StarGateWars Forums

could be a counter bug-bug... as far as I can tell though its an SQL error, but it doesnt seem to be affecting anyone... if theres an error there though I'd worry about sql injection... but i dont want to try and see coz I'd probably be in trouble for it

I know didly squat about code, unix blah blah ect ect, What I see is after I have banked my naq i see this 1e code, i read alot of the forums when I get a chance and I hear things also in msn convos

if you take anything said, sometimes you end up asking yourself questions

yes it may be a counter bug to deal with what ever possible loops, bugs or breaches either taken taking or future loops, and maybe its something that was simple, easy and because no one seemingly gets hurt or looses, a bug abuse.

Its a good idea to post these things, and if admin are subject to unautherised database code, then we would of highlighted an area to examine

I would rather post 10 things that are not a real problem than ignore 1 that affects the sgw community, I have as others, lost to bugs, I have even stupidly used a bug, and paid for it, (when we all had trillions of naq and hundreds of millions of uu, I wanted to see how much per turn I could get if everything went to miners, I lost trillions of my own naq in weapons cos admin did not give them back, but hey thats my problem I should of just ignored it, instead I paid for it lmao)

I would like to see admin either confirm this or at least give an explanation as to its reasoning, does it happen to mercs buying ect? I have not seen nor tried

thorslittleworld wrote:I know didly squat about code, unix blah blah ect ect, What I see is after I have banked my naq i see this 1e code, i read alot of the forums when I get a chance and I hear things also in msn convos

if you take anything said, sometimes you end up asking yourself questions

yes it may be a counter bug to deal with what ever possible loops, bugs or breaches either taken taking or future loops, and maybe its something that was simple, easy and because no one seemingly gets hurt or looses, a bug abuse.

Its a good idea to post these things, and if admin are subject to unautherised database code, then we would of highlighted an area to examine

I would rather post 10 things that are not a real problem than ignore 1 that affects the sgw community, I have as others, lost to bugs, I have even stupidly used a bug, and paid for it, (when we all had trillions of naq and hundreds of millions of uu, I wanted to see how much per turn I could get if everything went to miners, I lost trillions of my own naq in weapons cos admin did not give them back, but hey thats my problem I should of just ignored it, instead I paid for it lmao)

I would like to see admin either confirm this or at least give an explanation as to its reasoning, does it happen to mercs buying ect? I have not seen nor tried

umm... as far as I could understand you are saying a) theres a bug b) you dont know anything about it and c) you want admin to look at it.

blame it on my not sleeping all night, but most of your post didn't make any sense to me.

<aside>
anyone hear anything from admin-or know anything else about this?
</aside>

cyberblade wrote:

thorslittleworld wrote:I know didly squat about code, unix blah blah ect ect, What I see is after I have banked my naq i see this 1e code, i read alot of the forums when I get a chance and I hear things also in msn convos

if you take anything said, sometimes you end up asking yourself questions

yes it may be a counter bug to deal with what ever possible loops, bugs or breaches either taken taking or future loops, and maybe its something that was simple, easy and because no one seemingly gets hurt or looses, a bug abuse.

Its a good idea to post these things, and if admin are subject to unautherised database code, then we would of highlighted an area to examine

I would rather post 10 things that are not a real problem than ignore 1 that affects the sgw community, I have as others, lost to bugs, I have even stupidly used a bug, and paid for it, (when we all had trillions of naq and hundreds of millions of uu, I wanted to see how much per turn I could get if everything went to miners, I lost trillions of my own naq in weapons cos admin did not give them back, but hey thats my problem I should of just ignored it, instead I paid for it lmao)

I would like to see admin either confirm this or at least give an explanation as to its reasoning, does it happen to mercs buying ect? I have not seen nor tried

umm... as far as I could understand you are saying a) theres a bug b) you dont know anything about it and c) you want admin to look at it.

blame it on my not sleeping all night, but most of your post didn't make any sense to me.

<aside>
anyone hear anything from admin-or know anything else about this?
</aside>

Please dont go overboard on the exact wording, it was simple, something was seen by several people that was not there before, and so as others thought it best, reported it as a possible bug

I looked at that possible bug and thought about suttles, and raised the possible question that they were tied, and maybe, just maybe, if it was, it may of been something that was suttle, yet still noticed, if admin knows about it then its cool, if admin didnt know about it then I raised the possible question of involvement then it would be changed

Nutter wrote:Glad i checked this topic, was just about to make my own, as other people said... its only when you have nothing out in the open to bank

Ah well... it cant be anything major can it?

same here I thought I would check here before posting something on it so dose anyone know what it could be and if it is going to affect the banks any?

Indeed it is game wide, i feel it is not a bug as Admin would have changed it buy now if it war

its just 115 naq, whats the prob of having that or 0

its the same thing has writing 115, but its in a float format

probably there to prevent something, or to test something

Nox wrote:its just 115 naq, whats the prob of having that or 0

its the same thing has writing 115, but its in a float format

probably there to prevent something, or to test something

Umm, no... it's 1,000,000,000,000,000 naq... a quadrillion, unless I'm mistaken.

thats the math result of 1E+15 yes

but admin put it at 115 naq, thats probably the bug that suttles guy was using to have big amounts of naq, using php functions directly in the forms, now this stops it so whats the problem if it shows in the bank, if it stops cheats by all means, put whatever u want admin

well, afaik we don't know why its actually there.