=pCommunity making rules
-
Almost38
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4226
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 5:12 pm
- Alliance: I am in your base
- Race: killing your d00ds
- ID: 0
- Location: running chicago's underground
Re: Community making rules
no you didnt dont lie =p
=pzebism is the way of the furutre!
Spoiler
Rules of SGW
1.Mass
2.?????
3.PROFIT!
We Be Epic
1.Mass
2.?????
3.PROFIT!
We Be Epic
-
Iƒrit
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3507
- Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 9:15 am
- Alliance: The Legion
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 22479
- Alternate name(s): Hansel, Nighthawk
- Location: Maine
Re: Community making rules
lol, you can read minds?
-
Almost38
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 4226
- Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 5:12 pm
- Alliance: I am in your base
- Race: killing your d00ds
- ID: 0
- Location: running chicago's underground
Re: Community making rules
maybe;)
zebism is the way of the furutre!
Spoiler
Rules of SGW
1.Mass
2.?????
3.PROFIT!
We Be Epic
1.Mass
2.?????
3.PROFIT!
We Be Epic
-
Legendary Apophis
- Forum History
- Posts: 13681
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:54 pm
- Alliance: Generations
- Race: System Lord
- ID: 7889
- Alternate name(s): Apophis the Great
- Location: Ha'TaK
Re: Community making rules
Rules are fine 
Spoiler
Incarnate - LG - LG1 - LG2 - LG3 - LG4 - AG - EAG ~ AGoL - Completed
Spoiler
<Dmonix> Damnit Jim how come every conversation with you always ends up discussing something deep and meaningful?
<Dmonix> We always end up discussing male/female differences or politics or football
<Dmonix> All the really important issues in life
<Dmonix> We always end up discussing male/female differences or politics or football
<Dmonix> All the really important issues in life
-
Nuto vixen
- Forum Addict
- Posts: 3295
- Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 8:16 pm
- ID: 0
- Location: Australia
Re: Community making rules
I don't think they need to be redone completely, but I'd like to see the rule that states "you are not allowed to post on a banned users behalf", or you're completely defeating the purpose of the ban. Like we have seen with all the morons posting for others lately... they are only throwing fuel to the fire, specially if said person was banned for being a public nuisance and causing problems for the community. Letting others post on their behalf is their way of maintaining their opinions, comments and words.
Why ban anyone at all if they can just post "through" someone else?
Why ban anyone at all if they can just post "through" someone else?
It's not a matter of luck; it's just a matter of time.
-
Clarkey
- Multi Hunter
- Posts: 14366
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 4:23 am
- ID: 0
- Contact:
-
Honours and Awards
Re: Community making rules
Nuto vixen wrote:I don't think they need to be redone completely, but I'd like to see the rule that states "you are not allowed to post on a banned users behalf", or you're completely defeating the purpose of the ban. Like we have seen with all the morons posting for others lately... they are only throwing fuel to the fire, specially if said person was banned for being a public nuisance and causing problems for the community. Letting others post on their behalf is their way of maintaining their opinions, comments and words.
Why ban anyone at all if they can just post "through" someone else?
I agree with this. What is the point of banning users for a particular reason when other users can then just post on their behalf?
