StarGateWars Forums

The breath before the plunge ay...

I dont farm, but when I do, I just farm anyone I want. I dont have an alliance to worry about, and my partner in crime these days dosent really give a dam who we fight.

If you werent fuall, done correctly you could farm with a medium strike more than they would ever destroy, high levels and a bit of savvy and it'd probably be the quickest way to grow, loads of high incomes and relatively low defences, i dare you to try it

Don Lewis wrote:If you werent fuall, done correctly you could farm with a medium strike more than they would ever destroy, high levels and a bit of savvy and it'd probably be the quickest way to grow, loads of high incomes and relatively low defences, i dare you to try it

Then OMEGA sits on your account it would not be worth it,

ahhh good old days ..... where have all the farms gone... .long long time ago

You farmed them all blahh, there are no more players to farm

Balhaar wrote:Thats exactly the problem wih the game..well no, the problem with the people who play it.

Thats why TSA only has one NAP and thats with the Collective and only really due to the fact that me and Odin are mates ingame ooh and i suppose myself and tweety have a mutual no hit thing.

You know its because u really fear me

~Odin~ wrote:

Balhaar wrote:Thats exactly the problem wih the game..well no, the problem with the people who play it.

Thats why TSA only has one NAP and thats with the Collective and only really due to the fact that me and Odin are mates ingame ooh and i suppose myself and tweety have a mutual no hit thing.

You know its because u really fear me

You sure its not pity

Richard_Destroyer wrote:

Don Lewis wrote:If you werent fuall, done correctly you could farm with a medium strike more than they would ever destroy, high levels and a bit of savvy and it'd probably be the quickest way to grow, loads of high incomes and relatively low defences, i dare you to try it

Then OMEGA sits on your account it would not be worth it,

There is a risk to reward ratio that each player decides on for how they play the game.

Many decide to take minimal risks, very few decide to take the harder option and take the great risks.

For a long time I used to attack the GA/Omega/Alpha/TSA/EPA/UTA etc etc and after a while they would pay my account a visit to put me back in my place. This escalated into war a few times which was great fun for all concerned.

I knew the risks, sometimes I would decide not to take the naq, sometimes I did. I weighed up the situation and what i thought i could get away with and who I could push a little further than others.

I also made sure I always played a minimalist style of game where at any time I didnt have much that could be destroyed if i did push the wrong person a little too far

During these attacks I also used diplomacy against those I attacked. To some I portrayed myself as weak and not worth the trouble so they would leave me alone, to some I portrayed myself as someone who would take that players account to the grave if they wanted to destroy me so they left me alone too. I loved trying to analyze how I should email these players, trying to read the player behind the email and how they would react to different styles of replies.

Luckily I got it right most of the time and so didnt suffer too much

Anyways, I have rambled too much

Mango wrote:
There is a risk to reward ratio that each player decides on for how they play the game.

Many decide to take minimal risks, very few decide to take the harder option and take the great risks.

For a long time I used to attack the GA/Omega/Alpha/TSA/EPA/UTA etc etc and after a while they would pay my account a visit to put me back in my place. This escalated into war a few times which was great fun for all concerned.

I knew the risks, sometimes I would decide not to take the naq, sometimes I did. I weighed up the situation and what i thought i could get away with and who I could push a little further than others.

I also made sure I always played a minimalist style of game where at any time I didnt have much that could be destroyed if i did push the wrong person a little too far

During these attacks I also used diplomacy against those I attacked. To some I portrayed myself as weak and not worth the trouble so they would leave me alone, to some I portrayed myself as someone who would take that players account to the grave if they wanted to destroy me so they left me alone too. I loved trying to analyze how I should email these players, trying to read the player behind the email and how they would react to different styles of replies.

Luckily I got it right most of the time and so didnt suffer too much

Anyways, I have rambled too much

Spoken from a true player of the game.

Avitir wrote:

~Odin~ wrote:

Balhaar wrote:Thats exactly the problem wih the game..well no, the problem with the people who play it.

Thats why TSA only has one NAP and thats with the Collective and only really due to the fact that me and Odin are mates ingame ooh and i suppose myself and tweety have a mutual no hit thing.

You know its because u really fear me

You sure its not pity

The only hting im sure he pity's just like me....would be teachers