Page 2 of 4
Re: Issues with Jack
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:01 am
by Severian
Jack wrote:Severian wrote:http://herebegames.com/StarGateWarsNew/viewtopic.php?f=132&t=117720
Mods will need to contact me via pm, and not post in any thread in this section. This is mainly due to the request of several players, who made their case. They prefer the mods deal with me in a private manner over pm. This however will be waved if the party making the complaint so decides.
Way to follow the rules Jack.
I never saw that post, but way to tucktail and run.
Severian wrote:Yet more examples of your complete and utter ineptness.
Oh what's that, an insult? Isn't that exactly why you're complaining about me? I see how it is, hypocrisy FTW!
EDIT:
TheRook wrote:@ Jack why dont you take this like a serious issue instead of trying to make jokes out of everything as that just makes it look like you could careless about peoples opinions.
Because Rook, I
don't care about your opinion! That's right, you're not the center of my universe! Now run and cry to your mommy!

So now you ARE aware of the Rule AND still CHOSE to break it.
This is what we are complaining about. We have an issue and that is we believe you are not fit for the job and presented our case along with examples and you have given us some more case stuides. You are a moderator, we are not. Our issue is that your attitude and actions directly conflict with the requirements for the position(s) you were given.
Still abusive, still breaking rules, still agressive and still attacking anyone who presents critisism against you despite the fact this very section was created as an enviroment free of mods in which posters can present their case(s).
Re: Issues with Jack
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:04 am
by TheRook
Jack wrote:EDIT:
TheRook wrote:@ Jack why dont you take this like a serious issue instead of trying to make jokes out of everything as that just makes it look like you could careless about peoples opinions.
Because Rook, I
don't care about your opinion! That's right, you're not the center of my universe! Now run and cry to your mommy!

This is exactly what your like in every thread... you have a severe lack of immaturity and no respect towards other forum users/mods which you should have if your to represent/do the best for the community as people look at your actions and judge the entire mod team based on what they see from your posts.
I would also like to raise an issue as you are mocking me and trying to insulting my intelligence.
So I will be creating another thread in here shortly.
TheRook
Re: Issues with Jack
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:05 am
by Severian
Jack wrote:You're addressing me directly, if you don't want me replying to you then don't address me directly.

I said specifically in the post(s) above you did not have permission. You are knowingly breaking rules in an attempt to spite us for lodging complaints against you.
Re: Issues with Jack
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:07 am
by mikgamer1
Jack sounds like he should go to and stay a "mod", or whatever they call them there, of IRC...
Re: Issues with Jack
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:20 am
by Juliette

@ allowing public accusations, but denying the right for public defence.
Someone forgot the basic principle of equality for the law and made it into a playground for kids with grudges to be vented to the public.. *looks up* Yo.. there goes the validity of the section. Damn shame.
If I shout across the Marketplace that you're a witch, and then have the Sheriff tell you you cannot shout on the Marketplace that you are not.. am I not condemning you to the whims of whatever fool believes he holds a substantial accusation? Beh. Pointlessness reigns.
Re: Issues with Jack
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:22 am
by sweet revenge
Jack wrote:Jack wrote:You're addressing me directly, if you don't want me replying to you then don't address me directly.

But don't worry, someone politely asked me to buzz off on MSN, so I buzz off now.
Toodles.
You couldn't even if you tried.
Re: Issues with Jack
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:28 am
by mikgamer1
sweet revenge wrote:Jack wrote:Jack wrote:You're addressing me directly, if you don't want me replying to you then don't address me directly.

But don't worry, someone politely asked me to buzz off on MSN, so I buzz off now.
Toodles.
You couldn't even if you tried.
See guy? It's that simple. If a mod is bugging you, or atleast Jack, all you need to do is ask them "please leave me alone" or nicely ask them to "buzz off" and they will leave you alone!
Re: Issues with Jack
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 1:32 am
by sweet revenge
You think if Sev said to Jack "please buzz off", that Jack would under these circumstances? No I don't think so.
Re: Issues with Jack
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 2:34 am
by Solus
your all lunatics. sorry, but you are.
@sev: if you didnt want the argument in the public, WHY POST HERE? you reek of hypocricy. also you complain about rule breaking KNOWINGLY? Jack himself admitted he was unaware. take the time and READ his posts before you complain about them in the form of some inane dribble.
Severian wrote:Jack wrote:You're addressing me directly, if you don't want me replying to you then don't address me directly.

