StarGateWars Forums

generaloneill wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

Mathlord wrote:The CIA is quite frankly too big to stay together after this war. Right now, it works as people from all these different alliances can band together to mass the CoP, but can you imagine trying to control the actions of probably 500 or more players? It would be chaos.

Some of the alliances had agreements with eachother before the war, some had previously been enemies and might become enemies again one day, but we are all united by the greatest calling in SGW. To fight and win the war to end all wars, or so they and the powers of WW1 say.

I assure you of this..you will NEVER win! As for the CIA becoming a 2nd CoP, highly unlikely. They do not have the leadership, the infrastructure, the will but most importantly the friendship with each other that is needed. It is a huge mistake to assume the CoP stay together for game reasons. It is loyalty and friendship that maintains the CoP..and this war has contributed hugely in that growth.

In every previous war, the CoP leaders talked to each other and the alliances usually did their own thing. but this war we have communicated with the masses. I have gotten to know so many DD/DDE members who now regularly contact me for whatever reason. Even ppl like inferno, who I always felt had anti omegan sentiments, we talk more often and such. We have truly become an enlarged community, in the true spirit of the game.

Are Omega ruthless? Yes we are! But we always go after ppl with a reason. A reason most don't know about but there is always a reason. The EPA have some sort of personal rivalry with us which is a joke. During the last omega/epa war they had access to our forums and there was not one anti epa thread there, yet on their forums there were many anti omegan. I understand why the TA dislike us, why Robe does....

On the war itself, I think the ill feeling has truly reached epic proportions. I personally have lost alot of respect for who I term hypocrites. I won't name names, but in the past they have come running to me and stating things like 'yeah I also believe Extremer cheats', but when it suits them they don't mind allying with someone they believe cheats.

And all this nonsense about propaganda..One can't even post the truth without the other side stating it's propaganda. This may be only a game, but people use your common sense and don't be so naive. Do not condone something just because the person is on your side.

The most amusing thing in this whole war was the boycott. Now really, would there be a single anti cop, anti omega or anti etl thread if this was a biased CoP forum. Everything that the CIA typed contradicted that 'bold' and UNTRUE statement. Would you all be up for a little experiment? Ask the mods to delete every thread that talks negatively about the CoP, Omega or myself. We'll see how much the forum has shrunk after that!

we may not win, but we promise you one thing. A very long drawn out war. We are prepared to keep farming and raiding your accounts for a year if we have to, but we will not surrender. I know you will never surrender either, which is why I am confident of a very long war. Only difference is your arrogance assumes we will surrender, we shall see xxxx.

MOD EDIT: Only people who know me may address me in a personal way..and you my dear fellow don't!

NP shaitan, sorry.

Brdavs wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:
I assure you of this..you will NEVER win! As for the CIA becoming a 2nd CoP, highly unlikely. They do not have the leadership, the infrastructure, the will but most importantly the friendship with each other that is needed. It is a huge mistake to assume the CoP stay together for game reasons. It is loyalty and friendship that maintains the CoP..and this war has contributed hugely in that growth.

2 quck comments on this all but standardised speech. Standard answers for standard points heh...

1) Are your egoes really that big you actually believe you monopolize all the skill, leadership and friendship of this game? Nvm, why am I asking, the cheerleding brigade droped in 2 posts later calling ppl "noobs", what more do I need heh. As they say: "Loyalties are forged. Betrayals are wrought." This war is forging mighty CIA steel indeed lol. If calling names helps yo deal with it, fine.
You assume much and assumptions (as they also say) is the mother of all feckups. The assumption of your vast superiority is currently biting you in the rear.

2) As I recall GA was once a merry band maintained by loyalty and friendship, and that turned out great... It allways makes me chuckle when you bring up neverending friendship and loyalty till the end as your rock solid base. Considering the track record lol...

Dundee wrote:

generaloneill wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:

Mathlord wrote:The CIA is quite frankly too big to stay together after this war. Right now, it works as people from all these different alliances can band together to mass the CoP, but can you imagine trying to control the actions of probably 500 or more players? It would be chaos.

Some of the alliances had agreements with eachother before the war, some had previously been enemies and might become enemies again one day, but we are all united by the greatest calling in SGW. To fight and win the war to end all wars, or so they and the powers of WW1 say.

I assure you of this..you will NEVER win! As for the CIA becoming a 2nd CoP, highly unlikely. They do not have the leadership, the infrastructure, the will but most importantly the friendship with each other that is needed. It is a huge mistake to assume the CoP stay together for game reasons. It is loyalty and friendship that maintains the CoP..and this war has contributed hugely in that growth.

In every previous war, the CoP leaders talked to each other and the alliances usually did their own thing. but this war we have communicated with the masses. I have gotten to know so many DD/DDE members who now regularly contact me for whatever reason. Even ppl like inferno, who I always felt had anti omegan sentiments, we talk more often and such. We have truly become an enlarged community, in the true spirit of the game.

Are Omega ruthless? Yes we are! But we always go after ppl with a reason. A reason most don't know about but there is always a reason. The EPA have some sort of personal rivalry with us which is a joke. During the last omega/epa war they had access to our forums and there was not one anti epa thread there, yet on their forums there were many anti omegan. I understand why the TA dislike us, why Robe does....

On the war itself, I think the ill feeling has truly reached epic proportions. I personally have lost alot of respect for who I term hypocrites. I won't name names, but in the past they have come running to me and stating things like 'yeah I also believe Extremer cheats', but when it suits them they don't mind allying with someone they believe cheats.

