StarGateWars Forums

E.M.P. wrote:

MajorLeeHurts wrote:3 suggestions that would limit the damage any one mod or admin can inflict.

1, 1 year time limit for moderator and administrative office. 1 year Subsequent office subject to peer review.

2, No Admin shall dually hold leadership office in an empire coalition or alliance in game.

ie , removing the or limiting the chances of abuse of power.

Furthermore I would like to add that Mods changing names as much as you all do is very frustrating and confusing for even long term members ( nice elusive tactic ) but give it a rest. You would be far more approachable and effective with a hint of continuity.

Why should the time one can be a Staff Member be limited? If you are good, stay as long as you can. If not, you are removed.

Your idea to apparently limit bias is unnecessary. You cannot show that any Mod still on the team uses their power to benefit their allies ingame, and hurt their enemies ingame. The ingame position of a user is of absolutely no concern to the Staff.

Your attitude is really not helpful, by the way. "Nice elusive tactic." Thanks, what exactly are we eluding? It would take approximately 30 seconds to deduce who a Moderator is if you took the time to check. I guess it's easier to just complain about it though. You don't need to know their names anyways, if you have a complaint it should only be based on their action and on nothing else.

See that's the thing, the mods here that are clearly not capable of modding any forum still have their jobs, so I can only assume the people who review them are friends.

The name changing is annoying as hell, surely the whole point of a mod is to be contactable, keep chaging forums names makes it a pain to know who exactly is meant to be modding what.

and your line about bias, and no member of the current team showing bias towards allies\friends...that was meant as a joke right? because if you truely believe this, you're not only deluded but a liar to boot lol

I applaud MLH's suggestions

renegadze wrote:

E.M.P. wrote:

MajorLeeHurts wrote:3 suggestions that would limit the damage any one mod or admin can inflict.

1, 1 year time limit for moderator and administrative office. 1 year Subsequent office subject to peer review.

2, No Admin shall dually hold leadership office in an empire coalition or alliance in game.

ie , removing the or limiting the chances of abuse of power.

Furthermore I would like to add that Mods changing names as much as you all do is very frustrating and confusing for even long term members ( nice elusive tactic ) but give it a rest. You would be far more approachable and effective with a hint of continuity.

Why should the time one can be a Staff Member be limited? If you are good, stay as long as you can. If not, you are removed.

Your idea to apparently limit bias is unnecessary. You cannot show that any Mod still on the team uses their power to benefit their allies ingame, and hurt their enemies ingame. The ingame position of a user is of absolutely no concern to the Staff.

Your attitude is really not helpful, by the way. "Nice elusive tactic." Thanks, what exactly are we eluding? It would take approximately 30 seconds to deduce who a Moderator is if you took the time to check. I guess it's easier to just complain about it though. You don't need to know their names anyways, if you have a complaint it should only be based on their action and on nothing else.

See that's the thing, the mods here that are clearly not capable of modding any forum still have their jobs, so I can only assume the people who review them are friends.

The name changing is annoying as hell, surely the whole point of a mod is to be contactable, keep chaging forums names makes it a pain to know who exactly is meant to be modding what.

and your line about bias, and no member of the current team showing bias towards allies\friends...that was meant as a joke right? because if you truely believe this, you're not only deluded but a liar to boot lol

I applaud MLH's suggestions

Why do you KEEP saying things like that Rene? If all you can do is post things like, "See that's the thing, the mods here that are clearly not capable of modding any forum still have their jobs, so I can only assume the people who review them are friends" without actually naming any Mod you think is doing a bad job then why post at all?

The name changing is hard to figure out ... until you click any one of the dozens of links littered throughout the front page of the forums. Or perhaps the topic in the announcement section that is always updated and names every Mod and their section. Damn that was hard.

I'm a liar because I believe differently than you? Okay. If it makes you happy then just keep saying the same thing over, and over, and over, without actually ever presenting any actual evidence at all. I believe you to be a scammer, you scam people all the time, and so is everyone else in TL. Wow this accusing people without proof is fun!

