StarGateWars Forums

Tetrismonkey wrote:

Mordack wrote:"People should be very free with sex, but they should draw the line at goats."

- Elton John

What better way to make a point than with a quote!

Hahah, touche.

My own personal view is that it boils down to an issue of consent. We've yet to develop a way of communicating coherently with animals, and therefore it's difficult to establish whether or not they'd actually want to have sex with us. Ergo having sex with one is 'not consentual' if anything, therefore implying rape. Unless you're a horse whisperer, I'm not sure there's a way to defend it.

it's just wrong... but free will is a double edged sword... kikaz must have went to see a donkey show. Prolly wasn't what he expected... Good old tijuana.

A paramedic friend in toronto still gets reports of (and even had deal with a case) of small rodents dieing and getting stuck in people's rear ends( falls under this category right?)... grosses me out to an extreme

Not at all Thriller, someone mentioned in an MSN convo while I was browsing forums and me wanting a good laugh figured I'd post it.

I'm not really interested in this topic, but since every single mention of the term has been misspelled, I figured I'd mention that it's spelled "bestiality".

On another note, consent could theoretically be derived from a dog humping your leg. Nasty buggers.

Agapooka

Thriller wrote:it's just wrong... but free will is a double edged sword... kikaz must have went to see a donkey show. Prolly wasn't what he expected... Good old tijuana.

A paramedic friend in toronto still gets reports of (and even had deal with a case) of small rodents dieing and getting stuck in people's rear ends( falls under this category right?)... grosses me out to an extreme

That was a torture in the first world war...its just wrong,too wrong to even think about it!

I think they prefer to call it "Interspecies erotica".

damn i was expecting some links

anyways. . .

this is wrong as the animal doesnt have the ability to choose to take part in sexual activities with humans. only exception would be if the animal liked doing what it was asked to do. otherwise you're just raping an aardvark, ie not having a consensual thing.

theres always going to be a risk if injury to both parties as its not natural. also, theres the inevitable moment when you explain to the doctor how your canary managed to get where it did.

One month and nobody's corrected the spelling...

LiQuiD wrote:this is wrong as the animal doesnt have the ability to choose to take part in sexual activities with humans. only exception would be if the animal liked doing what it was asked to do. otherwise you're just raping an aardvark, ie not having a consensual thing.

Is this a windup or are you a full blown vegan?

Brdavs wrote:Is this a windup or are you a full blown vegan?

not wind up, not vegan.

because i think its morally wrong to rape an aardvark you think im a vegan?

theres a word for some people. they are called dog botherers and they come from the countryside. they aint cool.

Parrots, incidentally, are no exception to the consent rule. Their speech is mimicry, and not derived from thought. Just because you're always up for it, and your parrot hears you, it doesn't necessarily mean he shares your promiscuity.

Mordack wrote:Parrots, incidentally, are no exception to the consent rule. Their speech is mimicry, and not derived from thought. Just because you're always up for it, and your parrot hears you, it doesn't necessarily mean he shares your promiscuity.

Polly want a **Filtered**..

2 questions: you asking him for 1 or what?

if yes to the first question, is your name polly?

Polly is a generally used name to refer to parrots..
I'm curious what is the **filtered** word though.