathlord. There are several different reasons as to why we decided to join the war however here is not the place to bring them up. No need to be a prick Mathlord I was just merely pointing out your statement was incorrect. There are currently stats all throughout FSF and a lot of us are off ppt. If you wish to bring the tone of things down by poking fun at our alliances then thats your choice and if you wish to act like a child then thats fine.

However an easier way to play this would be to get your members to build we all mass each other and things continue on just dandy and fine. No need to make little jabs at each other.

Cancelling a six month NAP a month after it starts so you can support your sugar daddy over in Omega does not fill me with confidence in your leet skills.

Come at me bro!

Tziki, don't interrupt the grown-ups

Mathlord wrote:[spoiler]

~Odin~ #51 wrote:

Mathlord wrote:

~Odin~ #51 wrote:

Arkenius wrote:

Mathlord wrote:

Arkenius wrote:what's with the "+ TAF" in the title of the thread?

Because TAF is at war with TO. Thanks Tziki!

yeah but shouldnt it be TO vs OE + FS vs TAF ... since that seems more appropriate

Correction TO vs OE + FSF vs TAF

And yeah you kinda are Mathlord. Caprila and another member decided to mass one of our guys on ascended so there goes that 2 week notice of cancellation for our NAP.

We don't like people who cancel NAPs to try to pile on in a ME hunting war

*Goes to secretly high-five Caprila while vaguely shaking his finger at her in a "disappointed" fashion*

But let's face it...who actually calls a war with FS...a "war" hahahahahahahaha

We are not at war for ME purpose Mathlord. There are several different reasons as to why we decided to join the war however here is not the place to bring them up. No need to be a prick Mathlord I was just merely pointing out your statement was incorrect. There are currently stats all throughout FSF and a lot of us are off ppt. If you wish to bring the tone of things down by poking fun at our alliances then thats your choice and if you wish to act like a child then thats fine.

However an easier way to play this would be to get your members to build we all mass each other and things continue on just dandy and fine. No need to make little jabs at each other.

[/spoiler]



Cancelling a six month NAP a month after it starts so you can support your sugar daddy over in Omega does not fill me with confidence in your leet skills.

Come at me bro!

Tziki, don't interrupt the grown-ups

sure thing Mathlord

yes because you sound like grown ups right now...

~Odin~ #51 wrote:

Mathlord wrote:

~Odin~ #51 wrote:

Arkenius wrote:

Mathlord wrote:

Arkenius wrote:what's with the "+ TAF" in the title of the thread?

Because TAF is at war with TO. Thanks Tziki!

yeah but shouldnt it be TO vs OE + FS vs TAF ... since that seems more appropriate

Correction TO vs OE + FSF vs TAF

And yeah you kinda are Mathlord. Caprila and another member decided to mass one of our guys on ascended so there goes that 2 week notice of cancellation for our NAP.

We don't like people who cancel NAPs to try to pile on in a ME hunting war

*Goes to secretly high-five Caprila while vaguely shaking his finger at her in a "disappointed" fashion*

But let's face it...who actually calls a war with FS...a "war" hahahahahahahaha

We are not at war for ME purpose Mathlord. There are several different reasons as to why we decided to join the war however here is not the place to bring them up. No need to be a prick Mathlord I was just merely pointing out your statement was incorrect. There are currently stats all throughout FSF and a lot of us are off ppt. If you wish to bring the tone of things down by poking fun at our alliances then thats your choice and if you wish to act like a child then thats fine.

However an easier way to play this would be to get your members to build we all mass each other and things continue on just dandy and fine. No need to make little jabs at each other.

I wouldn't call 1,2 and 3tril defences anything worth wasting AT on. That's why no ones massed them lol.

It wasn't that accurate anyway. I just massed a 28 tril def in FS...an 11 tril def in FS...and a 4 tril def in FS...the 4 tril had about 80 million spies behind it

Thanks for cancelling the NAP guys!

Setesh wrote:Really Coyle? Only worth it if it's in OE then eh? Because I build a 2-3 trill defense for you chaps every night before I go to bed and it's gone every morning

Maybe people just like you Personally ill only mass defences that low if there are a decent amount of spies behind it. A few in JOT/DDE will say the same.

Mathlord wrote:It wasn't that accurate anyway. I just massed a 28 tril def in FS...an 11 tril def in FS...and a 4 tril def in FS...the 4 tril had about 80 million spies behind it

Thanks for cancelling the NAP guys!

Honestly cancelling a NAP while allied with those who just declared war on us was a declaration in itself. Valar Morghulis

Mathlord wrote:It wasn't that accurate anyway. I just massed a 28 tril def in FS...an 11 tril def in FS...and a 4 tril def in FS...the 4 tril had about 80 million spies behind it

Thanks for cancelling the NAP guys!

Setesh wrote:Really Coyle? Only worth it if it's in OE then eh? Because I build a 2-3 trill defense for you chaps every night before I go to bed and it's gone every morning

Probably because 99% of the time you have a rebuilt MS

~Odin~ #51 wrote:

Mathlord wrote:

~Odin~ #51 wrote:

Arkenius wrote:

Mathlord wrote:

Arkenius wrote:what's with the "+ TAF" in the title of the thread?

Because TAF is at war with TO. Thanks Tziki!

yeah but shouldnt it be TO vs OE + FS vs TAF ... since that seems more appropriate

Correction TO vs OE + FSF vs TAF

And yeah you kinda are Mathlord. Caprila and another member decided to mass one of our guys on ascended so there goes that 2 week notice of cancellation for our NAP.

We don't like people who cancel NAPs to try to pile on in a ME hunting war

*Goes to secretly high-five Caprila while vaguely shaking his finger at her in a "disappointed" fashion*

But let's face it...who actually calls a war with FS...a "war" hahahahahahahaha

We are not at war for ME purpose Mathlord. There are several different reasons as to why we decided to join the war however here is not the place to bring them up. No need to be a prick Mathlord I was just merely pointing out your statement was incorrect. There are currently stats all throughout FSF and a lot of us are off ppt. If you wish to bring the tone of things down by poking fun at our alliances then thats your choice and if you wish to act like a child then thats fine.

However an easier way to play this would be to get your members to build we all mass each other and things continue on just dandy and fine. No need to make little jabs at each other.

1. Being OE's **Filtered**
2. Being OE's **Filtered**
3. Being OE's **Filtered**

Think I covered most of them...