Page 2 of 6
Re: what's the community's opinion on this?
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 3:57 am
by REK
Wolf359 wrote:REK wrote:Alliance A won alliance B is now a second rate resistance in occupied terroritory

That's a good way of looking at it - with alliance B resorting to 'guerilla' tactics.
meh more like terrorists they attacks undefended weaker targets

Re: what's the community's opinion on this?
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:23 am
by noone
A's on the winning hand. Is more active, has taken more resources, destroyed more.
Unless B gets very active, they better surrender, guerilla tactics or not, they have already been outmatched.
Any other choice then surrendering and admitting defeat will lead to a slow death for B >.>
Re: what's the community's opinion on this?
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:28 am
by Omega Blade
I think A is getting pissed because they cant do anything.. for B is actually winning if u really see. since A has alot of big players with big incomes when they are massed B which has alot of small players can nicely farm them and grow.. but since B is small mostly, A has nothing to farm and they want to stop this for they knw they cant win this war.. Thats why they are trying to push B into surrendering for they knw that they are actually losing.. Maybe if A posts stats not on massing but on how big they got from army size to army size, because of the war and not because of the up.. we will see that B has players who have grown alot. and after they grow to a limit they als ocan start massing others since they got big account, now. So B is actually wining.
In short .. A cant grow much and are losing more because of this war than gaining because they are too big compared to B. and since B is mostly small players with alittle big guys to mass some defences down.. they are gaining and will start to show that there army size is growing and with a little lecture from the big guys they also can start massing down defences. so they will grow and mass and grow and mass.. like that. the only way A can defeat B is by surrendering. its sounds illogical but the only way to beat B is by surrendering to them.
to prove my time just see in all the topics they open they are tyring to push B into surrendering saying only because there defences are massed and they got more power. they dont realise that B doesnt need to mass them to farm there income they have alot more account which are massable and can get alot of naq. and A can do nothing about it..
unless i am missing sumthing and B is really inactive and only the big guys are active then i say no chance for B they must surrender before there merlin drops low or before there army size drops low. but if B is active then keep at it u will see improvement in your whole alliance.
my 2 cents
Re: what's the community's opinion on this?
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:35 am
by RepliJake
If you read, B is not massing the big players in A so are therefore not "farming nicely" they are consistently shrinking out of existence.
Re: what's the community's opinion on this?
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:36 am
by REK
no no you are wrong B has shrunk!
Re: what's the community's opinion on this?
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:38 am
by noone
REK wrote:no no you are wrong B has shrunk!
I believe thats what pain said.
Re: what's the community's opinion on this?
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:41 am
by RepliJake
Who you calling Pain?
Re: what's the community's opinion on this?
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:44 am
by noone
General Pain I wrote:Who you calling Pain?
Well, you actually, I could call you Pain I though if you like

Re: what's the community's opinion on this?
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:58 am
by SVaRuN
Thats from Naruto...
And pain is actually an entity from 6 bodies..are you acusing Jake of multying
Blue
Re: what's the community's opinion on this?
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:00 am
by noone
SVaRuN wrote:Thats from Naruto...
And pain is actually an entity form 6 bodies..are you acusing Jake of multying
Blue
ghehe, dunno, should I
anywayszz wasn't referring to that pain ^_^
Re: what's the community's opinion on this?
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 5:12 am
by Shornaal
A has already won, B should surrender
Re: what's the community's opinion on this?
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 6:26 am
by Mordack
Well, Omega Blade, that's certainly an "original" way of looking at things.
I agree with SVaRuN; B need to rethink their strategy, otherwise they've lost already.
Re: what's the community's opinion on this?
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:29 am
by V|per
If B doesn't start massing A's defences soon, they will have to admit their defeat 21% 21% [ 5 ] x

Re: what's the community's opinion on this?
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 7:51 am
by Hansbrough
I'm curious to see what's up B's sleeve. I know they're plotting something (at least I hope they are)...
I think it's too early for A to declare complete victory over B, as B apparently are up to something.
That said I'm not sure what B can do to overcome A to even come remotely close to "winning" at this point.
Re: what's the community's opinion on this?
Posted: Tue Jan 22, 2008 8:00 am
by REK
Taxonomist3 wrote:I'm curious to see what's up B's sleeve. I know they're plotting something (at least I hope they are)...
I think it's too early for A to declare complete victory over B, as B apparently are up to something.
That said I'm not sure what B can do to overcome A to even come remotely close to "winning" at this point.
A was declared victor with its fake fishing thread that made B shat its pants
