Page 2 of 7

Re: unfair ? why dont you dicide

Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:21 am
by pianomutt20000
personally, i think the shear number of weps that people buy should dictate an increase in the cost. add a few more weps. One that costs 1 bil a wep or so.

Re: unfair ? why dont you dicide

Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:21 am
by RobinInDaHood
SVaRuN wrote:I quote the PM:

Message text:

Hahaha send me 5 mln uu or I deascended you.


Blue


*cough*, yeah, um, sorry about that. I was having a bad morning. ;) :lol:

Re: unfair ? why dont you dicide

Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:22 am
by Legendary Apophis
Hmmm no pergatory people should still be able to play ascended, no main account ones not be able, but pergatory, yes!

Re: unfair ? why dont you dicide

Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:23 am
by Borek
no they can't Draleg, they have to have 1/5th your planet total before they are ALLOWED to attack you, that's what was being referred to. New players can't attack anyone except other new players, even though there's tons of inactives who leave out more than enough DMU to help these players out.

Yes established players can snipe if they want to, but Nightmare was referring to the truely new players, they can't farm people until they get their planet total up and it's hard to get your planet total up when you have no income to speak of and hardly anyone in the game you are allowed to farm due to what must easily be classed as the most retarded rule ever, the 5:1 joke.

And i agree Bill, we need a bunch of extra, and more expensive, weapons added at the bare minimum, as it stands i can replace my entire defense weapons with 1/10th of my per turn income, lol.

Re: unfair ? why dont you dicide

Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:28 am
by Legendary Apophis
Now I feel that doing "big ascensions" has been a waste of time for me, since I only had time to make one, as update came before I do the second one. So I'm only messiah now while many are Ancient Gods...I would have prefered this to be announced in advance...but well, that's like that.

Re: unfair ? why dont you dicide

Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:30 am
by Brdavs
I say reset ascended lol. The inflation resulted in it being FUBAR.... not a product of the last updates but the very conception. What did you expect but problems with UPs into 100s of millions... everything but stable longevity was assured.

And you cant really just cut a couple of zeroes across the board to make things like CER, planets and DMU actually meaningfull since some of us are 5bil planets infront. If you cut it cap style at the top you have what you have here today.
I`m sorry to say this since I`ve done well for myself up there but short of a clean slate youre either gonna have what we have today with "overprotected" small/medium guys or what we had a year ago: "exclusive gentlemens "we dont know you you dont play" club"...

Re: unfair ? why dont you dicide

Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:31 am
by pianomutt20000
This is why I never, ever played the ascended server. It just seemed way too restricted, and I didn't like the rules.


Bill

Re: unfair ? why dont you dicide

Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:31 am
by Borek
Brdavs wrote:I say reset ascended lol. The inflation resulted in it being FUBAR.... not a product of the last updates but the very conception. What did you expect but problems with UPs into 100s of millions... everything but stable longevity was assured.

And you cant really just cut a couple of zeroes across the board to make things like CER, planets and DMU actually meaningfull since some of us are 5bil planets infront. If you cut it cap style at the top you have what you have here today.
I`m sorry to say this since I`ve done well for myself up there but short of a clean slate youre either gonna have what we have today with "overprotected" small/medium guys or what we had a year ago: "exclusive genlemens "we dont know you you dont play" club"...
Yeah, reset would be good, but only if the game was fixed first otherwise we'd just be back to square one in 6 months time, lol.

Re: unfair ? why dont you dicide

Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:33 am
by Mato
:)

@mutt: but I guess you miss your rank 1 strike :)

Re: unfair ? why dont you dicide

Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:36 am
by bebita
ascend is crap
nbo worth to play
log in to not be dezascended the only important thing
the rest is crap

Re: unfair ? why dont you dicide

Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 4:40 am
by pianomutt20000
Mato wrote::)

@mutt: but I guess you miss your rank 1 strike :)




Yep. But not the politics, it's gotten stupid lol.

Yeah, i'd say that a game reset, both ascended and main would be awesome. It'd remove the hold some of the older players have. And those insane army sizes.

Re: unfair ? why dont you dicide

Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 5:22 am
by Legendary Apophis
pianomutt20000 wrote:
Mato wrote::)

@mutt: but I guess you miss your rank 1 strike :)




Yep. But not the politics, it's gotten stupid lol.

Yeah, i'd say that a game reset, both ascended and main would be awesome. It'd remove the hold some of the older players have. And those insane army sizes.

People invested money in it...
I am TOTALLY against a main server reset!

viewtopic.php?p=1353484#p1353484

Talking of a solution there, we do.

Re: unfair ? why dont you dicide

Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 5:25 am
by pianomutt20000
I foresee a problem in the future, when so many are too high that nobody plays. A game reset to more reasonable levels, might help. Not to mention that raiding has increased the rate at which people can aquire insane amounts of uu..



I figure, one day, it will be reset or shut down. Only a matter of time.

Re: unfair ? why dont you dicide

Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 5:27 am
by Legendary Apophis
pianomutt20000 wrote:I foresee a problem in the future, when so many are too high that nobody plays. A game reset to more reasonable levels, might help. Not to mention that raiding has increased the rate at which people can aquire insane amounts of uu..



I figure, one day, it will be reset or shut down. Only a matter of time.

As I said countless time...STOP GROWING THE DAMN LIMIT OF RAIDING UU UP (@whoever decided it), and all will be fine.
I say, limit of trade=limit of raid.
It solves all, not everyone is 24/7 player, afterall!
And THAT, will solve MANY MANY ATs rates problems!!
All big player not caring of raiding, more raids available for smaller players, they grow quicker, and everything is fine, as the army cap is quite how now. Big players dont have same problem of slowed growth or anything, and smaller can grow better.
It's not that hard to solve problems, just have to find out.
And I said it many time already <_<

Re: unfair ? why dont you dicide

Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 5:43 am
by chargin
I had 300mil CER. If you think it is hard to play ascension in a big alliance u have no idea how hard it is to play out of one. Not only do u have the occasional twit attacking you, you have people in large alliances that farm your stronger account and expect not to be hit or even farmed back. If you got into the top 20 with that CER you only got there because of people that were ahead of you got knocked out, I was one of them. :lol: