Page 2 of 2
Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (H-8 this week)
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 5:22 pm
by Demon Lord Razgriz
Well, if the H-8 is to be China's big new bomber, I would say it can carry most of their types of bombs; laser, GPS(or something like it), dumb, etc...
As for defending itself, its a stealthy flying wing so you can't have guns sticking out the side. It probablly has ECM built-in to it so most likely its like the B-2 in terms of defence.
Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (H-8 this week)
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 5:47 pm
by Solus
ok. lol its dogfighting capability would be minimal if not non existant

Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (H-8 this week)
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 6:35 pm
by Demon Lord Razgriz
.:SOULLESS:. wrote:ok. lol its dogfighting capability would be minimal if not non existant

It's a Bomber, not a Fighter. There has only been one big bomber that has been in a dogfight, a B-17 called 'Old 666' in WW2.
Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (H-8 this week)
Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 7:02 pm
by Solus
Demon Lord Razgriz wrote:.:SOULLESS:. wrote:ok. lol its dogfighting capability would be minimal if not non existant

It's a Bomber, not a Fighter. There has only been one big bomber that has been in a dogfight, a B-17 called 'Old 666' in WW2.
yeah...

but on this train of thought the F-117 comes to mind, its designated a fighter for some odd reason... i reckon it should be re designated the B-117... *laughs*
Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (H-8 this week)
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 9:49 am
by Demon Lord Razgriz
.:SOULLESS:. wrote:Demon Lord Razgriz wrote:.:SOULLESS:. wrote:ok. lol its dogfighting capability would be minimal if not non existant

It's a Bomber, not a Fighter. There has only been one big bomber that has been in a dogfight, a B-17 called 'Old 666' in WW2.
yeah...

but on this train of thought the F-117 comes to mind, its designated a fighter for some odd reason... i reckon it should be re designated the B-117... *laughs*
The F-117 was called that to misguide the soviets in what it really was. Also, when it was designated F-117, the USAF had already restarted the number sequense. It should be called A-11 or B-2; and the B-2, the B-3.
Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (H-8 this week)
Posted: Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:27 pm
by Solus
Demon Lord Razgriz wrote:.:SOULLESS:. wrote:Demon Lord Razgriz wrote:.:SOULLESS:. wrote:ok. lol its dogfighting capability would be minimal if not non existant

It's a Bomber, not a Fighter. There has only been one big bomber that has been in a dogfight, a B-17 called 'Old 666' in WW2.
yeah...

but on this train of thought the F-117 comes to mind, its designated a fighter for some odd reason... i reckon it should be re designated the B-117... *laughs*
The F-117 was called that to misguide the soviets in what it really was. Also, when it was designated F-117, the USAF had already restarted the number sequense. It should be called A-11 or B-2; and the B-2, the B-3.
haha yeah
ah well... a flawed designation system they will have to live with

or they could call it an A-117... *laughs*
Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (H-8 this week)
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 11:14 am
by Demon Lord Razgriz
Ok, the poll is tied at 3 for F-35 JSF & something else. You have until midnight tonight to say what you what to talk about. If nothing is said, we will talk about the runner-up, MOAB. You must put your answer in a reply.
Re: The 'Offical' Military Hardware Page (H-8) Closed
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 8:03 pm
by Demon Lord Razgriz
Ok, MOAB it is then.