Page 10 of 12

Re: ~Tziki~ Vs Be4utiful_De4th

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:39 pm
by Tekki
Your alliance harbouring Harchester meant that your alliance was doomed. Incase you hadn't noticed, he's not universally adored but I guess you don't care about things like that. Never midn though because what did Harchester ever do to protect your alliance - nothing. He just lied. as per usual.

Re: ~Tziki~ Vs Be4utiful_De4th

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:47 pm
by Juliette
GeneralChaos wrote:Is Juliette also massing BD??
Hell no, General, sir. ;) I have better things to do. :-D

Re: ~Tziki~ Vs Be4utiful_De4th

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 1:54 pm
by ~Tziki~
harch wasnt protecting anyone. just hiding from you :P

but we benefitted from each other. he helped me train newer players and offer advise, aswell as help towards buying them better accounts with ingame resources. Whilst i offered him a place to hide amongst players who didnt want to mass him, alcohol ofcourse :P and friendly banter.


oh and no GC im not related to guild. Infact untill 2 weeks or so ago id never spoken to him either, tho we have taken a shining to each other :smt050


can we now put all this arguing aside. It tires me.

BD has a very easy way out of this vendetta, nothing hugely demanding a way i see as reasonable to both parties. Lets not argue over a player who isnt even willing to argue for himself.

Let us both annoy each other until one gets bored and either submits to the rules of the vendetta, or gives up on a seemingly hopeless cause. Players like BD arent worth savoring from the "I quit" section. Id rather he stayed, but if he goes then atleast there is one less traitorous player amongst us.

Re: ~Tziki~ Vs Be4utiful_De4th

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 2:52 pm
by RBR
'....either submits to the rules of the vendetta, or gives up on a seemingly hopeless cause. Players like BD arent worth savoring from the "I quit" section. ..."
are u an educator...or something??? who cares about your rules...everyone PLAYS this game...not working at GW...lol
leave that small acc in peace..if you have "chohones" or something like that, go after the masser of Harch
like I sad before, Harch is an old fox...he can handle his affairs

Re: ~Tziki~ Vs Be4utiful_De4th

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:03 pm
by ~Tziki~
like i said. im not intrested in harch anymore. he's not my concern.

BD's actions have influenced my gaming.

Im not making rules to adhere by ingame. But i consider myself to have atleast the basic expectancy of good morals and manners. Maybe thats my english heritage showing through. But i expect nothing less of anyone else either. BD's actions were dishonorable, and still are might i add since he is refusing to comment, provoking me further and allowing others to fight his battles for him.


He is nothing more than a dishonorable coward, a liar and a traitor. My actions may appear to be bullying. But i am infact endeavoring to both appease my unrest, and prevent BD from repeating his actions in another alliance, unfortunatly there is only one way to do this. Hit him were it hurts.

However i tire of all this diplomatic **Filtered**.

BD has 2 weeks left of this vendetta. If he does not rise to the challenge or surrender, i will brand him as i have mentioned above, and be done with it.

after this it lies with any alliance he applies to as to wether they heed my warning and advise. or if they disregard it. I no longer care.


2 weeks.

Im calling you out traitor. Step up and do something if you dare.

Re: ~Tziki~ Vs Be4utiful_De4th

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:07 pm
by ~Coyle~
With his current account it isnt worth his time to try and fight back, he is well out matched and over powered, you should have known opening a vendetta like this would draw attention to yourself. And from some posts you may be getting more attention than you would like. If i recall you actions got Vodka massed how many times?

Re: ~Tziki~ Vs Be4utiful_De4th

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:23 pm
by ~Tziki~
~Coyle~ wrote:With his current account it isnt worth his time to try and fight back, he is well out matched and over powered, you should have known opening a vendetta like this would draw attention to yourself. And from some posts you may be getting more attention than you would like. If i recall you actions got Vodka massed how many times?


Im not bothered about drawing attention to myself. i can handle myself just fine.

vodka was massed for reasons outside of my control. Although myself, i believe i was massed by OE, because well, there is no way to put it that wouldnt kick that crap off again. lets just say etl didnt like a post and sent his minions in after me.

titans, hell i dont even remember why that started :P but that was a war, and we handled them fine :)

i do recall abhorsen massing myself for farming him. again that was a sniper affair. i farm his 0 def and he masses me for it. i let it slide as i dont care much for giving away free ME with no benefit to myself.

Easy massed me and stole a planet because he poked his nose in on aeonknight and thel's vendetta. in which i was acting as liason for AK whilst he was away from the game. so i stole a different planet back. we traded planets a few times until easy gave up and didnt come back again, though he didnt understand the logic in my taking a different planet once he took mine. why would i want a planet twice taken and reduced in stats when i could have one near its original size :P

i believe that is about it. though i have a terrible memory so i could be missing something.


As i have said before, this vendetta started when the balance of power was tipped in BD's favor. While i have personally farmed and grown bd hasnt, thats not my fault. He has the option of trading accounts for resources or selling resources for $$ and buying an account aswell. Not only that, i am currently unascended. as opposed to unknown status. he can kill a lot more of my men as they are weaker.

he's a coward, i am not. I continue to build and grow despite annoying people and incurring massings, BD just sits with minimal stats and lets others fight for him. I have proven that by accepting pollywogs invitation to a vendetta. he is twice my size in total armysize.

2 weeks - 14 days. Lets see if he steps up and gives me a good fight. I will match any stats he builds, for as long as i can.

if he wishes to keep hiding after this time. then i will end this and his name will be tarnished.

Id much rather congratulate him on his efforts, than slate him on his lack of effort.

