StarGateWars Forums

darius eoiwe wrote:Where is this vulturing policy provided so that we could have known before this incident happens? different alliances have different policies - either way - shouldn't have you sent a warning instead of just massing since this policy isn't stated anywhere public - this also begs the question that if he hit you once then its a legit hit. For most alliance it becomes vulturing if you hit the player more than three times and its unprofitable attacks also.

dastupy wrote:Have fun both (to darius, cant we just let them have a fun 1vs 1, without all the bickering?)

Dmonix wrote:

darius eoiwe wrote:Where is this vulturing policy provided so that we could have known before this incident happens? different alliances have different policies - either way - shouldn't have you sent a warning instead of just massing since this policy isn't stated anywhere public - this also begs the question that if he hit you once then its a legit hit. For most alliance it becomes vulturing if you hit the player more than three times and its unprofitable attacks also.

We are MaYHeM, didn't think we had to post it

Go Andy you crazy man you

darius eoiwe wrote:

dastupy wrote:Have fun both (to darius, cant we just let them have a fun 1vs 1, without all the bickering?)

Im a self rightous idealist - what can i say

Dmonix wrote:

darius eoiwe wrote:Where is this vulturing policy provided so that we could have known before this incident happens? different alliances have different policies - either way - shouldn't have you sent a warning instead of just massing since this policy isn't stated anywhere public - this also begs the question that if he hit you once then its a legit hit. For most alliance it becomes vulturing if you hit the player more than three times and its unprofitable attacks also.

We are MaYHeM, didn't think we had to post it

Go Andy you crazy man you

Aye I know well of you and FUALL

dastupy wrote:Have fun both (to darius, cant we just let them have a fun 1vs 1, without all the bickering?)

darius eoiwe wrote:

knight37 wrote:Ragnvald[ The Dark Crusade - Viking]
Living God of the AJNA
{Temporarily on the Protected Planets Treaty...}

Declaration of a vendetta while on PPT?

Allow me to set the facts.

I am the one that farmed your 43b naq.

You tried to attack me.

You failed, so you decided to take the naq from my alliance instead of me.

You got massed because you are now a vulture (we are at war).

If you had just taken it from me then none of this would be happening.

P.S. You can include me in on this too.

Where is this vulturing policy provided so that we could have known before this incident happens? different alliances have differnet polocies - either way - shouldnt have you sent a warning instead of just massing since this policy isnt stated anywhere public - this alos begs the question that if he hit you once then its a legit hit. For most alliance it becomes vulturing if you hit the player more than three times and its unprofitable attacks also. Not very respectful i suppose but I suppose all the attacker saw was a small young alliance which is an easy target since it currently doesnt have the capibility to respond in kind

In future publish your policies regarding the rest iof the players in sgw - im on the end of my wick with alliances saying to me - its vulturing when everyone has a definition which differs. After all its the risk you run when you dont declare a standard war or a war of attrition.

knight37 wrote:

darius eoiwe wrote:

knight37 wrote:Ragnvald[ The Dark Crusade - Viking]
Living God of the AJNA
{Temporarily on the Protected Planets Treaty...}

Declaration of a vendetta while on PPT?

Allow me to set the facts.

I am the one that farmed your 43b naq.

You tried to attack me.

You failed, so you decided to take the naq from my alliance instead of me.

You got massed because you are now a vulture (we are at war).

If you had just taken it from me then none of this would be happening.

P.S. You can include me in on this too.

Where is this vulturing policy provided so that we could have known before this incident happens? different alliances have differnet polocies - either way - shouldnt have you sent a warning instead of just massing since this policy isnt stated anywhere public - this alos begs the question that if he hit you once then its a legit hit. For most alliance it becomes vulturing if you hit the player more than three times and its unprofitable attacks also. Not very respectful i suppose but I suppose all the attacker saw was a small young alliance which is an easy target since it currently doesnt have the capibility to respond in kind

In future publish your policies regarding the rest iof the players in sgw - im on the end of my wick with alliances saying to me - its vulturing when everyone has a definition which differs. After all its the risk you run when you dont declare a standard war or a war of attrition.

Ignorance of the law will not hold up in court, nor will it here.

I suggest you do some homework and find out who is at war and who is not. (It is not that hard, as you found this section of the forum)

dastupy wrote:Have fun both (to darius, cant we just let them have a fun 1vs 1, without all the bickering?)

knight37 wrote:

darius eoiwe wrote:

knight37 wrote:Ragnvald[ The Dark Crusade - Viking]
Living God of the AJNA
{Temporarily on the Protected Planets Treaty...}

Declaration of a vendetta while on PPT?

Allow me to set the facts.

I am the one that farmed your 43b naq.

You tried to attack me.

You failed, so you decided to take the naq from my alliance instead of me.

You got massed because you are now a vulture (we are at war).

If you had just taken it from me then none of this would be happening.

P.S. You can include me in on this too.

Where is this vulturing policy provided so that we could have known before this incident happens? different alliances have differnet polocies - either way - shouldnt have you sent a warning instead of just massing since this policy isnt stated anywhere public - this alos begs the question that if he hit you once then its a legit hit. For most alliance it becomes vulturing if you hit the player more than three times and its unprofitable attacks also. Not very respectful i suppose but I suppose all the attacker saw was a small young alliance which is an easy target since it currently doesnt have the capibility to respond in kind

In future publish your policies regarding the rest iof the players in sgw - im on the end of my wick with alliances saying to me - its vulturing when everyone has a definition which differs. After all its the risk you run when you dont declare a standard war or a war of attrition.

Ignorance of the law will not hold up in court, nor will it here.

I suggest you do some homework and find out who is at war and who is not. (It is not that hard, as you found this section of the forum)

Semper wrote:

dastupy wrote:Have fun both (to darius, cant we just let them have a fun 1vs 1, without all the bickering?)

I didn't know you guys did that.....

darius eoiwe wrote:

knight37 wrote:

darius eoiwe wrote:

knight37 wrote:Ragnvald[ The Dark Crusade - Viking]
Living God of the AJNA
{Temporarily on the Protected Planets Treaty...}

Declaration of a vendetta while on PPT?

Allow me to set the facts.

I am the one that farmed your 43b naq.

You tried to attack me.

You failed, so you decided to take the naq from my alliance instead of me.

You got massed because you are now a vulture (we are at war).

If you had just taken it from me then none of this would be happening.

P.S. You can include me in on this too.

Where is this vulturing policy provided so that we could have known before this incident happens? different alliances have differnet polocies - either way - shouldnt have you sent a warning instead of just massing since this policy isnt stated anywhere public - this alos begs the question that if he hit you once then its a legit hit. For most alliance it becomes vulturing if you hit the player more than three times and its unprofitable attacks also. