Page 2 of 3
Re: the ancient astronaut theory. sensible discussion/debate
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2008 3:12 am
by xXxsephirothxXx
Very interesting.. i wont write much into this because I am tired as hell and cant remember half the points since finishing... so ill just say that sure its possible that other races exist far far away... many possibilities and only long periods of time will tell aye.
Re: the ancient astronaut theory. sensible discussion/debate
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 2:21 pm
by borg
If an advance race had visited earth:
(a) they may have had limited time to stop (especially if they had met other beings more advanced than us
(b) they may have left behind simple things eg early settler in the US gave trinkets to indiginous peoples maybe in the belief that they would be unable to make use of more advanced technology
Re: the ancient astronaut theory. sensible discussion/debate
Posted: Fri Nov 14, 2008 3:31 pm
by simouny
ok, is it just me or is this thread not getting enough posts... needs a change in topic or something. i would really like to see this thread go on like can anyone really prove the theories written in books about aliens?
Here's a review of the crystal skull in Indiana Jones, it was more like SG-1 the crystal skull. nothing more to say.

Re: the ancient astronaut theory. sensible discussion/debate
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:22 am
by [KMA]Avenger
i'd also love to see the thread develop but peeps seem fixated on homo marriage

Re: the ancient astronaut theory. sensible discussion/debate
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:24 am
by simouny
lame. i hope people get more interested in this rather than social issues such as homo marriage.
Re: the ancient astronaut theory. sensible discussion/debate
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 7:51 am
by fireball37
[KMA]Avenger wrote:i have considered that and i would hope that is true, but i recently heard that the scientific community has declared (cant remember exact figure) about 90% of our DNA as junk

Not quite, the going theory is that much of our DNA is redundant, however it is far from being junk, without that 90% of not vital code, any genetic mutation would damage vital protein structures, in effect the 'useless' sections of our DNA are believed to be part of evolution, enabling mutations to be added to an organism without making it inviable, and also as a protective measure, to prevent DNA degradation.
[KMA]Avenger wrote: i'm no engineer but i think it laughable that 1, we could create a thrust motor capable of reaching such speeds and 2, that a ship with such a powerful motor would stay in 1 piece, even if the speed was increased VERY slowly.
however, someone once asked me which is faster, light or gravity, not knowing about science i was perplexed till said friend asked me which would go 1st if the sun up an vanished instantly, the light from the sun or the gravity, well we all know that light from the sun takes about 8 mins to reach us, but the gravity of the sun would go instantly

said friend knows a hell of allot more about physics than i do so who am i to argue!?
Actually, most of our space-tech can survive quite severe acceleration, simply because they're built on Earth with a constant 8.1 ms-2 to contend with. At just one g of acceleration a space craft could feasibly accelerate up to relativistic speeds within a year, at that point time dilation effectively 'fast forwards' the trip, that is, until you have to slow down again. As for your friend however, I'm afraid it would take eight minutes for gravity to vanish, just like light, it's one of the underlying principles of causality that nothing travels faster than light within this space-time, not even gravity.
[KMA]Avenger wrote:
again very true, but the Baghdad battery may have been a scaled down version of a much lager battery producing much higher voltage (still not very efficient) or a forerunner of some as yet undiscovered tech, just like someone in a few thousand years (degradation allowing) might find a Duracell and not know we had nuclear fusion.
Really? I think they would recognize our level of technology from a duracell, or at least part of it, the alloys in a duracell battery can only come about as a result of advanced chemical knowledge, the design is based of complex electrochemical theories, and overall it would clearly be made by an automated industrial process, however the Baghdad battery shows none of those things. It is the sort of thing that comes about by chance, it's a pot that was probably used for any number of things which once inadvertently produced a mild electric current, to jump from that to suggesting a full scale knowledge of electricity is very difficult.
Re: the ancient astronaut theory. sensible discussion/debate
Posted: Sat Nov 15, 2008 5:23 pm
by Demeisen
sry about the lack of response (particularly to kmas big post which needs/deserves time to reply to properly). this is an interesting topic which hopefully will continue to progress.
fireball37 wrote:I'm afraid it would take eight minutes for gravity to vanish,
yep. i wonder if teleportation will advance sufficiently for travel?
fireball37 wrote:it's one of the underlying principles of causality that nothing travels faster than light within this space-time, not even gravity.
i believe information is the exception. although i dont know how or why atm. its on my to do list to find out.
looking at the baghdad battery it doesnt look like it could work. maybe there are other versions that would have worked but thats unlikely in my view. if they discovered how to make the battery it would have been chance. if they found out by chance how to make one why would the baghdad battery not work?
also, then theres the fundamental problem with studying ancient history. we can find an artifact and figure out how it might have done something or worked. this is simply how we imagine it could have functioned, it doesnt represent the way it actually did.
im sure we can look at many things from our past and speculate on what they were capable of, and be quite wrong in our conclusions. much of what experts propose is coloured and influenced by our modern scientific knowledge.
Re: the ancient astronaut theory. sensible discussion/debate
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 2:05 am
by [KMA]Avenger
@fireball:
as i've said, i'm no scientist by any stretch of the imagination, so i'm all the more happy when put straight about points i have gotten wrong or am relaying false information.
however, as for the baghdad battery, would a future civilization still think we had advanced knowledge if they found one of our battery's from the 20's or 30's instead of a duracell?
@Liquid:
no probs with regards to your late reply's, i'll try and to refrain from such long posts from now on

