Page 9 of 9

Posted: Sat May 26, 2007 4:49 am
by Cole
The Xeno wrote:
I said FONDAMENTALISM not the religious autorities, or if you mean them, they force whole country to biased point of living/view...laicity is way better: we dont force you to be a religion, you can choose by yourself.

I fail to see this. To be sure, I do occasionally get a little flustered when mormons, or wittness' interupt my dinner and I have to scramble for shoes... but that hardly constitutes 'force'.

Dark Apophis The Great ™ wrote:USA led by weapons, fundamentalism and 40%abstensionism to elections, TIME TO GET CLINTON OR OBAMA HERE BEFORE IT GETS WORSE...

Led by weapons? Led by fundamentalism?
If that were true, then the only way Hillary and Obama could be running for office, is if they were mastermind manipulators. The fact that they are running, and getting such support, is the best evidence against them and their cries of doomsday radical convsrvitive brainwashing.
:)

Dark Apophis The Great ™ wrote:Oh wait twas Bush who REMOVED what Clinton did to minimize guns market in USA who caused a drama few weeks ago in a campus, how much innocent people died already?

I'm not sure how much about those laws you know, but the ones that were not renewed would have made no difference in the VT case even had congress re-passed them.
And I, for one was eagerly waiting for those laws to expire (not be 'removed').
My posts in the VT thread should adequately sum up my reasons for that opinion.


Oh forgot to mention WWASP in my list

Erm... World Wide Association of Specialty Programs?
I'm curious. :)


Come_Forth wrote:I hope that Obama wins :P.

I was eagerly watching his campaign... trying to learn more about him.
Watched him on C-Span a number of times however, and will still be going republican.

About fundamentalism xeno, there are the countries where it's 100% on, and those where there's great influence BUT NOT total, here it is.


http://www.antiwwasp.com/
Learn about wwasp here, or look in google if you find it too biased, some other sites will still say that program doesnt follow human rights

Posted: Sat May 26, 2007 4:54 am
by Fear Of The Duck
And how is that related to the topic?

Posted: Sat May 26, 2007 4:56 am
by Cole
Corran Horn wrote:And how is that related to the topic?

Because
Related to Bush, bush=political "enemy" of socialists so it is on topic.

Posted: Sat May 26, 2007 5:00 am
by Fear Of The Duck
Dark Apophis The Great ™ wrote:
Corran Horn wrote:And how is that related to the topic?

Because
Related to Bush, bush=political "enemy" of socialists so it is on topic.


"political"

Posted: Sat May 26, 2007 5:24 am
by Juliette
Non-argument.