Re: Ragnarök
Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 9:55 am
600m for 164m.. lol yep very over powered
These are the forums for the GateWa.rs family of text-based space-centred PBBGs
https://talk.gatewa.rs/
Still more even ratios than High Empty attacking things haha~Dä Vinci~ wrote:600m for 164m.. lol yep very over powered
Rodwolf wrote:Congrats Defdragon352 (seems you did the heavy pounding)
I reset my ME for this one. Also I was not around to defend (work,doing groceries and such)
[spoiler]Attack Mercs Killed (30) 19,440,552
Defence Mercs Killed (10) 0
Attack Soldiers Killed(60) 40
Defence Soldiers Killed(20) 0
Attack Super Soldiers Killed(300) 164,656,118
Defence Super Soldiers Killed(100) 0
Spies Killed(50) 914,138
Spy Killers Killed(50) 0
Mothership Weapons Destroyed(300) 2,009,028
Mothership Shields Destroyed(300) 611,767
Mothership Fleets Destroyed(200) 0
Planet Defences Destroyed(300) 0
Planets Taken(5000) 0
Naquadah Stolen(0.0001) 0
Untrained Kidnapped(50) 0
Weapon Points Destroyed (Sab+Att)(0.0001) 2,885,810,770,846
Attack Turns Used(1) 0
TOTAL WAR EXPERIENCE POINTS 51,100,580,837
Your Failures
Attacking Mercenaries Lost 0
Defending Mercenaries Lost 0
Away Team Lost 0
Home Guard Lost 0
Super Soldier Lost 0
Super Guards Lost 612,557,568
Covert Ops Lost 210,017,979
CounterIntelligence Agents Lost 0
Mothership Weapons Lost 878,779
Mothership Shields Lost 779,258
Mothership Fleets Lost 251,168
Planet Defences Lost 0
Planets Lost 0
Naquadah Lost 450,008,542,049
Untrained Lost 0
Weapon Points Destroyed (Sab+Att on You) 4,209,000,000,000
Attack Turns Used Against You 2,166
War Points Value of Losses (just as FYI) 72,770,203,470[/spoiler]
I assume you used Double strike? Shows again how overpowered it is actually.
Lets see if I can save up again to give it another shot(wont be the coming month though)
True,Mathlord wrote:Still more even ratios than High Empty attacking things haha~Dä Vinci~ wrote:600m for 164m.. lol yep very over powered
Yeah, that's a nice ratio for defdragon. Truth is the ratios of big massings depends heavily on the luck of the ascended blessings. I guess the luck was on TAFs side today.~Dä Vinci~ wrote:600m for 164m.. lol yep very over powered
Norbe wrote:It was a fun afternoon trying to plan and execute this little endeavor. Thinking about it I really have been around when a lot of the big massings in history have gone down. It's was a privilege to be part of this one too.
Yeah, that's a nice ratio for defdragon. Truth is the ratios of big massings depends heavily on the luck of the ascended blessings. I guess the luck was on TAFs side today.~Dä Vinci~ wrote:600m for 164m.. lol yep very over powered
DDE did a good job of trying to sit on our repair naq. And yes, I got lifered a bit when i'd finished AC'ing!
~Norbe~
And Double Strike, massive losses without thatNorbe wrote:It was a fun afternoon trying to plan and execute this little endeavor. Thinking about it I really have been around when a lot of the big massings in history have gone down. It's was a privilege to be part of this one too.
Yeah, that's a nice ratio for defdragon. Truth is the ratios of big massings depends heavily on the luck of the ascended blessings. I guess the luck was on TAFs side today.~Dä Vinci~ wrote:600m for 164m.. lol yep very over powered
DDE did a good job of trying to sit on our repair naq. And yes, I got lifered a bit when i'd finished AC'ing!
~Norbe~
lol stupid for the defender^^~Dä Vinci~ wrote:600m for 164m.. lol yep very over powered
+1. I've never had a problem with double gives smaller players ground to stand on against huge mses and planets. Its g phase that's a joke.Mathlord wrote:You know I normally was not a fan of the double strike, but in a world of ridiculous att/def duals...a double strike might serve as a nice balancing act to keep them in check.
Indeed I feel the same, and ill have you all know there was no glory phase used todayZ E R O wrote:+1. I've never had a problem with double gives smaller players ground to stand on against huge mses and planets. Its g phase that's a joke.Mathlord wrote:You know I normally was not a fan of the double strike, but in a world of ridiculous att/def duals...a double strike might serve as a nice balancing act to keep them in check.
Well then maybe do something about att/defense duals, pointless me building big defences if everytime its massed is with DS or some lad with massive att/defence duals taking minimal losses, its lose/lose for meMathlord wrote:You know I normally was not a fan of the double strike, but in a world of ridiculous att/def duals...a double strike might serve as a nice balancing act to keep them in check.