Some people will always complain/criticize anyway, they will never be happy with the mod team or any real life incarnation of authority/power, for various subjective and few objective reasons. If a mod team improves something about themselves, people will say it wasn't done properly, or wasn't done sufficiently. The only way to have close to a perfect team would be to have robots as mods, but they would still be blamed as they would be accused to "lack humanity" in their judging lol.

MajorLeeHurts wrote:3 suggestions that would limit the damage any one mod or admin can inflict.
1, 1 year time limit for moderator and administrative office. 1 year Subsequent office subject to peer review.

Peer review? And who, pray tell, are these 'peers' when it comes to administrators? While the moderators are indeed simple users with just a tad more responsibilities and corresponding power, the Administration is in fact beyond anyone else found within the membership of this forum. Jason has decreed it such, Masters of the Forum.

MajorLeeHurts wrote:2, No Admin shall dually hold leadership office in an empire coalition or alliance in game.
ie , removing the or limiting the chances of abuse of power.

How petty, pulling your political vendetta into an issue that you are inventing on the spot.. power abuse? Our Admins? I know of a few who did in the past.. but then, we all have records in the past. The current administration is clean as a window. You do not have an argument.. you just want to see one of my beloved mentors stripped of power. Naughty, naughty, Major.

MajorLeeHurts wrote:Furthermore I would like to add that Mods changing names as much as you all do is very frustrating and confusing for even long term members ( nice elusive tactic ) but give it a rest. You would be far more approachable and effective with a hint of continuity.

A single number suffices to take away your pain.. I am 14. Deni is 6510. JB is 12388. Wait. I can see how that would be complicated to work with. Not to worry, that is what we have signatures for.. *glare*

And you people* tell us we are difficult to talk to. By Jove.. this is like talking to a brick wall. A brick wall with a tape-player stuck on "OMG BIAS, OMG CORRUPT, OMG FORUM DIEING". How utterly boring and unproductive.


*i.e. the three or four individual radical elements among an otherwise calm and moderate population.

MajorLeeHurts wrote:Proactively I have consistently made 2 suggestions that would limit the damage any one mod or admin can inflict.

1, 1 year time limit for moderator and administrative office. 1 year Subsequent office subject to peer review.

2, No Admin shall dually hold leadership office in an empire coalition or alliance in game.

ie , removing the or limiting the chances of abuse of power.

VERY good suggestions that should be implemented! I don't really care about number 2 but the first one is a must!

Emp.... I am honestly surprised that you are that naive.

MajorLeeHurts wrote:3 suggestions that would limit the damage any one mod or admin can inflict.

1, 1 year time limit for moderator and administrative office. 1 year Subsequent office subject to peer review.

I like the idea of fixed terms for administrators, although I think to extend it to all moderators would be a bit much.

2, No Admin shall dually hold leadership office in an empire coalition or alliance in game.

No. As I detailed here the never ending search for 'neutral' moderators has been to the detriment of this forum. We should be promoting the best people for the job. People who are competent, and people who are fair. As long as you're fair, and good at your job, your in-game affiliation should be irrelevant.

E.M.P. wrote:

renegadze wrote:

E.M.P. wrote:

MajorLeeHurts wrote:3 suggestions that would limit the damage any one mod or admin can inflict.

1, 1 year time limit for moderator and administrative office. 1 year Subsequent office subject to peer review.

2, No Admin shall dually hold leadership office in an empire coalition or alliance in game.

ie , removing the or limiting the chances of abuse of power.

Furthermore I would like to add that Mods changing names as much as you all do is very frustrating and confusing for even long term members ( nice elusive tactic ) but give it a rest. You would be far more approachable and effective with a hint of continuity.

Why should the time one can be a Staff Member be limited? If you are good, stay as long as you can. If not, you are removed.

Your idea to apparently limit bias is unnecessary. You cannot show that any Mod still on the team uses their power to benefit their allies ingame, and hurt their enemies ingame. The ingame position of a user is of absolutely no concern to the Staff.

