Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:14 am
mental doesnt mean syco 
StarGateWars Forums
These are the forums for the GateWa.rs family of text-based space-centred PBBGs
https://talk.gatewa.rs/
Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Page 2 of 7
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:21 am
Then what does it mean, Lithium?
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:28 am
Jack wrote:Then what does it mean, Lithium?
in ppl words , mental-smone able to read others thinking.
dont confound it wit mental disorder or mental illness , Jack
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:39 am
Gawd, you're such a horrible liar, Lithium.
And back on topic, I do believe that you are proving Semper's points in his very thread. Way to go genius!
And back on topic, I do believe that you are proving Semper's points in his very thread. Way to go genius!
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:43 am
Semper makes a very valid point! 
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:45 am
said by u makes sense, you said yr a syco.
also semper knows well that this war is ruining his alliance
also semper knows well that this war is ruining his alliance
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:48 am
Yes, I am a syco.
Now, I do believe we have spammed Semp's thread enough for one day, so please stop, if you do not desist then I will be forced to warn you, and you and I both know you do not want that.
Now, I do believe we have spammed Semp's thread enough for one day, so please stop, if you do not desist then I will be forced to warn you, and you and I both know you do not want that.
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:53 am
Brdavs wrote:I suppose it all simply comes down on how you define things as "bully", "misbehave" and "lie"...
You can either under the name encompase everything, from one induviduals actions/war banther/demand for repayment in a induvidual incident/writing recruitment threads utilizing "poeitc licensing" etc. OR reserve it for the more systematic practices (0 hit policies, smeere campaigns, massings of people that left your alliance etc.) and the whole empires/alliances modus operandi or how they conduct themselves and what goals do they pursue & declare. Or induviduals deliberatly mislieading of the entire community...
So, as far as the latter extreme and guys that pitched in "loling" at TAF first goes...
I gotta lol @ you people heh. Compared to you 2 for instance, noobert by empire association/charming war thread demeanor and Universe by (we all know what), TAF are regular saints.
But, ofcourse, who in SGW is spotless...
If ppl went around splitting hairs in threads like these, no alliance/empire I`ve ever heard off would be "worthy" of any recruits...
Least allone the "educating" TLE, "purgatory creating" FUA or the likes of NS, FS, etc. etc. List goes on and is waaay more detailed.
you aks who in SGW is spotless i tell you The Pegasus Empire - TPE we help everyplayer who comes i cant say anything about TO or DDE or even NS but they are all at war thats just it when you go to war you cant say your not a bully if a big kid (bully) picks on you and you fight back your just as bad as he is.
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:56 am
You are a bully if you defend yourself from a bully? 
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 6:58 am
no i didnt say that my firend i said your just as bad as they are if you do.
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:01 am
In short, you were spamming that thread. Glad we agree.lithium wrote:duderanch: my post in NS recruitment was a reply of the misleading infos that were being given against TA.
Hmm.. maybe when you stop doing just that, being a bigmouth and actually do something war-like?lithium wrote:poor semper, when would u realize that its stargate WARS not bigmouths.
Glad you're amused. Fact of the matter is that you are of no consequence to anyone.lithium wrote:wars happens and you know the reason (NS protecting a scamer). also complaining about their army size is funny.
Enjoy your time in the big house.. or should I say psych ward:Hm. Yet Jack gives a better show of composure as you do. *hands Lithium a PW check-in card* Here. Check yourself in and you won't be isolated.lithium wrote:jack u are a mental i always knew
@Sammael: TPE are not 'spotless'.
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:13 am
Universe wrote:In short, you were spamming that thread. Glad we agree.lithium wrote:duderanch: my post in NS recruitment was a reply of the misleading infos that were being given against TA.Hmm.. maybe when you stop doing just that, being a bigmouth and actually do something war-like?lithium wrote:poor semper, when would u realize that its stargate WARS not bigmouths.Glad you're amused. Fact of the matter is that you are of no consequence to anyone.lithium wrote:wars happens and you know the reason (NS protecting a scamer). also complaining about their army size is funny.Hm. Yet Jack gives a better show of composure as you do. *hands Lithium a PW check-in card* Here. Check yourself in and you won't be isolated.lithium wrote:jack u are a mental i always knew
for the records are u the one scamming the brokers (by removing a 0)
this is why the TA fraction called TA Masers are dealing wit NS.
they are being called bully due to massing a scamer and those who protects him/her.
@Sammael: TPE are not 'spotless'.
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:21 am
That remark was utterly inappropriate.
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:23 am
ok i am saying that if a bully start picking on you and you defened yourself then u r as bad as him but if you talk to him or ateacher/your alliance leader you cant be a bad as him
and TPE is spotless we havent got one on us.
and TPE is spotless we havent got one on us.
Re: Alliance Refrences good or Bad
Posted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:24 am
lithium wrote:Universe wrote:In short, you were spamming that thread. Glad we agree.lithium wrote:duderanch: my post in NS recruitment was a reply of the misleading infos that were being given against TA.Hmm.. maybe when you stop doing just that, being a bigmouth and actually do something war-like?lithium wrote:poor semper, when would u realize that its stargate WARS not bigmouths.Glad you're amused. Fact of the matter is that you are of no consequence to anyone.lithium wrote:wars happens and you know the reason (NS protecting a scamer). also complaining about their army size is funny.Hm. Yet Jack gives a better show of composure as you do. *hands Lithium a PW check-in card* Here. Check yourself in and you won't be isolated.lithium wrote:jack u are a mental i always knew
for the records are u the one scamming the brokers (by removing a 0)
this is why the TA fraction called TA Masers are dealing wit NS.
they are being called bully due to massing a scamer and those who protects him/her.
@Sammael: TPE are not 'spotless'.
O.m.g.
You have got to be kidding me.
Is that your reason for fighting NS?!
I'd love to hear from someone I brokered to and removed a '0', because you'll not find anyone who will truthfully say I did such a thing.You're confusing your issues, Lith.
I'd appreciate a chance to talk to you to find out what 'broker scam' I supposedly committed.