Page 2 of 3
Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 9:20 pm
by mikgamer1
You said things that are known to everyone and just added a few "pfft's" in there and your name in a different color to the end of your post...
Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 2:41 am
by Mercury Rising
Mikgamer/For The Lulz [Duh] wrote:You said things that are known to everyone and just added a few "pfft's" in there and your name in a different color to the end of your post...
lol with 6 brain cells I'm surprised you don't see in black-and-white. Known to everyone? But not mentioned on forum? Relevance?.....High....
~.^~Mercury.
Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 3:13 am
by mikgamer1
Lulz! I gained 4 brain cells by saying lulz.
Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 3:16 am
by Kikaz
Mercury Rising wrote:Mikgamer/For The Lulz [Duh] wrote:You said things that are known to everyone and just added a few "pfft's" in there and your name in a different color to the end of your post...
lol with 6 brain cells I'm surprised you don't see in black-and-white. Known to everyone? But not mentioned on forum? Relevance?.....High....
~.^~Mercury.
Nice guess but For The Lulz [Duh] isnt Mikgamer...
Mikgamer is just "Lulz".
Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 3:21 am
by mikgamer1
lulz
Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 3:37 am
by Mercury Rising
I shall believe what i like
~Mercury.
Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 3:52 am
by Kikaz
Mercury Rising wrote:I shall believe what i like
~Mercury.
Ok, but instead of making stupid accusations have some actual proof...
For The Lulz [Duh] is id=19228
http://quantumgate.stargatewars.com/legendsDetail.php?id=19228Lulz is id=19835
http://quantumgate.stargatewars.com/legendsDetail.php?id=19835Therefore it is quite clear who Mikgamer actually is...
Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:29 am
by Mercury Rising
you call that proof?
~Mercury.
Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:33 am
by Sephiroth
that is only proof you both have survived eras but never won.
Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:35 am
by mikgamer1
I don't play to win, I just do it for the lulz!
Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:35 am
by Kikaz
Mercury Rising wrote:you call that proof?
~Mercury.
Did you actually click on links?
Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 6:57 am
by Sephiroth
just an excuse for not being able to win
Mikgamer wrote:I don't play to win, I just do it for the lulz!
I did it wasnt very impressive
Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:00 am
by mikgamer1
Sephiroth wrote:just an excuse for not being able to win
Mikgamer wrote:I don't play to win, I just do it for the lulz!
I did it wasnt very impressive
lulz @ anyone thinking I tried being #1 than anything other than most mercenarys my second wave playing ;]
Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:01 am
by Kikaz
The only wave he even played half of the wave actively he finished 14...
Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers
Posted: Fri Jun 27, 2008 7:01 am
by Sephiroth
lol what?