i've recorded a documentary about ancient flying craft which a German has reproduced and found them to be aerodynamic and capable of flight, indeed, he's made models which do fly.
haven't seen the doc yet so will watch and report the findings

Re: the ancient astronaut theory. sensible discussion/debate
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2008 5:22 pm
by Colton
Can't believe I just read this whole thread o_O
I'll be keeping an eye on this topic
Re: the ancient astronaut theory. sensible discussion/debate
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 1:16 am
by [KMA]Avenger
instead of keeping an eye, why don't you contribute?
no one's being judged here, so your free to contribute in any manor seeing how i started this thread by saying that its my opinion and not stated as fact or a conspiracy.

Re: the ancient astronaut theory. sensible discussion/debate
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 4:36 am
by [KMA]Avenger
soz for the double post.
i still haven't seen the doc yet but i've been searching the web for the "ancient planes" that are shown in the film and here is what i've found so far...

and the location of this depiction...

and this is the site where i found those hieroglyphs...
http://www.2atoms.com/weird/ancient/plane.htm my thoughts are these...either the ancients had tech and knowledge that's long been lost, they gained knowledge from a far older civilization, "Atlantians" if you will, or we have been visited by "teachers".
only those 3 explanations fit the above mysteries and indeed the many other mysteries. i think the overwhelming evidence from all over the world warrants those 3 explanations being given SERIOUS thought by any rational thinking person.
how else can they be explained?
Re: the ancient astronaut theory. sensible discussion/debate
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 9:14 am
by Kit-Fox
Or the ancients were just as good as we are at telling stories about alien contact (ala Star Trek et all for a modern comparison) and this is just a record of such stories.
Re: the ancient astronaut theory. sensible discussion/debate
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 10:07 am
by [KMA]Avenger
i doubt that those models which do fly (not the gold models but the scaled models based on the gold ships) are the ancients representation of the SR-71 Blackbird or the enterprise lol
Re: the ancient astronaut theory. sensible discussion/debate
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:24 pm
by Thriller
[KMA]Avenger wrote:soz for the double post.
i still haven't seen the doc yet but i've been searching the web for the "ancient planes" that are shown in the film and here is what i've found so far...

and the location of this depiction...

and this is the site where i found those hieroglyphs...
http://www.2atoms.com/weird/ancient/plane.htm my thoughts are these...either the ancients had tech and knowledge that's long been lost, they gained knowledge from a far older civilization, "Atlantians" if you will, or we have been visited by "teachers".
only those 3 explanations fit the above mysteries and indeed the many other mysteries. i think the overwhelming evidence from all over the world warrants those 3 explanations being given SERIOUS thought by any rational thinking person.
how else can they be explained?
common someone with your imagination can come up with better/cooler explanations than that.
Re: the ancient astronaut theory. sensible discussion/debate
Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 12:24 am
by [KMA]Avenger
such as?