StarGateWars Forums

zeekomkommer wrote:

renegadze wrote:I had more but logs only go back that far. but it's ok I've never really trusted that Fuall will keep to a NAP

Delta

May 12, 2008 Galadriel Attack 52,294,981,224,318 Dark Matter Units lost 15 62700 75289 196,337,402,080,840



May 11, 2008 Oumar Attack 81,789,658,364,827 Dark Matter Units lost 15 55500 76817 211,329,202,456,890



May 11, 2008 Joselito Attack 59,765,698,862,532 Dark Matter Units lost 15 75273 78377 243,558,405,787,400



May 10, 2008 Oumar Attack 46,617,843,518,730 Dark Matter Units lost 15 66080 80776 303,503,470,484,280

contact either god shornaal or gunZ about this, they are heads of diplomatic afairs and delta HC, they should make sure that if the nap was there it all gets repayed in DMU or NAQ

if you fail to do so get in contact with me and i'll make sure you get repayed


zeek

You also need to consider that the FUALL/TJP NAP started May 11th 19:00 game time, so there is only a single possible NAP breach on May 12th. I am sure Delta will compensate you for your losses if you have the courtesy to inform them.

well, if he catches me up on MSN i'll send him those 52tril DMU back that galadriel stole, not a big deal ....

and for the info:
doc holliday and lithium have my MSN addy


there is always a difference between:
ppl braking naps and refusing to pay back
ppl braking naps and never being contacted about it or repayment ever asked

most nap breaches happen unaware on ascended and ppl only notice when they get a PM about it

i tell u what u can shove ur UU losses where the sun doesnt shine

i said in the previous thread that i would pay the uu losses back and to contact me but u havent done that i was on msn nearly all day yesterday that is not my fault u didnt contact me.

u can threaten TO all u want i dont care u saw how that ended this time

i have contacted many of FUALL leaders in the past for breakings of naps as some have said most of the time u take repair naq outta the equation never mind paying back any uu lost. actually in all my time in getting repayments back from u guys UU losses have never been apart of it

the nxt move is urs i have offered to pay which u have ignored by re-opening this stating wat Grim said a while ago so if u plan to attack TO for naq i so dare u

why didn't you just broker him the UU memento instead of asking him to contact you? he clearly says how much he thinks he's owed in the other thread as well as this one, he's already waited ages for a response, you asking him to jump through yet more hoops is really rather pointless.

Either you're going to pay up or not, you can find his ID easily enough, so why not just pay up now and close this entire matter instead of dragging it out even more?

@ Deni

You and I both know how long I was without alliance, yes I moved from TO to TA. I was without alliance for so short a period of time I simply changed ascension tags from TO to TA. So even in the brief interval where I changed I still had nap'd tags, unless you are telling me all Fuall GQ and check main before a single attack on ascension.


@ zeek

thanks for the offer, it's no worries. I actually don't want anything back

my point of posting was that Nap breaches happen fairly often. We just all don't moan about them

renegadze wrote:@ Deni

You and I both know how long I was without alliance, yes I moved from TO to TA. I was without alliance for so short a period of time I simply changed ascension tags from TO to TA. So even in the brief interval where I changed I still had nap'd tags, unless you are telling me all Fuall GQ and check main before a single attack on ascension.


@ zeek

thanks for the offer, it's no worries. I actually don't want anything back

my point of posting was that Nap breaches happen fairly often. We just all don't moan about them

Tags or no tags on ascension, you were not part of an alliance that we had a NAP with at the time of the hits. So please do not post them as evidence how often the NAP gets broken. I am still willing to repay whatever you lost in that attacks though.

You are right, NAP breaches happen and usually they get sorted pretty fast using the appropriate channels. Unfortunately sometimes one side refuses to admit an obvious NAP breach or worse, admits it but refuses to repay damages.

I do hope that Memento's post was his own personal opinion and not TO's official stance on the matter.

Borek wrote:why didn't you just broker him the UU memento instead of asking him to contact you? he clearly says how much he thinks he's owed in the other thread as well as this one, he's already waited ages for a response, you asking him to jump through yet more hoops is really rather pointless.