Your attitude is really not helpful, by the way. "Nice elusive tactic." Thanks, what exactly are we eluding? It would take approximately 30 seconds to deduce who a Moderator is if you took the time to check. I guess it's easier to just complain about it though. You don't need to know their names anyways, if you have a complaint it should only be based on their action and on nothing else.

See that's the thing, the mods here that are clearly not capable of modding any forum still have their jobs, so I can only assume the people who review them are friends.

The name changing is annoying as hell, surely the whole point of a mod is to be contactable, keep chaging forums names makes it a pain to know who exactly is meant to be modding what.

and your line about bias, and no member of the current team showing bias towards allies\friends...that was meant as a joke right? because if you truely believe this, you're not only deluded but a liar to boot lol

I applaud MLH's suggestions

Why do you KEEP saying things like that Rene? If all you can do is post things like, "See that's the thing, the mods here that are clearly not capable of modding any forum still have their jobs, so I can only assume the people who review them are friends" without actually naming any Mod you think is doing a bad job then why post at all?

The name changing is hard to figure out ... until you click any one of the dozens of links littered throughout the front page of the forums. Or perhaps the topic in the announcement section that is always updated and names every Mod and their section. Damn that was hard.

I'm a liar because I believe differently than you? Okay. If it makes you happy then just keep saying the same thing over, and over, and over, without actually ever presenting any actual evidence at all. I believe you to be a scammer, you scam people all the time, and so is everyone else in TL. Wow this accusing people without proof is fun!

I have reported a number of mods, for different things over a fairly substantial time...and what happen to all my reports? I never even got an acknowlegement of them - the "reportind a mod" basically does not work, because that would involve someone upsetting their friend.

Because you're a mod and know exactly where to click to find out all info about mods isn't exactly surprising, and I could probably track it down fairly easy, but to new members of this forum, who barely know what goes into any given section, i'm pretty sure they'd appreciated it...but hey we don't care about new people starting out right?

without proof? really? your memory is that short?

renegadze wrote:but hey we don't care about new people starting out right?

Hmm that must be why I see all those people offering their help (advice, commandership,...) and even creating new sites to help the newbies. If people care about them for in game part, I'm sure they do it too for the forum part..it's not like sections names aren't clear after all, with sub-describing for each and all..This forum is more clear than many I faced, even though, I agree, the big amount of subsections.

Cole wrote:

renegadze wrote:but hey we don't care about new people starting out right?

Hmm that must be why I see all those people offering their help (advice, commandership,...) and even creating new sites to help the newbies. If people care about them for in game part, I'm sure they do it too for the forum part..it's not like sections names aren't clear after all, with sub-describing for each and all..This forum is more clear than many I faced, even though, I agree, the big amount of subsections.

it's called sarcasm

@Rene;

I think anyone new to the forums would see the "Moderator: General - Battle/FAQ Mods" listed under literally every sub-section, for every section. Of course different groups for different sections.

January 24th of 2010 was the last time you lodged a complaint against a member of the Forum Staff. The member you lodged it against is no longer on the team. Using the report function on the post of a Moderator does not qualify as lodging a complaint, because if the post breaks the rules then it will be handled, if not, it won't. Assuming you were referring to that function.

I will say it clearly. If you have a complaint against a Moderator, or more than one Moderator, please go to Forum & Mod Feedback and create a topic. Outline your complaint, lay out your evidence, and as the replies come in defend your point of view. If your complaint is found to be valid, then either the Moderator will reform, or face consequences.

E.M.P. wrote:@Rene;

I think anyone new to the forums would see the "Moderator: General - Battle/FAQ Mods" listed under literally every sub-section, for every section. Of course different groups for different sections.

January 24th of 2010 was the last time you lodged a complaint against a member of the Forum Staff. The member you lodged it against is no longer on the team. Using the report function on the post of a Moderator does not qualify as lodging a complaint, because if the post breaks the rules then it will be handled, if not, it won't. Assuming you were referring to that function.

