StarGateWars Forums

when you accuse Shadow Pact of crying out for help, provide some proof next time?

As Scott said, if this had happened, it had to have happened when he was still leading SS, and he said he didnt, and we all know hes a man of his word. If Scott did not cry out for help, then the only other person that could possibly have done so regarding leadership would be me, and I havent called for help either...

So proof please?

proof
that means i care about shadow dragon or everything that means ss
so cry more
left u a nice pm ingame
long live ss

bebita wrote:proof
that means i care about shadow dragon or everything that means ss
so cry more
left u a nice pm ingame
long live ss

I asked a simple question and you throw insults?

very big of you indeed!

I wouldve been easier to say that there is no proof, I dont nor have I ever asked for help, I have however been asked to help others,

bebita wrote:proof
that means i care about shadow dragon or everything that means ss
so cry more
left u a nice pm ingame
long live ss

sabbing someone when he asks you for proof of your accusations, how childish. Lucky for us it only proves our previous points though, how you lack the necissary intelligence to reason w other players, funny to be honoust.

ChaoticNeutral wrote:Lucky for us it only proves our previous points though, how you lack the necissary intelligence to reason w other players

Or maybe just lacks any reason to?

S1eepy wrote:

ChaoticNeutral wrote:Lucky for us it only proves our previous points though, how you lack the necissary intelligence to reason w other players

Or maybe just lacks any reason to?

or maybe he just enjoys war and doesn't care if he has a good reason or not

When other people accused Wader of being a feeder earlier on we were said we had to come with proof when we make accusations...so let me guess...

Again this counts: accusations should be met with proof, unless you're in TCC, just like feeding is bad unless you're in TCC?

That puts a whole different view on a fair gaming policy to be honoust.

ChaoticNeutral wrote:When other people accused Wader of being a feeder earlier on we were said we had to come with proof when we make accusations...so let me guess...

Again this counts: accusations should be met with proof, unless you're in TCC, just like feeding is bad unless you're in TCC?

That puts a whole different view on a fair gaming policy to be honoust.

u should know
spy is never desconspired
and is not like u are cheating that is required a proof
all is important is that i know
we know
and for that i love u

ChaoticNeutral wrote:When other people accused Wader of being a feeder earlier on we were said we had to come with proof when we make accusations...so let me guess...

Again this counts: accusations should be met with proof, unless you're in TCC, just like feeding is bad unless you're in TCC?

That puts a whole different view on a fair gaming policy to be honoust.

be careful what accusations you make lest I decide to come show you and your empire some love...

Looks like we solve everything with pure power. Maybe that's the right way in a war game anyway.

Sorrow wrote:Looks like we solve everything with pure power. Maybe that's the right way in a war game anyway.

if only we could kill AC units!

High Empty wrote:

Sorrow wrote:Looks like we solve everything with pure power. Maybe that's the right way in a war game anyway.

if only we could kill AC units!

If only we could kill UP