Page 2 of 2

Re: ms Sabbing

Posted: Fri Oct 09, 2009 6:22 pm
by Lore
Tetrismonkey wrote:How does this not have potential? I see lots of it. The ability to treat the MS's systems, as "weapons". To have another way to kill an MS's shields and Weapons when you cannot take it down any other way? Its a cheaper solution to massing the big MS's.

Let me give you an example:

Say a small alliance declares war on a mediam size alliance. Small alliance has good strikes, and coverts, but weak MS's. (Which most of us know that those stats can be build very fast and easy, where as a good MS takes MONTHS to build) However, the other alliance has very very good MS's. Thus, it would cost the small alliance lots of naq to kill the MS's. So instead, after the defenses are down, and covert, the small alliance begins to sab away attack weapons and MS weapons and shields. Shields and weapons are down on MS, making it easier and better for the small alliance.

I find it hard to beleive just because you dont like the idea, you say there is no potential. I suggest looking further than a foot in front of you.



Well For the most part I agree with him, it has little to no potential.

1. Cant be sabbed on PPT, so its useless
2. Can't be sabbed if sent away, so again useless
3. If instatuted, MS strategies will also change to overcome it by
A. Leaving the MS dead in the water after the daily MS massings are done resulting in nothing to sabb
B. Getting covert phased prior to MS buildup, and possibly/probably remaining covert phased during MS massings due the friends allies constantly spying to keep the covert phase up until PPT, ship sent out serching, or MS masses itself massing others.

This also just adds another "down" side to battles. when a MS is built up, you can't sell it off or untrain it. BUT you can train alot of spies, sabb like mad, then untrain them, so its a stabb in the back for MS builders.

I'm neither for nor against it, I have arguments for both sides, but I am also convenced in the long term it will acomplish nothing as there are clear and easy ways to get around/neutralise the threat.

Re: ms Sabbing

Posted: Sat Oct 10, 2009 12:52 am
by Lithium
to sab a big MS smone shall build big cov lvl. actually MS builders buy big cov lvl coz they can afford.

however i like this idea to be able whatever the cost.

now in order to be able the MS sabing must be added asseparate form not within the normal sab.

this way smone shold pic the form of sabing only the MS no weaps involved.

its benefical in wars coz ppl that are bored get into ascending for 6 months or more while its ment to play wars.
its benefical if smone never build a MS but cov and its able to do damage.

the game options shall be used against each other :
we use MS to mass def , cov to sab , ac to kill cov, and MS vs MS , since we sab weaps why not sab MS shields/volley.

in general will bring strategies to the wide medium players and will make those who play on MS spend some more T in cov lvl.