Re: ~Tziki~ Vs Be4utiful_De4th

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:33 pm
by Guild
~Tziki~ wrote:oh and no GC im not related to guild. Infact untill 2 weeks or so ago id never spoken to him either, tho we have taken a shining to each other :smt050



aww now look what youve done GC !!! you just gave him a massive compliment on his good looks :smt090

muhuaha :smt050

Re: ~Tziki~ Vs Be4utiful_De4th

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:37 pm
by ~Tziki~
Guild wrote:
~Tziki~ wrote:oh and no GC im not related to guild. Infact untill 2 weeks or so ago id never spoken to him either, tho we have taken a shining to each other :smt050



aww now look what youve done GC !!! you just gave him a massive compliment on his good looks :smt090

muhuaha :smt050


i thought it more like he complimented you mate :P

ahh lets just agree we're both sexy beasts!!!

Re: ~Tziki~ Vs Be4utiful_De4th

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:43 pm
by Guild
~Tziki~ wrote:
Guild wrote:
~Tziki~ wrote:oh and no GC im not related to guild. Infact untill 2 weeks or so ago id never spoken to him either, tho we have taken a shining to each other :smt050



aww now look what youve done GC !!! you just gave him a massive compliment on his good looks :smt090

muhuaha :smt050


i thought it more like he complimented you mate :P

ahh lets just agree we're both sexy beasts!!!


i think i can compromise with that... yes..yes i can :smt112

Re: ~Tziki~ Vs Be4utiful_De4th

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 3:54 pm
by Tekki
In case you didn't notice Tziki I did not hit anyone in your alliance except for Harchester and if I recall, I didn't even mass his main account, just descended him. He continued to deny who that account was so technically I didn't even descend him as he refused to acknowledge it was himself.

And now you are starting a vendetta against someone who supposedly betrayed you? Perhaps you should consider that at least some of your alliance felt betrayed but you protecting Harchester's identity. While that may be true, and it probably is, you assume that it was BD who sold out Harchester. Let me reassure you, as the person who the information was allegedly "sold" to, he didn't. There was more than one person more than willing to give me Harchesters ID as soon as they knew I was looking.

So let’s look at this:

1. Tekki vendetta’s Harchester and attacks no one else in Vodka
2. Harchester continues to deny that the account is his
3. Others in Vodka most probably feel betrayed their alliance leader is protecting Harchester’s identity
4. Others in Vodka were not attacked despite harbouring Harchester
5. Vodka alliance dies
6. The Alliance leader blames a random member and declares a vendetta, and tries to extort the random member into repaying supposed losses, without even talking to the person who did the damage.

Your logic is astounding as always, Tziki.

Re: ~Tziki~ Vs Be4utiful_De4th

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 4:15 pm
by ~Tziki~
Tekki wrote:Your logic is astounding as always, Tziki.


as is your way of interpretting things tekki. Always have your on twist on how things happen dont you.

all members except BD were happy with Harch's place in vodka as it benefitted them. so wrong there.
BD actions are not under question. he DID sell harch out. and again this isnt about harch anymore.
i didnt say anyone was attacked for harch residing in our ranks. Although you did make an indirect threat about the consequences of doing so.

Ive learned talking to most OE members is pointless, your oppinions on things always seem to be twisted and warped to your own favor.

I didnt specify how much losses harch had, nor did i attempt to find out. As i had no reason to unless BD was willing to pay up. Its not extortion to ask for damages returned, when the player has already admitted to providing information which lead to the events, if it were extortion in this context then several courts of justice would be guilty of breaking their own laws. But again this is no longer a clause in this vendetta.

Once again i feel i must mention that someone else has failed to read what has been layed out infront of them before commenting. This 200t damages has not come from me, nor have i asked for it. I have only pm'd BD once in the last week to tell him he knows were i am should he wish to end this.

there is nothing more to discuss about the events that have transpired leading up to this vendetta. Everything has been discussed and portrayed in black and white.

BD's actions are a matter of fact. They dont need to be debated any further.

Ive given him 14 days to man up. Or have this thread closed with a written testament to how cowardly, disrespectful, and dishonorable he is.

lets just leave it at that and see what his response is. Most likely a lie and an attempt at pretending he has done nothing, as he attempted before. but no matter.



14 days...

Re: ~Tziki~ Vs Be4utiful_De4th

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 4:50 pm
by Tekki
And exactly how did BD sell out Harchester?

SELL implies BD got paid. I never pay informants.

Re: ~Tziki~ Vs Be4utiful_De4th

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 4:54 pm
by ~Tziki~
Tekki wrote:And exactly how did BD sell out Harchester?

SELL implies BD got paid. I never pay informants.


But you admit he was an informant now?

Thankyou that is all everyone needed to hear.


---

Selling someone out is a phrase used to express the act of passing on information that would negatively effect another person other than he of whom is commiting the act. Although be it for something of value in return or not. As impied by the term "Sell/Sold"

I phrased it as such, because english slang would have had me say "ratted him out", or "grassed him up" or "Stitched him up" Either of these phrases would suffice. but may have caused more confusion to those who do not understand the slang words of the english language. So i chose a more simplistic way of saying things.

Re: ~Tziki~ Vs Be4utiful_De4th

Posted: Wed Jul 27, 2011 5:03 pm
by Tekki
Where exactly do I say BD told me? If you read earlier, you will see that I VERY CLEARLY state that MULTIPLE people told me.

You are the one implying that BD got paid, not me.

Though it is equally gratifying to see that as per usual, Harchester can't do a thing against anyone. Though your ability to actually fight is in question as well with your current stats.

Though equally if you want to say that BD told me, then I'm involved in this :twisted: