StarGateWars Forums

Dont want to get in you twos squabble, but alot of people store UU in Attackers. Especially when it a high volume and your already over loaded with lifers.

Pointless suggestion because.

1.

It already exists,

The amount of anti-intelligence units you lose (win or lose the attack is the same) is their defence power divided by your power per anti-intelligence agent to a maximum of 3% of your anti-intelligence agents. This means using anti-intelligence on a stronger defence force loses more anti-intelligence agents.

Tho tbh I've never tested hitting 2 different defences with the same AI out.

2.

You don't need any more help to anti. I could rattle through the various anti strategies I use to leave my enemies baffled and confused and without millions of spies but I'd bore you, suffice to say i've taken millions of spies whilst my enemies were online without them noticing, but then people might use them against me, so Ill keep them to myself . Suffice to say, anti'ing does not need to be changed.

3.

If strikes remain pratically untouchable as they are, would you not say it was rather unfair to make people that your massing have extra functions of the game thrown against them.

..

I could probably come up with some more reasons but thatll do I think .

1.
Sorry , didn't saw that

2. I know of some uber secret secret, but I'll keep it to myself.

3.
I said that attack super soldiers are allowed to get killed , but normal attackers not.
You'll see the real hero's when ppl start massing with those

dastupy wrote:3.
I said that attack super soldiers are allowed to get killed , but normal attackers not.
You'll see the real hero's when ppl start massing with those

I CAN SEE THE LIGHT! (realizes he left the light on above he's head)
Oh...

I see the point about storing UU in normal attackers, and thus would say, if your attack is 10x (or more? ) the defenders defense, you should be able to kill super attacker. And also, if your attack is 10x the defense, you should be able to kill more easily. But maybe with what schuesseled said, it's less needed?

when u ac a 100b def using 200b strike u get normal losses while where the def is 10b u get very few losses in AC , u gotta experience ACing b4 asking modifications

Lithium wrote:when u ac a 100b def using 200b strike u get normal losses while where the def is 10b u get very few losses in AC , u gotta experience ACing b4 asking modifications

Ok thanks bud , didn't know that

any time

Does this mean your withdrawing your suggestion? (in a manner of speaking)

Yes

You can already AC someone through their defence though with low losses, especially if your AC level is high compared to their Covert level.