StarGateWars Forums

Ashu wrote:I personaly don't care if you use all the $$ you have and build the biggest account 999999 times my size...just don't mass me and say you'r better just because i can't or won't use $$ to get ahead.Thats not pathetic nor wrong,but bad sportmanship(gamership).Would you attack someone with a cannon if the person has a knife?

I established my gaming abilities long before I started to use $$ so I suppose I shouldnt be very offended by the comments of Rocky, but I am a little nonetheless.

Back on topic. No I do not support random massing, but I am against those that like to label someone a random masser just because the details of why you are hit are not made available. So I can see new motivation for me in the near future. WAR vs those that reclklessly use the term RANDOM MASSER

GETUMMMMMMMMMM

Jedi~Tank is a random masser

Go jedi get the incorrect people.

And Yes, If someone attacked me with a knife and I had a cannon I would shoot them with it.
Age old saying that, "Dont bring a knife to a gun fight"
Reason, youll get dead.

schuesseled wrote:Go jedi get the incorrect people.

And Yes, If someone attacked me with a knife and I had a cannon I would shoot them with it.
Age old saying that, "Dont bring a knife to a gun fight"
Reason, youll get dead.

so would anyone lol, but jedi is bringing his cannon to a knife fight not the other way around according to your analogy.

Edit: I don't agree with it btw.

It's more like Ferrari spending 3 times as much money on their F1 car as everyone else and winning because of it. But now new rules are coming in to prevent that.

schuesseled wrote:
And Yes, If someone attacked me with a knife and I had a cannon I would shoot them with it.
Age old saying that, "Dont bring a knife to a gun fight"
Reason, youll get dead.

had to siggy that mate.

Lore wrote:

schuesseled wrote:
And Yes, If someone attacked me with a knife and I had a cannon I would shoot them with it.
Age old saying that, "Dont bring a knife to a gun fight"
Reason, youll get dead.

had to siggy that mate.

Excellent

,

And grizzly doesnt really matter either way, if you have a knife on you, you deserve to be shot with a cannon lol. Knifes are dangerous you could have someones eye out.
Its no joke!

Edit : //
New rule will suck. I want them to spend Bzillions!, Ferarri werent winning anything, Brawn who had no money and no sponsers and were going bankrupt are/were winning, havent caught up with F1 in a few months , although my friend was telling me when ferrari had like 5 cars and most other teams could only afford 2 lol,

Edit : ///

And I suppose I can re-word my analogy.

Age old saying that, "Bring a Gun to a Knife fight"
Reason, They'll get dead.

very true, knives are dangerous but so are nukes doesnt mean America will destroy Russia for having nukes though.

Truth is, nobody every massed Jedi and then complains when he gets massed back but people are complaining if they get massed without reasonable provocation, and yea everyone can say reasonable is reletive to one's interpretation. It's exactly the same in rl. someone might think that killing someone for looking at them is justified but the majority don't because otherwise that would be chaos. the laws of democratic countries are built on the majorities opinion on what is reasonable.

So when people use the term random massing they mean random to a reasonable degree. i.e if no insulting language was used or attacks were issued. Thats probably a degree that most would agree to.

point

Is this thread turning into a knife/car/nuke/cannon thread?

Damn skippy we are, and if America had something bigger than a nuke, lets say intergalatic space ship with asgard beaming technology + weapons and ancient shielding, they'd destroy Russia, lets be honhest.

schuesseled wrote:Damn skippy we are, and if America had something bigger than a nuke, lets say intergalatic space ship with asgard beaming technology + weapons and ancient shielding, they'd destroy Russia, lets be honhest.

Where would we get our mail order brides from then?

MaxSterling wrote:

schuesseled wrote:Damn skippy we are, and if America had something bigger than a nuke, lets say intergalatic space ship with asgard beaming technology + weapons and ancient shielding, they'd destroy Russia, lets be honhest.

Where would we get our mail order brides from then?

Scandinavia


and as for nuking Russia, there are laws, and rules of engagement (Geniva convention, NATO, etc, etc) In TGW they do not exist and many can argue that Admin himself wants random massings, otherwise he would create restriction on it. Free, unlimited resources, coupled with punishing players who try to grow, means you either grow, and become stale and lose intrest in the game, or you mass people.

CABAL wrote:

Pimping D wrote:what if i pick on players bigger than me???

that acceptable in your eyes....

First of all, (army)size does not matter (To an extent). There are many people in this game, who might only have some <50mil armysize, that would beat a 400mil player to hell and back.

But, if, by bigger, you mean, players which have a higher chance of winning than you do, and will certainly strike back, then I do see that as acceptable.
Mainly because, it's you who are causing destruction to yourself, YOU who have provoked them. You will only be a nuisance in their eyes, and don't forget the fact that the older (not necessarily age-wise) players have many, many friends/acquaintances/allies, which they have acquired over the years.

of course i want a fight back. And i dont go pick on a army size difference since it only takes 10 mil army to mass a 1.5 tril def. Thats with major loses