I will say it clearly. If you have a complaint against a Moderator, or more than one Moderator, please go to Forum & Mod Feedback and create a topic. Outline your complaint, lay out your evidence, and as the replies come in defend your point of view. If your complaint is found to be valid, then either the Moderator will reform, or face consequences.

I stopped using the forum function a very long time ago, when i never got a response, I have since taken to talking to people a little more directly. The current complaint I have will be going to Jason himself - I'm sure he won't be surprised since I already spoke with him previously about said person.

renegadze wrote:I have reported a number of mods, for different things over a fairly substantial time...and what happen to all my reports? I never even got an acknowlegement of them - the "reportind a mod" basically does not work, because that would involve someone upsetting their friend.

I have warned 16 individual moderators past and present, 2 of the current GMs, 1 current administrator and 2 ex-admins during my tenure as a moderator. Whenever someone reported one who deserved a warning (do not forget, the actual giving of a warning happens only when actual rules are broken), I gave them a warning. I have replied to each and every PM I have received in my capacity as a moderator. Is your memory really that short? Or do you just twist the truth to suit your agenda? I will take it your memory is defective, as I cannot possibly imagine you would stoop so low.

renegadze wrote:Because you're a mod and know exactly where to click to find out all info about mods isn't exactly surprising, and I could probably track it down fairly easy, but to new members of this forum, who barely know what goes into any given section, i'm pretty sure they'd appreciated it...but hey we don't care about new people starting out right?

Do they complain? No. Only a few older members with an axe to grind have, so far. New people actually have a rather good tendency to follow rules and communicate, instead of whining and .. in random threads.

renegadze wrote:without proof? really? your memory is that short?

*chuckles* Too easy.

renegadze wrote:I stopped using the forum function a very long time ago, when i never got a response, I have since taken to talking to people a little more directly. The current complaint I have will be going to Jason himself - I'm sure he won't be surprised since I already spoke with him previously about said person.

In other words, you are whining about not getting a response when you do not use the proper channels of communication? Oh my, I can see why that would be an issue. I hope you can find someone to help you with that.
Sorry, but your nonsensical generalisations are obnoxious, untrue and boring. Bah. I stick my neck out for you and our fellow users, and this is the pathetic reaction I get?!

renegadze wrote:

E.M.P. wrote:@Rene;

I think anyone new to the forums would see the "Moderator: General - Battle/FAQ Mods" listed under literally every sub-section, for every section. Of course different groups for different sections.

January 24th of 2010 was the last time you lodged a complaint against a member of the Forum Staff. The member you lodged it against is no longer on the team. Using the report function on the post of a Moderator does not qualify as lodging a complaint, because if the post breaks the rules then it will be handled, if not, it won't. Assuming you were referring to that function.

I will say it clearly. If you have a complaint against a Moderator, or more than one Moderator, please go to Forum & Mod Feedback and create a topic. Outline your complaint, lay out your evidence, and as the replies come in defend your point of view. If your complaint is found to be valid, then either the Moderator will reform, or face consequences.

I stopped using the forum function a very long time ago, when i never got a response, I have since taken to talking to people a little more directly. The current complaint I have will be going to Jason himself - I'm sure he won't be surprised since I already spoke with him previously about said person.

You never get a response to the Report Function because either the report is closed without action, or the person gets verbal/board warnings. What sort of notification would you get?

Ya, bring your complaint to Jason, the man who has literally NO idea what goes on here. I'm sure he will not only know what you're talking about, but feel confident in making a decision regarding a situation he is entirely ignorant of.

E.M.P. wrote:

renegadze wrote:

E.M.P. wrote:

MajorLeeHurts wrote:3 suggestions that would limit the damage any one mod or admin can inflict.

1, 1 year time limit for moderator and administrative office. 1 year Subsequent office subject to peer review.

2, No Admin shall dually hold leadership office in an empire coalition or alliance in game.

ie , removing the or limiting the chances of abuse of power.

Furthermore I would like to add that Mods changing names as much as you all do is very frustrating and confusing for even long term members ( nice elusive tactic ) but give it a rest. You would be far more approachable and effective with a hint of continuity.

