Bank sizes updated

[BenjaminMS]

Jeez Jason, way to screw up!
You DO realize that de facto this only gives bigger players an advantage (as long as they're not busy ascending)? Since smaller players less likely need it.

[Iƒrit]

Jeez Jason, way to screw up!
You DO realize that de facto this only gives bigger players an advantage (as long as they're not busy ascending)? Since smaller players less likely need it.

I thought that was obvious.... as did I think it was obvious admin would do something to those who abused/exploited a bug, guess it doesn't matter or is to much effort for jason, kind of like discussing updates before implementing them....

[Rymramoch]

Why not just give everyone a 1 quad bank

I dont feel like wasting naq on covert levels while im ascending, so im stuck on an 80 tril bank with 400 million miners ... im almost out of bank space and this freaking sucks that people have 1+ quad banks with no miners.

[[BoT] Jason]

Broker to friends...But giving everyone a 1Q bank is stupid

[Black]

a bit late but eiiinn...just wanna say this affects most those who want to ascend one after another, you don't just keep building high coverl level and you do need a lot naq in order to ascend

[[BoT] Jason]

If you're already ascended I know many trustworty people that would gratefully hold naq for you....

[Eisen Feuer]

Sorry I am necro-ing this thread but a friend of mine and I just realized that one of the bugs this caused was never fixed. My friend had used alliance funds over a long period of time to get an almost 2quad bank space. One of the proposed ideas of this update was "If your total bank capacity was above the cost of your next covert level; no change." My friend lost over 1quad bank space and all the alliance funds that were used in because of this update. Why was this not fixed and when could this be fixed?

Please and thank you for your time.