StarGateWars Forums

haha fair enough.
after enough discussion in this thread i might create a vote for how the winner will be decided out of all the flawed options haha

Had more of a think about the point based system though i need to think about it some more.
Scores are to be posted on the forum by the VICTIM instead of the attacker so its slightly more fair. In case of discrepancy attack log and alliance attack logs should be posted. Relying on everyone understanding this is a fun war and being fair for this.
Points will then be counted at the end of the war or a tally kept.

Points awarded:
When your defense is taken out 2 points are given to the attacker. If more than one person took part in taking down your defense then you may award 1 point to 2 people.
When you are AC'd down to 10b or below you award the attacker 1 point.
When your attack is taken down to below (insert figure) you must award the attacker 1 point (maybe two dunno yet).
If all 3 stats are taken down by one person one additional point is awarded.

(Additional Extra option)
At the end everyone who took part votes for one person who they think did the best. Each vote counts for 1 (or 2) points.

Whaa? 1 point for ac'ing someone down to....
10bil? That is 10k troops, Make that an amount of troops, and make it 150-200k or something.

how big would the covert be with 150k-200k troops? any why have it in amount of troops rather than in power?

Man Called Jim wrote:how big would the covert be with 150k-200k troops? any why have it in amount of troops rather than in power?

becasue civert levels then play a massive part, putting smaller covert levels at a big disadvantage.. but evry1 troops die at the same rate

covert levels would still play a massive part because the higher your covert level the less troops you would need to say make a 100b covert

Man Called Jim wrote:covert levels would still play a massive part because the higher your covert level the less troops you would need to say make a 100b covert

It would be a huge waste of ats for anyone to AC down to 10bil power, most people who AC leave them with maybe 150-200k troops, Anyone in war that dosnt have at least 600k trained into covert at Level 32 is easily open to sabbing with very little losses to the sabber.

alright then fair enough 1 point for acing down to 200k troops.
any other suggestions?

yeah PF members should start with 1,000 points

What ya think jim??

Yeah points should also be awarded according to how much i know you

Do people think the point system i came up with will work at all?

it could work but it has to be kept an eye on

is alliances of particpants were kool with it, you could setup a temp alliance so all logs be recorded...

thats actually a good idea AOH, would just take a little effort. Would people put in the effort of doing that?

Aesthetics of Hate wrote:is alliances of particpants were kool with it, you could setup a temp alliance so all logs be recorded...

As Long as every alliance and player agrees to it, this can be done. If not then it cannot, good idea tho.

As for the Point system like you idea Jim

Point System

1. Everyone starts at 0 Points.

2. Defense
2a. Mass a defense to 0 on your own 2 points, to the attacker
2b. Massed a defense over 500bill, 3 points, to attacker
2c. Massed with 1 other member of the FFA Game, 1 point to attacker
2d. Massing with another outside player, 1 point to the defender

3. Anti - Covert.
3a. Taken a Covert down to 200k Units, 1 Point to attacker
3b. Covert Saved during on line Battle, 1 point to defender

4. Stabbing
4a. Taken a Strike Down to 150bill, 2 Points to the Attacker
4b. Down to 200bill, 1 point to attacker
4c. Down to 150bill with A Member of FFA 1 point to each.

5. Online Battles
5a. Win a Online Battle will add 5 points on.
5b. Loose a Online battle we will take off 5 points (this is subject to change or deletion)

6. Open For Suggestion

~sam

Nice ideas! Want a few more comments and suggestions before i get it up and running