Page 2 of 2
Re: MS Suicide run / Ramming
Posted: Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:55 pm
by Dubby_CompGamerGeek2
I like the idea of MS ramming, tbh... that'd be cool...
It would need some safeguards in place to avoid too much exploitation, but it's a rocking good idea.
Re: MS Suicide run / Ramming
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2009 2:04 pm
by Bullseye
I like the idea, but have it the same as planet defences. It has to be of a certain size to successfully damage the mothership. Like fleets against a planets defence, gets completely 0'd if it doesnt meet a certain %.
So that way the rammer would have to atleast have a decent size or risk losing his mothership and causing 0 damage.
Re: MS Suicide run / Ramming
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 4:36 pm
by Lore
Sarevok wrote:Lore wrote:If any update about MS should come out, it should be a way to put them out of business for an extended period of time, not 1 turn.
I doubt this would help, at least as far as i can see.
Would just allow the large MS, unless they got jumped by an entire alliance, to effectively put out-of-commission any average MS, since they could effectively sit on them, disabling them for a period of time (instead of the owner just waiting for the right time to re-buy weapons)
Well I would assume 2 things,
1. it would/could disable BOTH ships
2. a single ship could only disable a single ship per day.
other wise you just have 1 big alliance MS rammer floating around LOL
Re: MS Suicide run / Ramming
Posted: Wed Oct 14, 2009 4:44 pm
by Sarevok
So more of a Ship4Ship style? If they have a specified minimum power?
Re: MS Suicide run / Ramming
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 10:55 am
by th0r_
Well, players with big MS will be able to mass other MS even easier. It still favorites big MSs more than smaller users.
Re: MS Suicide run / Ramming
Posted: Fri Oct 16, 2009 11:03 am
by Bullseye
And so it should favor the big motherships, otherwise whats the point in having a big one. If they were easy to take down, motherships would become pointless.