Page 2 of 2

Re: Possible Multis?

Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:00 pm
by The Black Rider
Just thought I would put my two sense in since my ID is Once Again being accused...

The White Rider explained it well. He and Pale Rider are engaged, And I am very close friend with them in RL. WR started playing a while before I took the plunge into the SGW world, and if my memory serves correctly, that would be about mid March of this year.

Trust me Noobert, no hard feelings for the accusation, it happens ALL the time! And as Lore said, it looks suspicious. I agree. That being said, I cant wait to be cleared from this constant mess so that SGW can resume being fun to play, without frequent and stretched out accusations.

Oh, and if a pic at my machine will help as well, just let me know. Ill just have to straighten up a bit first though. :)

Re: Possible Multis?

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 6:09 am
by Borek
I might be mistaken, but didn't you guys post pics of yourselves in the last thread accusing you of being multies?

As for Admin mark checking then what exactly is he going to check, they have an IP exception, they pool alliance naq, i can see how it might look suspicious, but that doesn't make them cheaters. Now if all the naq, UU and turns were constantly being sent to just 1 of the accounts then yeah i would say please check them out, but you cannot seriously tell me that it's suspicious if all the accounts in question are growing.

I have an IP exception myself, my best mate and i have the same ISP, that ISP uses a proxy server to provide web services, all the people in my town on this ISP would be flagged as having the same IP. Does this make me and my mate multies? Seriously, give them a break, anyone who can be arsed to take a pic of themselves and post it just to shut you up is definately not a cheater and it is somewhat annoying that Admin mark is being asked to take the time to check them out.

Re: Possible Multis?

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 8:51 am
by Vertigo1
Borek wrote:I might be mistaken, but didn't you guys post pics of yourselves in the last thread accusing you of being multies?


Aye, and I posted the same picture here along with a youtube video of Black Rider.

As for Admin mark checking then what exactly is he going to check, they have an IP exception, they pool alliance naq, i can see how it might look suspicious, but that doesn't make them cheaters. Now if all the naq, UU and turns were constantly being sent to just 1 of the accounts then yeah i would say please check them out, but you cannot seriously tell me that it's suspicious if all the accounts in question are growing.


Exactly my point! I'm glad atleast one person here understands that.

I'd also like to apologize for getting angry last night, but look at it from my viewpoint. This guy comes out of nowhere, and accuses my friends of cheating, hitting them with circumstantial "evidence", and then refuses to listen to their side of the story! That is something I take offense to. You could take those very same arguements and apply them to damn near every small alliance in the game. If you're going to accuse someone of something, atleast be reasonable and be willing to hear them out.

Re: Possible Multis?

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:26 am
by Noobert
I listened to their story.. but even if I believe it, it's not my decision to say "oh they don't cheat obviously due to photos". I simply posted "evidence" that known cheaters have used before and thought it was worth a check. Then I get 4 people yelling at me? Jeez.

Just because somebody has a IP excemption doesn't mean they couldn't cheat after wards B..you know that as well as anyone.

Re: Possible Multis?

Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2008 10:42 am
by Clarkey
Clearly people cannot read.
This is not a place for arguements about Noobert posting a "concern" about some accounts.

1. Suspicion posted
2. Accounts in question give their side of story
3. AdminMark or Sue clears or bans accounts

That is it.
Nothing more is needed, it will only cause people to get annoyed and angry with each other.

No more posts here unless your name is adminMark, Sue or Jason. Otherwise I will carry out my threat of warnings for ignoring a Forum Moderator and continuing to spam this thread. I have moved the rest to the Public Dump, take it there where it belongs.

Re: Possible Multis?

Posted: Wed Nov 19, 2008 9:39 pm
by formerly adminMark
Hello,

There is no evidence of cheating at this time.

May this be the last time this comes up.

adminMark

Re: Possible Multis?

Posted: Thu Nov 20, 2008 7:24 pm
by Lore
adminMark wrote:Hello,

There is no evidence of cheating at this time.

May this be the last time this comes up.

adminMark

With your response here, we will take care of it, if it does Mark.