Why should the time one can be a Staff Member be limited? If you are good, stay as long as you can. If not, you are removed.

Your idea to apparently limit bias is unnecessary. You cannot show that any Mod still on the team uses their power to benefit their allies ingame, and hurt their enemies ingame. The ingame position of a user is of absolutely no concern to the Staff.

Your attitude is really not helpful, by the way. "Nice elusive tactic." Thanks, what exactly are we eluding? It would take approximately 30 seconds to deduce who a Moderator is if you took the time to check. I guess it's easier to just complain about it though. You don't need to know their names anyways, if you have a complaint it should only be based on their action and on nothing else.

See that's the thing, the mods here that are clearly not capable of modding any forum still have their jobs, so I can only assume the people who review them are friends.

The name changing is annoying as hell, surely the whole point of a mod is to be contactable, keep chaging forums names makes it a pain to know who exactly is meant to be modding what.

and your line about bias, and no member of the current team showing bias towards allies\friends...that was meant as a joke right? because if you truely believe this, you're not only deluded but a liar to boot lol

I applaud MLH's suggestions

Why do you KEEP saying things like that Rene? If all you can do is post things like, "See that's the thing, the mods here that are clearly not capable of modding any forum still have their jobs, so I can only assume the people who review them are friends" without actually naming any Mod you think is doing a bad job then why post at all?

The name changing is hard to figure out ... until you click any one of the dozens of links littered throughout the front page of the forums. Or perhaps the topic in the announcement section that is always updated and names every Mod and their section. Damn that was hard.

I'm a liar because I believe differently than you? Okay. If it makes you happy then just keep saying the same thing over, and over, and over, without actually ever presenting any actual evidence at all. I believe you to be a scammer, you scam people all the time, and so is everyone else in TL. Wow this accusing people without proof is fun!

and...

Here come the mods to argue and treat users who dont comply like crap da da da ......!!!!


Clearly you are on the defensive here. If you dont want to know the publics educated opinion then why ask for it and then when you get it , argue it lol.

I posted suggestions to be part of the solution not the problem and yet the problem rears its ugly head.

If you valued the position over the power you wouldnt be so threatened.

When the love of power overcomes the power of love all is lost.


Yes , I was a good mod for quite a while and ...Technically ... I was "fired" or removed and Im afraid there is nothing you can say to discount my personal experience.( I can only speak to my experience and wont point any fingers) you can ignore it but not discount lol.

I was temporarily inactive at one point. More importantly was how I was treated during my activity which led to my feeling ostracized and out of the loop , powerless. Nothing i attempted to contribute within the Mod collective was accepted or appreciated or even welcomed within the what was a very disfunctional drama packed power struggle within the administrative wing of this forum at that particular time period.

This in addition to the constant beratement and aggressive hostility by upper level mods effectively facilitated my complacency and inactivity.

I would also add that I was not notified before being removed and had to ask admin why upon having my access removed ... to be told I was not active enough at that time.

Either way , I feel my experience was true to form as part of the problem with the forum.

Proactively I have consistently made 2 suggestions that would limit the damage any one mod or admin can inflict.

AGAIN...

1, 1 year time limit for moderator and administrative office. 1 year Subsequent office subject to peer review.

2, No Admin shall dually hold leadership office in an empire coalition or alliance in game.

ie , removing the or limiting the chances of abuse of power.


Thank you for asking.

Juliette wrote: In other words, you are whining about not getting a response when you do not use the proper channels of communication? Oh my, I can see why that would be an issue. I hope you can find someone to help you with that.
Sorry, but your nonsensical generalisations are obnoxious, untrue and boring. Bah. I stick my neck out for you, and this is the pathetic reaction I get?!

No, I said I stopped using your "proper channels of communication" when I never received any response...how was I supposed to know they were even going anywhere? let alone anyone reading them

whether you find my "generalisations" boring or not is not my concern. Obnoxious and untrue? no
Did I say all mods are bad at their job? no
Did I say some are incapable? yes

you stuck your neck out for me? lol how so?