Page 2 of 3

Re: NO.1

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 5:26 am
by Juliette
Mordack wrote:
Vegito_ wrote:
alex3 wrote:so mojo isnt even close to being the person thats stayed at NO.1 for the longest? or hes in top 3 or 4? what?


sorry m8, time for new a new hero

i hear Mordack is free????


Being rank one on both servers simultaneously is on my list of 'things to do on SGW before I quit.'


Didn't Sinister say the same thing, literally? :)

Re: NO.1

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:47 am
by blahh
well be4 there was market, and $ infused accounts or anything even gained from trading either ingame or $...
i remember Lindstorm (probably messed up the spelling) holding rank 1 for quite a long time.

Re: NO.1

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:43 am
by Chris M
blahh wrote:well be4 there was market, and $ infused accounts or anything even gained from trading either ingame or $...
i remember Lindstorm (probably messed up the spelling) holding rank 1 for quite a long time.

correct spelling indeed
i would say STI was top longest on main of recent times
and mojo rising was on ascended for ages, although he and sinister swapped around a bit

Re: NO.1

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 9:52 am
by Lord Priape
This is not the first time I have held the #1 Spot. The first time I had the #1 rank was before resource market. I have no where near the longevity at rank 1 of the other players mentioned above and i doubt I will be able to hold on the rank for long. The plague is making it very challenging to keep ahold of the #1 rank. Loosing 15,000 trained troops a turn reeks havoc on your action levels.

Priape

Re: NO.1

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:11 am
by SVaRuN
Lindsotrm is a SLO dude...so yay...and I thought I had to save the honour..




Blue

Re: NO.1

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 10:50 am
by Mordack
Auriel wrote:
Mordack wrote:
Vegito_ wrote:
alex3 wrote:so mojo isnt even close to being the person thats stayed at NO.1 for the longest? or hes in top 3 or 4? what?


sorry m8, time for new a new hero

i hear Mordack is free????


Being rank one on both servers simultaneously is on my list of 'things to do on SGW before I quit.'


Didn't Sinister say the same thing, literally? :)


He may have done.. as it's the kind of symbolic achievement which I daresay many players aspire to. It's a waste of resources at the end of the day, but I'd like to add it to my SGW resume nonetheless.

Re: NO.1

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:03 am
by Juliette
Mordack wrote:
Auriel wrote:Didn't Sinister say the same thing, literally? :)

He may have done.. as it's the kind of symbolic achievement which I daresay many players aspire to. It's a waste of resources at the end of the day, but I'd like to add it to my SGW resume nonetheless.

Indeed.. and understandably so. One would have to torment their accounts to reach it.. but the bragging rights last forever. ;)

Re: NO.1

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:04 am
by ~Artanis~
lol JUAN :lol: .......brings back memories :-D

I remember that after I started playing SGW (february 2006) there were rumours going on that he had a 70k raw up.........
lol and I thought when I saw SGC with a 30k raw that that was good.....
I could only dream about such up,had like 3k at that time :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: NO.1

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:11 pm
by alex3
i kinda wish that it was impossible to buy recourses with $. cause then it would be fair for everybody. :(

Re: NO.1

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 3:22 pm
by RepliMagni
To make it "fair for everybody" you'd need to restrict the amount of time people can play per day, and a whole host of other things.

I know people who spend several hours a day raiding....or I know people who work in RL and spend some of that $$$ on the game.....which is a more legitimate way to grow?

Re: NO.1

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:19 pm
by alex3
[TO]Magni wrote:To make it "fair for everybody" you'd need to restrict the amount of time people can play per day, and a whole host of other things.

I know people who spend several hours a day raiding....or I know people who work in RL and spend some of that $$$ on the game.....which is a more legitimate way to grow?


i think its is fair(if not a little silly) to spend as much time on sgw raiding as you can...because every1 has the same amount of time to raid...but if people are buying hundreds of $$ worth of uu and naq where some people can afford it...i dont think thats fair.

Re: NO.1

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:34 pm
by Omega Blade
thats life mate.. it salways unfair

Re: NO.1

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 6:44 pm
by alex3
Omega Blade wrote:thats life mate.. it salways unfair


ill get over it

Re: NO.1

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:25 am
by RepliMagni
alex3 wrote:i think its is fair(if not a little silly) to spend as much time on sgw raiding as you can...because every1 has the same amount of time to raid...but if people are buying hundreds of $$ worth of uu and naq where some people can afford it...i dont think thats fair.


My point was that everyone does not have the same amount of time to raid. Imagine a father who has to hold down two jobs and look after his kids playing this game, compared to a 15yr old kid with nothing more to worry about than a bit of homework....clearly they do not have the same amount of time to raid....

Re: NO.1

Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2008 1:29 am
by bebita
magni mate the both ways are legitime in my view
everyone play the game w
how they can
some with raiding some buying some selling
thats why we love this game right?
are manny factors that keeps people play this game
i am sad to see how manny people yells that admin is not good and admin do that and must to change that
from what i know this game is the biggest in this area of games and is not because of some players or others
is because ADMIN