Page 2 of 3
Re: it might've been tasteless, but is it a rule?
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 2:46 pm
by Legendary Apophis
Psi Kiya Trist wrote:SA. wrote:Why not try using vocabulary that would not require modding?
I mean you're typing its not like you just say it without thinking you have to write the words down...
because english isn't his first language, and you know what they say about learning new languages... you always learn the swear words first.
~_+Psi Kiya Trist+_~
LoL couldn't have said it better lmao
Though I expect to be seen higher than the level of first tries with swear words...or is my englsh full of modded rude words I don't know of?
And how could I be respectfull to someone like this? Must be worse person using forums by now! Insulting a passed out person AND making look like a religion and its followers look very bad. That's bottom of all
Re: it might've been tasteless, but is it a rule?
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 3:07 pm
by Mystake
ok, well swearing is direspectful to everyone else who will read your post
oh and don't say "they can skip it if they don't like it" they won't know it until they read it.
Re: it might've been tasteless, but is it a rule?
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 3:14 pm
by Donovan5
Judochop wrote:Archon wrote:I found his posts verry offensive and think he should be banned forever, so offensive in fact that if i met him in the street I would have beaten him with a crowbar
I concur.
I concur with your concurrance. Boy would it be a mess afterwards.
Re: it might've been tasteless, but is it a rule?
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 3:29 pm
by smooshable
Out of curiosity what specifically were you offended by? There were so many reasons to be offended.
Three main ones come to mind:
1. Offending the memory of a (presumed to be) dead member of our community.
2. Using an emotional event like the (again, presumed) death of a member of our community to ellicit fear and hatred of muslim people.
3. A more general sense of being offended by being exposed to someone like him who for what ever motivation decided to do this.
Re: it might've been tasteless, but is it a rule?
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:08 pm
by Bull-E
ok now im curuios
can someone om me what he said plz?
Re: it might've been tasteless, but is it a rule?
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:23 pm
by Envy
smooshable wrote:Out of curiosity what specifically were you offended by? There were so many reasons to be offended.
Three main ones come to mind:
1. Offending the memory of a (presumed to be) dead member of our community.
2. Using an emotional event like the (again, presumed) death of a member of our community to ellicit fear and hatred of muslim people.
3. A more general sense of being offended by being exposed to someone like him who for what ever motivation decided to do this.
All treu m8 I vote for the life time ban wait can we vote ?

Re: it might've been tasteless, but is it a rule?
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:26 pm
by Envy
Mr Mystake wrote:ok, well swearing is direspectful to everyone else who will read your post
oh and don't say "they can skip it if they don't like it" they won't know it until they read it.
I dont know Mystake theirs something like ignoring for example.
Btw why suddenly bring up a lowlife banned person ? isn't their enuff hatred already ?
Re: it might've been tasteless, but is it a rule?
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:40 pm
by ~Massin4Christ~
Sorry but insulting someone deceased should be an AUTOMATIC PERMA BAN!!!
As for racism it should be a month or two ban!. As we are all the same in God's eyes...
Re: it might've been tasteless, but is it a rule?
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:44 pm
by semper
Insulting someone deceased = who gives a flying toss! They are dead! GONE! Goodnight Vienna! Sleeping with the fishies....
Insulting someone deceased IN FRONT of people who knew them = ONE warning per person that knows the recently deceased viewing the thread.
Racism? WTH! Stop being a bunch of bloody sheep and get your own God dam minds with a slither of logical thinking! Its no different then any other insult and should be treated accordingly. Racism = same as insulting a regular forum user. IF you weally want it to be speshul for de ickle childwen then slap a similar rule to the latter deceased one on it, otherwise your just being stupid.
Re: it might've been tasteless, but is it a rule?
Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2008 7:58 pm
by Envy
lmao ... Semper ur a kid how can people possible discussings things properly in front of u when u dont seem to have a bit understanding.
So Semper u find it normal people stopping by and insulting ur mother or go laughing with people with cancer,aids,...etc etc laughing with religions or believes...
ur owk with that ? lmao typical kiddo talk. But what do we suspect from Semper eh
p.s Semper ur 18 eh how immature can u get at that age
Re: it might've been tasteless, but is it a rule?
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 12:15 am
by Brdavs
So if got this right we have this Dude Co that (may or may not - seperate and undecided issue) died in Iraq. And we have this merrickwazoo who took a swipe at him / Iraq as they were against his political views? (sry if I got it wrong)
If so:
I`m only gonna chuckle in glee cos the conformation of my statemet in zerathuls pakistani episode thread that "some things will fly and others most certainly will not" came so hillariously fast heh... "Permaban for the guy that doubted those going in Iraq are champions for freedom! Sand-niggers smell? lolz we all think it."
merrickwazoo does deserve to be banned. But only cos he`s stupid enough to not know which arena is apporpriate for which type of politicaly coloured stance/bandther. Choose the environment more carefully next time lad.

Re: it might've been tasteless, but is it a rule?
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 12:59 am
by Zeratul
Donovan5 wrote:Judochop wrote:Archon wrote:I found his posts verry offensive and think he should be banned forever, so offensive in fact that if i met him in the street I would have beaten him with a crowbar
I concur.
I concur with your concurrance. Boy would it be a mess afterwards.
do you people normally carry crowbars when walking on the street?
Re: it might've been tasteless, but is it a rule?
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 1:55 am
by FreeSpirit
Zeratul wrote:Donovan5 wrote:Judochop wrote:Archon wrote:I found his posts verry offensive and think he should be banned forever, so offensive in fact that if i met him in the street I would have beaten him with a crowbar
I concur.
I concur with your concurrance. Boy would it be a mess afterwards.
do you people normally carry crowbars when walking on the street?
I always have on in my back pocket. You never know when it comes handy
Re: it might've been tasteless, but is it a rule?
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 2:10 am
by Bazsy
Just 2 short lines from me:
-Its not 1, but 2 weeks (can be more if we see fit)
-Common sense anyone?!
Re: it might've been tasteless, but is it a rule?
Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2008 3:11 am
by Legendary Apophis
Mr Mystake wrote:ok, well swearing is direspectful to everyone else who will read your post
oh and don't say "they can skip it if they don't like it" they won't know it until they read it.
Being disrespectful to such person is respectful to others as it shows you don't like this person who came only to flame and insult, while you did NOT say ANY rude word, but had the meaning behind

Brdavs wrote:So if got this right we have this Dude Co that (may or may not - seperate and undecided issue) died in Iraq. And we have this merrickwazoo who took a swipe at him / Iraq as they were against his political views? (sry if I got it wrong)
If so:
I`m only gonna chuckle in glee cos the conformation of my statemet in zerathuls pakistani episode thread that "some things will fly and others most certainly will not" came so hillariously fast heh... "Permaban for the guy that doubted those going in Iraq are champions for freedom! Sand-niggers smell? lolz we all think it."
merrickwazoo does deserve to be banned. But only cos he`s stupid enough to not know which arena is apporpriate for which type of politicaly coloured stance/bandther. Choose the environment more carefully next time lad.

You are somehow right, but this dude came here ONLY for this, so he could have said anything to any ethny or country, I would have condemned it, and he also insulted a person deceased, how is it good? And peoplle please don't bring the "yes but do you respect as much nazis and h1tler as they are now deceased?", because you know I do NOT respect them because what they did is enough terrible to cross the respect line to passed away people, according to me.