Page 2 of 3
Re: Lowest quality page 1 I recall seeing.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:11 pm
by RepliMagni
Lowest "quality"?
Maybe least known page 1 in quite some time, but I wouldn't write off someone's "quality" until I got to know them - just because you have a big name, doesn't make you worthy
Re: Lowest quality page 1 I recall seeing.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:29 pm
by Tekki
It is a bit insulting to call the current page 1 'low quality'. They have teh stats that are good enough for the time so they are page 1. Does that mean they are lessor than those who've been there in the past, nope, just means for the moment they have the stats.
And I love people who say people are 'stat builders'. You are meant to built stats to gain rank, protect naq, and go to war.
Re: Lowest quality page 1 I recall seeing.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 12:59 pm
by LTC
Im a stat builder!
Im building the number of days my account has existed!
Re: Lowest quality page 1 I recall seeing.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:48 pm
by Flavar
when a friend tells me to leave some ranks because some fun ist going to occur i drop down.
and i really dont know if my inactivity counts as quality^^
Re: Lowest quality page 1 I recall seeing.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 2:20 pm
by ramen07
Tacet wrote:ATM there are at least 5 accounts less than 60 mil, including a 43 mil Prophet.
and then theres the #6 Prior
add that to the fact that i can see half of page one's stats with 2trill covert...
Re: Lowest quality page 1 I recall seeing.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 2:43 pm
by Amar
I wouldn't say lower quality, but some stupid accounts. Just finished AC'ing rank 21. Ended up having about 17million total when I was done. Roughly a 25million account on page 1? Pfshh
Re: Lowest quality page 1 I recall seeing.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 4:09 pm
by Sex Panther
ramen07 wrote:Tacet wrote:ATM there are at least 5 accounts less than 60 mil, including a 43 mil Prophet.
and then theres the #6 Prior
add that to the fact that i can see half of page one's stats with 2trill covert...
Also someone mentioned the fact that he hadn't heard of 90% of the ppl.
Not to mention the usual "scarey" suspects,
aka players who I always see rise back to the top after a big war and I can never see there army like I can do now on page 1.
Plus It the player in the big war who rise to page one which is scarey cos I know they like to mass + they now have mad stats.
And im not saying hellfire and valley havent been in page 1 a lot but in general as I said. Not a very scarey page 1.
Low quality just implied that the best players are at war. Harsh...
Re: Lowest quality page 1 I recall seeing.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 4:25 pm
by Lore
Like whats already been said, they are there, why take anything from them?
Only thing that really bother me was seeing rank 3 in purg, How much longer till rank 1 is a purg account that can't be touched?
Sad really, but oh well. Jason seems to think having rank 1 and G&R obtainable from purg is a good thing,,,,,,IDK.
Re: Lowest quality page 1 I recall seeing.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 4:39 pm
by ~squishie~
Lore wrote:Like whats already been said, they are there, why take anything from them?
Only thing that really bother me was seeing rank 3 in purg, How much longer till rank 1 is a purg account that can't be touched?
Sad really, but oh well. Jason seems to think having rank 1 and G&R obtainable from purg is a good thing,,,,,,IDK.
rank 2 was in perg the other day, i thought that was crazy...
Re: Lowest quality page 1 I recall seeing.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 4:47 pm
by Lore
supersquish wrote:Lore wrote:Like whats already been said, they are there, why take anything from them?
Only thing that really bother me was seeing rank 3 in purg, How much longer till rank 1 is a purg account that can't be touched?
Sad really, but oh well. Jason seems to think having rank 1 and G&R obtainable from purg is a good thing,,,,,,IDK.
rank 2 was in perg the other day, i thought that was crazy...
Its sad, really sad.
Re: Lowest quality page 1 I recall seeing.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 7:13 pm
by Tekki
I don't have much of a problem with that, I have more of a problem wtih the fact that it shows how effective we are all being massing each others accounts in the various wars and the fact that there don't seem to be many of the so called 'scary' accounts prepared to take rank who are outside the wars.
Re: Lowest quality page 1 I recall seeing.
Posted: Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:12 pm
by REK
lol
Re: Lowest quality page 1 I recall seeing.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:12 am
by Angelos.
I know a few of these players, just because they aren't famous names means that they don't talk much on the forums or boast about stuff.
While i'm one of the last to like stats...they're entitled to play how they like.
While you are all whining about them, why don't you challenge their power if you're so unhappy about it? Instead of crying on the forums.
Angie
Re: Lowest quality page 1 I recall seeing.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:19 am
by the grim reefer
well im on page one(for now)..my defence is relatively low compared to some and my cov trained is low also(not much massable) wich leaves the conclusion..what stats make me page one??
Re: Lowest quality page 1 I recall seeing.
Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:28 am
by Sex Panther
Angelos. wrote:I know a few of these players, just because they aren't famous names means that they don't talk much on the forums or boast about stuff.
While i'm one of the last to like stats...they're entitled to play how they like.
While you are all whining about them, why don't you challenge their power if you're so unhappy about it? Instead of crying on the forums.
Angie
Not everyone crys over computer games. Maybe you talk from personal experience. But look I gave all these other lovely people something to talk about.