Page 10 of 12

Re: The Order Vs TF

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 8:15 pm
by Flintcawk
Super Guards 5,000,197

Re: The Order Vs TF

Posted: Mon Feb 01, 2016 9:48 pm
by Mathlord
So pray tell Tziki, are you going to buy a nice new account with which to fight? Or are you just going to sit with a baby account and do nothing but raise naq to sell on the side? If it's the latter, then you have dumped your alliance into a war they are incapable of fighting and run off to do bigger and better things with your life.

Hey it's your prerogative to do what you think is best for you, but from one person in an alliance leadership position to another, if I had instigated a war, I'd stick around long enough to at least try and resolve it before leaving your lambs to the slaughter.

Everything about you is amusing Tzikklesticks. You fali at fighting. You fail at diplomacy. You fail at debating. Maybe The Order is better off without you after all.

Re: The Order Vs TF

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2016 5:41 am
by ~Tziki~
You shall have to wait and find out.

Not that it would matter, you would still find a way to delude yourself of the truth behind anything. So you might aswell make up a story now, as the facts clearly dont mean much to you anyway.

Re: The Order Vs TF

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2016 7:35 am
by D3ath
haha damn i was always saying that karma is a bltch :D i cant stop laughing

taf always does the opposite of what they talk and say they stand for :D i remember the days when they flamed dde that we let our players loose and troll them and annoy them and they were so angry about it and saying how bad it is and that they are not like that and wouldnt ever do it :D and now doing same things some months later :D getting dirty their angel face :D

but hey everyone else already seen ages ago that they are worst of all with all of their bs :D its no surprise that their own decent hc members are finally realizing that and leaving them.

Re: The Order Vs TF

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2016 10:58 am
by ~Tziki~
D3ath wrote:haha damn i was always saying that karma is a bltch :D i cant stop laughing

taf always does the opposite of what they talk and say they stand for :D i remember the days when they flamed dde that we let our players loose and troll them and annoy them and they were so angry about it and saying how bad it is and that they are not like that and wouldnt ever do it :D and now doing same things some months later :D getting dirty their angel face :D

but hey everyone else already seen ages ago that they are worst of all with all of their bs :D its no surprise that their own decent hc members are finally realizing that and leaving them.
They had decent HC members? O.o

Re: The Order Vs TF

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2016 11:14 am
by Flintcawk
Lol

Re: The Order Vs TF

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2016 12:52 pm
by Xane
I am hereby offering my surrender for my main account 56762 (Xane) and my ngm 1996251 (*Sloane) and the associated ascended accounts. (xane and *taegu cba to look up ids but those are the names). I am applying with another alliance not in war. Was fun had fun but I need a little downtime to actually work on building account to an acceptable level!

Re: The Order Vs TF

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2016 1:08 pm
by Duderanch
Lol xane hitting Hokie that instigated this and they both gone. :smt043

Re: The Order Vs TF

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2016 1:22 pm
by ~Tziki~
Duderanch wrote:Lol xane hitting Hokie that instigated this and they both gone. :smt043
I wouldnt say instigated, more so hokie trying to abuse a treaty to get the best of both worlds.
What instigated it, is people not taking responsibility for failures to act / upholding treaties afterwards.


But i do admit, i find this recent turn of events rather humerous aswell. ](*,)

Re: The Order Vs TF

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2016 2:57 pm
by Mathlord
~Tziki~ wrote:
Duderanch wrote:Lol xane hitting Hokie that instigated this and they both gone. :smt043
I wouldnt say instigated, more so hokie trying to abuse a treaty to get the best of both worlds.
What instigated it, is people not taking responsibility for failures to act / upholding treaties afterwards.


But i do admit, i find this recent turn of events rather humerous aswell. ](*,)
Hokie wasn't even TF at that point. This all happened after you showed up in our logs well over 100 times in a single day. We might be friendly and more chill than DDE, but we're not that friendly...there was going to be no treaty renewal following that. Only reason we didn't mass you was because we wanted to hold to our word and ride out the treaty we agreed to.

It's all moot. You wanted TO to escape the Ragnarok, have time to rebuild, then you pushed our buttons to get our war to come back and now that you realized how foolish you were, you are selling off and taking yourself out of the equation for fighting, leaving whoever is left in TO to hold down the fort best they can. It's okay, I'm sure your little multi will be a great help to the war effort...

Re: The Order Vs TF

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2016 2:59 pm
by Mathlord
Xane wrote:I am hereby offering my surrender for my main account 56762 (Xane) and my ngm 1996251 (*Sloane) and the associated ascended accounts. (xane and *taegu cba to look up ids but those are the names). I am applying with another alliance not in war. Was fun had fun but I need a little downtime to actually work on building account to an acceptable level!
Your surrender has been accepted, best of luck in your future endeavors.

Re: The Order Vs TF

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2016 3:25 pm
by ~Tziki~
If you say so math =D>
How amusing.

Re: The Order Vs TF

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2016 4:01 pm
by Flintcawk
~Tziki~ wrote:If you say so math =D>
How amusing.
All you are is a jar of words

Re: The Order Vs TF

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2016 4:05 pm
by ~Rikki~™
Nicky :smt089 :smt021

Re: The Order Vs TF

Posted: Tue Feb 02, 2016 4:06 pm
by Flintcawk
~Rikki~™ wrote:Nicky :smt089 :smt021
Hey bud :smt060
Our onliner still on for tonight?