Page 10 of 10

Re: Are you pleased that Tok`ra is gone?

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 12:07 am
by Mystake
i still wanna know wat im supposed to be banned for, eh borek

Re: Are you pleased that Tok`ra is gone?

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 12:07 am
by arovean
Jack wrote:I wander who nuked the poll? Don't matter, here's the results of the poll someone doesn't want you to see.


Image


Bare in mind this is the results of the poll just before the delete, I do not believe there were any more votes between the time this was taken and when the poll was deleted


Hope your reply does not get nuked either.

huh.....very suspicious.

Never-teeh-less, this topic getting interesting by the reply

Re: Are you pleased that Tok`ra is gone?

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 12:15 am
by Nuto vixen
I told the author of the thread about what happened to the poll he created, and he deleted it.

Obviously he agreed that the poll was falsified with multies, and decided it was best to just judge who is happy and who is not with some good old fashioned posting.

I think its a good idea. No more tinkering to prove a point, just the opinions of people via posting.

*cheers with pom poms*

GOOOOOOOOOOOOO posting! :-D

Re: Are you pleased that Tok`ra is gone?

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 12:20 am
by Jack_White
I like having him around, he actually had some good points from time to time :)

Re: Are you pleased that Tok`ra is gone?

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 12:32 am
by Nuto vixen
good for you.
you obviously weren't around at the time of the sudden burst of "no" votes and old accounts logging in.

Re: Are you pleased that Tok`ra is gone?

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 12:43 am
by Nuto vixen
https://talk.gatewa.rs/viewtopic.php?f=101&t=91882

Hold up, wasn't this you?

"YEAH FOR FORUM! :smt041"

5th response in that thread.

Someone has changed their tune. 8)

Re: Are you pleased that Tok`ra is gone?

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 12:44 am
by Psi Kiya Trist
alright, for anyone who thinks he hasn't earned this ban, because of no rule violations supplied thus far. i have three since his last suspension. and the standard for this forum is three warnings, and then suspension. this is suspension 5+ for tok`ra, therefor, he's had plenty of time to work through his "issues".

evidence #1:
calling a forum user a pedophile. Nuto will recall this incident, because a statement was made: "now you're asking for a pedophile scandal" which was followed up by Tok`ra asking if one person was invited, while quoting said post. this is the second instance of him posting something such as this. which, if you care to realize, is a violation of the second commandment. "extreme direct insults to a person" two violations.

evidence #2:
Duplicate topics: Can the supermods (not all, but some) please grow up ?

posted three times with the same content. violation of commandment 9. at least one violation.

strike three.

he earned a ban. he reaps what he sows.

~_+Psi Kiya Trist+_~

Re: Are you pleased that Tok`ra is gone?

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 12:53 am
by Nuto vixen
no, I blame you.

you can't always hate the game, sometimes it is actually the players.

Re: Are you pleased that Tok`ra is gone?

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:10 am
by Nuto vixen
This is a forum... not a government. lol, you want to be "important"? Go do some volunteering at an old persons home, or read to the blind.

You shouldn't be coming here if its just for a sense of self importance. It's probably not going to happen.

Re: Are you pleased that Tok`ra is gone?

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:14 am
by arovean
Nuto vixen wrote:This is a forum... not a government. lol, you want to be "important"? Go do some volunteering at an old persons home, or read to the blind.

You shouldn't be coming here if its just for a sense of self importance. It's probably not going to happen.


Did he attack you (Jack) in-game too.
:shock:

Or did we forget about SGW in the heat this discussion.

Re: Are you pleased that Tok`ra is gone?

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:29 am
by Myseri
People More Recently Posting Against Tok'ra
Nuto Vixen
Psi Kiya Tryst

People More Recently Posting For Tok'ra
Mr Mystake
arovean
Jack_White
Jack
Dyneasty

People Who Aren't For or Against
Bladeswin

Wow Nuto, you said let the people who post actually show how he is liked or disliked. In my opinion, and my current view of this thread. It seems more peoplare against what happened to him... More recently it has been you and Borek backing up Forum's decision. Against you are Bladeswin, Mr. Mystake, and Jack. Still that puts a majority against you, so I don't see how they are a minority.

You want to know why I put my name in for SUPPORTING Tok'ra. Well here you go.

He may have annoying posts, yes. But you can always CHOSE TO NOT read them. I mean you see his name, you skip on past it. Boo hoo. That is the same for the threads he created. You saw his name, you scrolled on downwards. Wow is it really that hard?

Also you want to know why he poked and prodded at the moderators? It is because they don't do much. I mean I have seen many rules broken, has anything happened? No. That is because they aren't doing their job. If they aren't doing their job, then why the hell are they moderators?! This is why Tok'ra did that.

He did have a point to "SGW General" not being defined. You could put something such as: "SGW Drag show" in a thread and have it as a competition to see who the best would look in women's clothing among active players. That would still technically be in SGW General, not spam, as it is SGW related because you are relating to the players. There has to be EXACT rules of what CAN and CANNOT be posted in this thread to avoid what Tok'ra was doing. He was trying to show this, in his own special way.

Oh about calling you a pedophile. Didn't you call Apollo a pedophile a while back?! I could of sworn I had seen something along those lines in which you were involved.

Dadigi was a crappy mod. Why are they so special to get elite treatement from forum? Dadigi shouldn't of been "changed" they should of just been a normal member again as they weren't good at their job.

Good Moderators are the ones who do their job, and do it without saying their opinion on the matter. Here is an example:

Bob says: You are a <censored> (not censored in his original post)
Mod comes in and changes the foul word to <censored>
Mod sends PM to Bob saying he was warned for his breaking of rule X
Mod makes a note in the Moderator forum noting that Bob was warned for breaking rule X.

Simple as that. If they close a post, have it be for a legit reason:

Creator asked it to be locked
Breaking a Rule
Multiple Thread on Topic

Legit reasons such as that, not ones that they didn't agree. Which I might reference again, there were times that you had threads locked as you didn't like the opinion of what was being said... but yet it once again slips my mind.

Psi Kiya Tryst. Isn't it said that if you break a rule you are warned. If you then break the rule again, you are SUSPENDED. Why make a special occasion just for one player. He had not been SUSPENDED on this account for the rule. Also learn to count!

Strike One: Calling Nuto a Pedophile

Strike Two: Breaking a rule repeatedly and NOT SUSPENDED

Strike Three: ?

Finally, I am quite curiously, did Nuto get a warning when she called Apollo a pedophile?

Re: Are you pleased that Tok`ra is gone?

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:39 am
by buck
Hmmm, I hope noone else stole his recently aquired catchphrase, cos im about to use it...

Here Comes The Pain!!!!!

And im gunna stop you right there Myseri and Everyone else, Because Forum made a topic Stateing That no more needed to be said about his banning, So im gunna go ahead and shut this.

Re: Are you pleased that Tok`ra is gone?

Posted: Sat Nov 10, 2007 6:31 am
by FreeSpirit
I know this topic is locked but i have to make a reply for our dear 7chan visitors. So what if you have faster hands on a comp. It only means you can have a **Filtered** faster then we can ;). I surely hope the people who are part of this community and are helping 7chan realise that i will not hold back on the bannings when i find out the entire list of people from here involved. So far 2 names are mentioned and i have proof you 2 are involved.