Either you're going to pay up or not, you can find his ID easily enough, so why not just pay up now and close this entire matter instead of dragging it out even more?

MFC could have done the same aswell or is it only one way

and deni take it from the stance of who u want

Well to be fair to MFC when he spoke to the guilty party he was told quite explicitly that he wasn't getting his UU back, so he couldn't very well broker him. if you mean he could broker you then yes he could, but the bottom line is you DID say you would pay him yourself, personally i would take that to mean YOU will broker HIM.

I still say the same thing though, if you want this matter closed just set up a Broker, job done.

Memento wrote:

Borek wrote:why didn't you just broker him the UU memento instead of asking him to contact you? he clearly says how much he thinks he's owed in the other thread as well as this one, he's already waited ages for a response, you asking him to jump through yet more hoops is really rather pointless.

Either you're going to pay up or not, you can find his ID easily enough, so why not just pay up now and close this entire matter instead of dragging it out even more?

MFC could have done the same aswell or is it only one way

and deni take it from the stance of who u want

Thank you for the clarification. It's good to know that TO sees the NAP we thought we have in place as non-existant.


As Borek said, the issue could have been solved already if TO had shown a bit of respect to the alliances they have a NAP with. Unfortunately I do not see any.

deni wrote:

Memento wrote:

Borek wrote:why didn't you just broker him the UU memento instead of asking him to contact you? he clearly says how much he thinks he's owed in the other thread as well as this one, he's already waited ages for a response, you asking him to jump through yet more hoops is really rather pointless.

Either you're going to pay up or not, you can find his ID easily enough, so why not just pay up now and close this entire matter instead of dragging it out even more?

MFC could have done the same aswell or is it only one way

and deni take it from the stance of who u want

Thank you for the clarification. It's good to know that TO sees the NAP we thought we have in place as non-existant.


As Borek said, the issue could have been solved already if TO had shown a bit of respect to the alliances they have a NAP with. Unfortunately I do not see any.

no respect at all hey then we want the 1trill naq we sent back

and yes my comments lead u to believe we see the nap as non-existant i totally said that, i mean damn u must have read so much into wat i put getting out some mashed up thing saying we dont see a nap as existing

this is wat im going to do, i will wait for a broker to come in from MFC i wont set one myself, u can say im not showing u respect, but to that point i dont really respect ur alliance name at all for all that has happened in this game with TO or other alliances.

either set a trade or go else where

TO has always been and will always be an alliance of peace and not of war but we wont be walked over

Surely I must have misinterpreted your statements.

Correct me if I am wrong, but aren't you the one talking about war now? Or stating on the forums you have no respect for us? Or telling us to "show our uu where the sun does not shine"? Or breaking the NAP refusing the repay damages?

Anyways, MFC will not set a broker himself. In fact, he won't demand any compensation for the losses his took from the NAP breach. It's not about a few men lost or not, it is about the principle. And in my eyes TO proved already that they do not and will not honour their agreements nor show a bit of respect towards NAP'ed alliances.

well i said i f u want the UU back ur gonna be the ones to set a trade

I read just MFC post, the rest is not relevand,

no UU repazments is neede, or we should ask all UU looses wich was done bz FUALL during NAP.

i can start with nigatsu, long storz about DMU hits, zes, he told me he will repaz so, DDE HC send me email where i can sent all screens 9i have it all since comador asked me for it0

than" IM asking repazments from slayer from alpha allaince, who was massing our member during non massing agreement, he owe naquadah as well, he broke NAP few times and ditn repay all.

than there are many other hits on main and ascended server, many massings, many assasinations, MANY...


MFC, ask your UUs from those FUALL members who owe UUs to us.

Trade Maker Trade Partner Goods Traded In Exchange For Time Status Notes
~MassinForChrist~ Memento 1 Naquadah 260,000 Untrained 05:37 Completed.

there u go

now u can leave us alone

no memento, he has his UU, now we want ur UU and our naq.

i can satrt with ascended hits against us during NAP. where can i send logs and screen shots?