Page 2 of 4

Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers (Wave 16)

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 8:53 pm
by Kikaz
Amar wrote:w/e floats ur boat. even if u finish first i know its not legitimate. have fun

Interesting, so spending cash on one wave over 2 years ago makes me an illegitmate player?

Wow, more then half of Quantum are illegitmate players according to your definition.


That was back when 100k main UU sold for $50... I had around 5m army back then and sold it for cash.

Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers (Wave 16)

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:11 pm
by mikgamer1
Last I checked this is about Owned. Vs. DoC war, go cry where someone cares Amar.

Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers (Wave 16)

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 9:24 pm
by knight
Mikgamer wrote:Last I checked this is about Owned. Vs. DoC war, go cry where someone cares Amar.


He was in DoC, he must have quit before he got massed. :lol:

Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers (Wave 16)

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:14 pm
by Amar
Nope. I've rebuilt and left because I don't want to participate in a war started by a player with aa grudge.

And I'm not whining. Just had a very nice chat with Kikaz. I never said he was a poor player, I just have a different view on money and this game is all.


I do have to cheer for Doc, simply because I always cheer for the underdog.

Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers (Wave 16)

Posted: Wed Aug 27, 2008 10:25 pm
by Kikaz
Amar wrote:Nope. I've rebuilt and left because I don't want to participate in a war started by a player with aa grudge.

And I'm not whining. Just had a very nice chat with Kikaz. I never said he was a poor player, I just have a different view on money and this game is all.


I do have to cheer for Doc, simply because I always cheer for the underdog.

But but were out numbered more then 2 to 1 :(

There rank 1 and were rank 4 :(

They have 16 members in top 100 and we only have 16 members!! :(

/end sarcasm.

Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers (Wave 16)

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:12 am
by Zeratul
from message we received, it was DoC that apparently decleared war, not owned.

noone has massed us yet... not even hurt our 5 weapons... (got to love the undead unique tech...)

Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers (Wave 16)

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:41 am
by Winter Wolf
It hasn't been much of a war, and wasn't really initiated at a smart time either.

Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers (Wave 16)

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 3:25 am
by torak
Didn't Owned declare war officially that is. Not sure Zeratul if they mean we declared war by massing Kikaz or we actually declared war.

Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers (Wave 16)

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:01 am
by Rn5ho
Winter Wolf wrote:It hasn't been much of a war, and wasn't really initiated at a smart time either.


i agree.

Also i can't see it all out war between 2 alliance if kikaz has so many enemies and few ppl decided to mass him right away. It's his own mistake to make so many enemies, why would entire Owned have to suffer then?

don't get me wrong, i support wars and like them, but this early in era it's just bad for both sides, and reason for this are interests of few ppl who "hate"/don't like eachother - keep it between yourselves.

Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers (Wave 16)

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:08 am
by mikgamer1
It wasn't just Kikaz who got massed out of spite, everyone (Hippy and Dan I believe were the only others) was hit for a reason. FEARLESS is just a sad vengance ridden little kid who can't let things go and let last waves actions live in last wave. This was about as sad as kids who suck at one server taking it thier anger out on the same player in another server, or worse yet getting someone else to mass for them.

Just another of the many sad actions FEARLESS has to add to his ever growing list of cowardly things he has done while playing SGW.

Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers (Wave 16)

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:26 am
by FEARLESS
:shock: Funny, I didn't mass because of vengence but a more
of a strategic plan to stop them from having too much power... :?
Also, Soonner or later either we mass them or they mass us.

Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers (Wave 16)

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:32 am
by Kikaz
FEARLESS wrote::shock: Funny, I didn't mass because of vengence but a more
of a strategic plan to stop them from having too much power... :?
Also, Soonner or later either we mass them or they mass us.

Actually you just ruined the wave for yourself, we dont war the same people we did the previous wave out of honor.. :?


Also by Owned. policy any alliance, that masses any member of Owned. gets instant war declared on it.

So yes, you did initiate the war.

Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers (Wave 16)

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 12:25 pm
by EnVy!
and the wars are going again lol. good luck to both sides.

p.s. i wanted to say that sabbing early was a strong move though FEARLESS and i can appreciate that. anyhow gl

Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers (Wave 16)

Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:37 pm
by mikgamer1
Well the market just gave every one against DoC in this war 10k free turns...have fun.

Re: Owned. vs. Dawn of Conquerers (Wave 16)

Posted: Fri Aug 29, 2008 10:15 pm
by Kikaz
Tonights massings on DoC:
Defensive Action 340,666,560 - MASSED
Defensive Action 225,041,294 - MASSED
Defensive Action 19,266,000 - MASSED
Defensive Action 46,157,600 - MASSED

20 supers 1,440,000,000 in weapons for the first one..
170 seconds 680,000,000 in weapons for the 2nd one...
19 seconds 76,000,000 in weapons for the 3rd one...
60 seconds and 90 3rds 334,320,000 in weapons for the 4th one...

2,530,320,000 NAQ just blown up from Four guys in your alliance.

Would have been way simpiler for you and your alliance to just repay me my 800m FEARLESS...


Now the rest of them are losing their Defenses.


Enjoy your waves gentlemen and greetings from,

Owned.