I said specifically in the post(s) above you did not have permission. You are knowingly breaking rules in an attempt to spite us for lodging complaints against you.
then dont lodge the complaints publicly, less you want a public rebuttle.
@sweet revenge: notice jack hasnt replied anymore? duh?
Re: Issues with Jack
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 2:40 am
by weilandsmith
c'mon peeps. Jack has already posted a reconciliation thread. don't add more fuel to the fire. for the sake of fun and the game, lets just keep silent now.
Re: Issues with Jack
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 2:48 am
by Nuto vixen
Rev. Auriel Daniels wrote: Beh. Pointlessness reigns.
You're THE most perfect example of that sentiment. What a hoot!
Perhaps you should stop kissing some behinds and let the people of the community speak out without having to be subjected to your posts for a change.
No amount of defending this guy will change anyone's mind of him. If anything, you're making it worse.
Re: Issues with Jack
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 2:50 am
by TheRook
Nuto vixen wrote:Rev. Auriel Daniels wrote: Beh. Pointlessness reigns.
You're THE most perfect example of that sentiment. What a hoot!
Perhaps you should stop kissing some behinds and let the people of the community speak out without having to be subjected to your posts for a change.
No amount of defending this guy will change anyone's mind of him. If anything, you're making it worse.
This isn't the thread for it but Auriels constant posting in threads spamming an image is also an issue...
Re: Issues with Jack
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:06 am
by Juliette
Nuto vixen wrote:Rev. Auriel Daniels wrote: Beh. Pointlessness reigns.
You're THE most perfect example of that sentiment. What a hoot!
Oh, golly.. I actually said that?

What a fail for me..
Nuto vixen wrote:Perhaps you should stop kissing some behinds and let the people of the community speak out without having to be subjected to your posts for a change.
Awws.. so cute when you're upset. Now where were we again.. oh yes, we were trying to flame people without risking other people talking back. Gee, I wonder why that didn't work out.
Nuto vixen wrote:No amount of defending this guy will change anyone's mind of him. If anything, you're making it worse.
Tell me about it.. been there, done that. Funny thing is, it does make a difference for some people. Positive, or negative.. it does.

TheRook wrote:This isn't the thread for it but Auriels constant posting in threads spamming an image is also an issue...
Statistically, you have no feet to stand on.

Massive majority of my posts still is without pic.

But please, let's make a new thread about me, shall we? Oh, drat.. now you can claim I'm an attention thingy again.

Could you please inform me when I should start taking you serious again? My guess is that's around the same time you will have found your point again.

Good luck searching.
ps. I hope I was not more offensive than usual.. some people think saying "the" is an offense..
pps. See? No pics.
Re: Issues with Jack
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 am
by dastupy
Rev. Auriel Daniels wrote:Nuto vixen wrote:Rev. Auriel Daniels wrote: Beh. Pointlessness reigns.
You're THE most perfect example of that sentiment. What a hoot!
Oh, golly.. I actually said that?

What a fail for me..
Nuto vixen wrote:Perhaps you should stop kissing some behinds and let the people of the community speak out without having to be subjected to your posts for a change.
Awws.. so cute when you're upset. Now where were we again.. oh yes, we were trying to flame people without risking other people talking back. Gee, I wonder why that didn't work out.
Nuto vixen wrote:No amount of defending this guy will change anyone's mind of him. If anything, you're making it worse.
Tell me about it.. been there, done that. Funny thing is, it does make a difference for some people. Positive, or negative.. it does.

TheRook wrote:This isn't the thread for it but Auriels constant posting in threads spamming an image is also an issue...
Statistically, you have no feet to stand on.

Massive majority of my posts still is without pic.

But please, let's make a new thread about me, shall we? Oh, drat.. now you can claim I'm an attention thingy again.

Could you please inform me when I should start taking you serious again? My guess is that's around the same time you will have found your point again.

Good luck searching.
ps. I hope I was not more offensive than usual.. some people think saying "the" is an offense..
pps. See? No pics.
I'm sorry to say this Auriel , but since you became a mod most of your posts are spam...
Has it anything to do with the power you received? Maybe
Has it anything to do with all your post? Maybe
P.S.: much love , dastupy

Re: Issues with Jack
Posted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:13 am
by pianomutt20000
This was a thread about Jack. Please keep it on topic. If you would like to complain about another mod, that's another thread. I am amending the rules to allow mods to defend themselves, but only the mod who is and feels insulted. This will prevent clutter from forming.
Bill