AssAsinX wrote:THis is my view towards wc3 and sc..
if u wanna do stander 1v1, 2v2 games, go starcraft, its much simpler and tests skills. sc isnt good for its ums, but i do like diplomacy maps
if u wanna do custom maps, wc3 is better of the coding.. risk devo and dota
i dont like heros and spells, adds to more hero micro rather then actual units.. but a pro can do both im sure..
PS. Star craft story line is much better
Ya I like the Starcraft storyline better too, I still think Warcraft is better for both, but I am good at Micro'ing heroes and troops, Starcraft I think is easier to because there are no heroes to micro or worry about. It can really go by person to person.
After you defeat boxeR or NAGA we'll see...
No idea what you're talking about
SC legends...
Why would I want to play them at an inferior game?
Given that the SG: Worlds game seems to have died...again...
I'm crossing my fingers for Star Wars: The Old Republic...it looks like it'll be fun. And since it's being made by Bioware, it might actually live up to my expectations...
If you really want something challenging...try Sins of a Solar Empire...I've played it a couple of times and it can get pretty intense...
"Arrakis teaches the attitude of the knife - chopping off what's incomplete and saying: "Now, it's complete because it's ended here."
Eternal Usul wrote:Given that the SG: Worlds game seems to have died...again...
I'm crossing my fingers for Star Wars: The Old Republic...it looks like it'll be fun. And since it's being made by Bioware, it might actually live up to my expectations...
If you really want something challenging...try Sins of a Solar Empire...I've played it a couple of times and it can get pretty intense...
[/url]