And all this nonsense about propaganda..One can't even post the truth without the other side stating it's propaganda. This may be only a game, but people use your common sense and don't be so naive. Do not condone something just because the person is on your side.

The most amusing thing in this whole war was the boycott. Now really, would there be a single anti cop, anti omega or anti etl thread if this was a biased CoP forum. Everything that the CIA typed contradicted that 'bold' and UNTRUE statement. Would you all be up for a little experiment? Ask the mods to delete every thread that talks negatively about the CoP, Omega or myself. We'll see how much the forum has shrunk after that!

we may not win, but we promise you one thing. A very long drawn out war. We are prepared to keep farming and raiding your accounts for a year if we have to, but we will not surrender. I know you will never surrender either, which is why I am confident of a very long war. Only difference is your arrogance assumes we will surrender, we shall see xxxx.

MOD EDIT: Only people who know me may address me in a personal way..and you my dear fellow don't!

NP shaitan, sorry.

Sorry wait, is that another abuse of power by a mod?

If you called me by my real name do I have that option to mod the post?

No, I would have to PM a mod and hope that they find it important enough to justify their time to change it and would they add a sarcy comment? No I dont think they would.

I personally hope you ban me for this post because it would give me some respite from this crap.

~Phoenix~ wrote:

Brdavs wrote:

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:
I assure you of this..you will NEVER win! As for the CIA becoming a 2nd CoP, highly unlikely. They do not have the leadership, the infrastructure, the will but most importantly the friendship with each other that is needed. It is a huge mistake to assume the CoP stay together for game reasons. It is loyalty and friendship that maintains the CoP..and this war has contributed hugely in that growth.

2 quck comments on this all but standardised speech. Standard answers for standard points heh...

1) Are your egoes really that big you actually believe you monopolize all the skill, leadership and friendship of this game? Nvm, why am I asking, the cheerleding brigade droped in 2 posts later calling ppl "noobs", what more do I need heh. As they say: "Loyalties are forged. Betrayals are wrought." This war is forging mighty CIA steel indeed lol. If calling names helps yo deal with it, fine.
You assume much and assumptions (as they also say) is the mother of all feckups. The assumption of your vast superiority is currently biting you in the rear.

2) As I recall GA was once a merry band maintained by loyalty and friendship, and that turned out great... It allways makes me chuckle when you bring up neverending friendship and loyalty till the end as your rock solid base. Considering the track record lol...

Erm.. what? What a load of rubbish, that just wasted 20 seconds of my life in reading that. Cant you make posts that make sense? Btw I never even heard of you before but we are'nt going to surrender get that into your skull.

Mathlord wrote:Actually we WILL win, but that's beside the point

You notice this is becoming the war thread again? Oh well, c'est la vie I guess.

Thank you for admitting the TA has our reasons for fighting. Including, but not exclusively the fact we were being massed before we even joined the war, but you wouldn't know anything about that, would you?

And ETL, I absolutely agree with you again (pigs are flying, aren't they?), the CIA does not have the infrastructure to become another CoP. Well guess what, WE DON'T WANT TO BE ONE! Now why don't you go off and tell all your alliances mates that we are not trying to be the CoP, we are trying to stop there from being any group of alliances as powerful as the CoP. That would surely cut down on the number of posts on this forum as well.

That is not to say, we don't have excellent command structure in our individual alliances and enough communication over MSN and other forums to coordinate strikes against you, that has been clearly proven and will continue to be proven.

The ill feeling has gotten pretty bad, but it has been because of the actions and statements of CoP members just as much as CIA members, that just the facts of a war of this magnitude. We have hundreds of players fighting and bad things happen, unfortunately.

The boycot I understand from past experience in wars where a majority of mods were involved in the war, but let's not dredge up the past; however, some of us should stay here to, as ETL put it, use our "common sense", just with a slightly different outcome than my adversaries in the
CoP.

Brdavs wrote:

~Phoenix~ wrote:
Erm.. what? What a load of rubbish, that just wasted 20 seconds of my life in reading that. Cant you make posts that make sense? Btw I never even heard of you before but we are'nt going to surrender get that into your skull.

m8, by the looks of it you have serious reading comprehension issues... where do you even sent a hint of surrender talk in there? what, is it the proverbs that are too much to handle? Fetch a book or two and "decode" stuff be4 you go calling names.

Brdavs wrote:The assumption of your vast superiority is currently biting you in the rear.

~Phoenix~ wrote:

Brdavs wrote:

~Phoenix~ wrote:
Erm.. what? What a load of rubbish, that just wasted 20 seconds of my life in reading that. Cant you make posts that make sense? Btw I never even heard of you before but we are'nt going to surrender get that into your skull.

m8, by the looks of it you have serious reading comprehension issues... where do you even sent a hint of surrender talk in there? what, is it the proverbs that are too much to handle? Fetch a book or two and "decode" stuff be4 you go calling names.

Brdavs wrote:The assumption of your vast superiority is currently biting you in the rear.

That sis it all, you didnt say exactly what I pointed out but it was clearly intended.

~Phoenix~ wrote:Erm.. what? What a load of rubbish, that just wasted 20 seconds of my life in reading that. Cant you make posts that make sense? Btw I never even heard of you before but we are'nt going to surrender get that into your skull.

SSG EnterTheLion wrote:I assure you of this..you will NEVER win! As for the CIA becoming a 2nd CoP, highly unlikely. They do not have the leadership, the infrastructure, the will but most importantly the friendship with each other that is needed. It is a huge mistake to assume the CoP stay together for game reasons. It is loyalty and friendship that maintains the CoP..and this war has contributed hugely in that growth.