Page 2 of 3
Re: SAB loss ratio wrong
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:23 pm
by arkangel13
Width: sm med lg
Nav Text Size: sm med lg
Sabotage Mission Report
With extreme stealth and malice, your 140 Undercover Agents sneak into the realm of EPY0N . Your Undercover Agents move stealthily through the lands of EPY0N undetected, leaving a trail of destruction.
133 of your Undercover Agents returned to provide this report.
Your Chief of Intelligence provides you with the information on the mission results
lost 18 guys on this one not 7
arkangel sabbing epyon
http://origins.stargatewars.com/spylog. ... e=Sabotage
Re: SAB loss ratio wrong
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:32 pm
by adminGary
Thank you.
The number of spies lost is correctly functioning. You did correctly lose 18 units. The report wasn't showing the correct variable.
I've uploaded a new version of the spylog page. Everything looks good from what I can see, if you could please check to make sure it is displaying the correct numbers that would be great, and confirm that this error is finally fixed.
Re: SAB loss ratio wrong
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:50 pm
by Epyon {recruiting}
we stopped fighting and im still killing stuff lol
Re: SAB loss ratio wrong
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 5:05 pm
by arkangel13
adminGary wrote:Thank you.
The number of spies lost is correctly functioning. You did correctly lose 18 units. The report wasn't showing the correct variable.
I've uploaded a new version of the spylog page. Everything looks good from what I can see, if you could please check to make sure it is displaying the correct numbers that would be great, and confirm that this error is finally fixed.
im not going for another 18 loss. also is sab really that high. 140 lose18 guys . thats 12.5 % loss IS this correct if so thats a high ratio to get 6 weps that cost 1 turn of farming. these ratios make this option almost worth less IMO
Re: SAB loss ratio wrong
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 5:07 pm
by Epyon {recruiting}
in fairness i had alot of AC at the time it was rank 9 or sumthing
Re: SAB loss ratio wrong
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 5:12 pm
by adminGary
The maximum amount of weapons you can destroy is 2 percent. We feel this allows for comfortable expansion in the future.
Re: SAB loss ratio wrong
Posted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 6:04 pm
by Richard_Destroyer
ADmin i love u!
Re: SAB loss ratio wrong
Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2009 3:00 am
by Epyon {recruiting}
i find that a fair but any news on rebalancing the race powers e.g. adding 5 % to att + def of a replicator
-25% def on asgard
+25% on Tauri att
because tauri are underpowered asgard are over powered and replicators arnt getting full benefit ?
Re: SAB loss ratio wrong
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:06 am
by Oberaan
Ok I still think the sab vs spy loss is out to lunch I just tried to sab someone I know had no ac and I killed 2% of his weaps but I lost 15 spies I know my covert is WAY better then their AC am I the only one that keeps seeing this??
Re: SAB loss ratio wrong
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 8:33 am
by Epyon {recruiting}
if ther anti is 10% of your spy you take damage if its 20% you get stonewalled
Re: SAB loss ratio wrong
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 5:21 pm
by Borek
Yeah, sabbing has gone from being very powerful to completely and utterly pointless. There is no way to tell in advance if you're going to succeed as you cannot get a report of their anti power, hell, you can't even risk a recon in the 1st place without suffering losses in many cases.
Re: SAB loss ratio wrong
Posted: Sat Feb 21, 2009 5:54 pm
by Epyon {recruiting}
i say power up covert but return it to its main set up with the exception of ac to be terminated by assassination instead of spies
Re: SAB loss ratio wrong
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 7:45 am
by none-delete-me
this bites.... gary >> fix the problem -_-
lol
Re: SAB loss ratio wrong
Posted: Tue Feb 24, 2009 11:55 pm
by adminGary
Sorry about this taking as long as it did.
The success rates on recon missions are the same.
I've reduced the chance to be detected on a successful recon mission.
I've reduced the losses to both parties to 0-5 and 5-10 percent (down from 5-10 and 10-15 percent)
Recon logs will now display both covert and anti covert units/skill levels.
I hope this fixes all the recon issues.
I don't want to make a whole bunch of changes at once and risk having sab come out extremely powerful as it was before a previous patch.
Looking forward to your feedback.
Re: SAB loss ratio wrong
Posted: Wed Feb 25, 2009 2:55 am
by Oberaan
It still does not make sense
With extreme stealth and malice, your 80 Undercover Agents sneak into the realm of ******. Your Undercover Agents move stealthily through the lands of ******* leaving a trail of destruction.
70 of your Undercover Agents returned to provide this report.
******* is unaware of your actions Your Chief of Intelligence provides you with the information on the mission results:
Ok if the mission was successful and I lost between 0 and 5 % with 80 attackers that is at most 4 spies lost yet I lost 10. My target had 150+ weapons and I destroyed 4 2% destruction for a 10% loss of my spies is not balanced in the least. Especially after it was said to be adjusted to 0 - 5 percent for a successful attack.