Page 2 of 3
Re: A sign?
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 8:36 am
by O Neills
Indeed.

Re: A sign?
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 3:39 pm
by Maha Vishnu
Egeria wrote:**Hugs the one**
You did not expect that, did you?
**leaves area**
Off course the ONE did. He is a god. Gods know everyting.
Re: A sign?
Posted: Fri Jan 23, 2009 6:52 pm
by O Neills
Harakash Maha Vishnu wrote:Egeria wrote:**Hugs the one**
You did not expect that, did you?
**leaves area**
Off course the ONE did. He is a god. Gods know everyting.
Really? Then tell me, what does this mean:
Crustula est bonum, et LAUDABIT CRUSTULUM!!!!!
Re: A sign?
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 5:27 pm
by lordernest
Nothing for it is gibberish you just made up.
Re: A sign?
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:34 pm
by O Neills
Not at all. It is Latin.
Re: A sign?
Posted: Sat Jan 24, 2009 9:40 pm
by Demon Lord Razgriz
Do not listen to Ernest, he is no god. Just a bug that won't go away.
As for your pityful challenge, you said 'Pastry is good, and PRAISEWORTHY PASTRY'. Pityful little Tau'ri, why do you like pastry so much? If you wish to praise something, praise me!
Demon Lord Razgriz
Re: A sign?
Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 11:43 am
by lordernest
Hello, Hello I AM A GOD JUST LIKE YOU AND I WAS JUST JOKING CAUSE I TAKE LATIN. Don't praise the annoying god demon.
Re: A sign?
Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:01 pm
by O Neills
Demon Lord Razgriz wrote:Do not listen to Ernest, he is no god. Just a bug that won't go away.
As for your pityful challenge, you said 'Pastry is good, and PRAISEWORTHY PASTRY'. Pityful little Tau'ri, why do you like pastry so much? If you wish to praise something, praise me!
Demon Lord Razgriz
That was a very poor translation. A correct would be "A cookie is good, and he will praise the cookie."
Pastry could also be a translation, however you still mistranslated laudabit. Laudabit was also a typo. What I meant to say was "laudabis", which is YOU will praise the cookie.
And @ Earnest: Nice try. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure that if you had known what it meant, or even what language it was, you would have said so in order to make it look like you DID know everything. Instead you proved the opposite.
Re: A sign?
Posted: Sun Jan 25, 2009 2:43 pm
by unwisemonkeykid
O Neills wrote:And @ Earnest: Nice try. Perhaps I'm wrong, but I'm pretty sure that if you had known what it meant, or even what language it was, you would have said so in order to make it look like you DID know everything. Instead you proved the opposite.
Indeed he did, his reply reeks of trying to hard
Re: A sign?
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:52 am
by teesdale
ha... pitiful opponents not worth of i... i, your true god sent that message out long ago. You were all too primitive to decipher my message in time, now you will all be slaves! or die by my staff... especially the tok'ra sholvas!
Re: A sign?
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 5:04 am
by Maha Vishnu
teesdale wrote:especially the tok'ra sholvas!
I do not agree with you on many things but I do with you on this Lord Teesdale

Re: A sign?
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 8:21 am
by unwisemonkeykid
haha i love the way you ALL claim to be the true god, proving yourselves alll false gods
Re: A sign?
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 11:47 am
by O Neills
Indeed. In the end your lies will come back to bite you... OR maybe I shall send my Tauri dogs to do that, and save your lies the trouble.

Re: A sign?
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 3:19 pm
by Cole
Ajak! Anak Kel! Anack Kre Shell!
Re: A sign?
Posted: Mon Jan 26, 2009 4:39 pm
by O Neills
Hasshak mak tal shree, lok tak mekta satak O Neills! Kree!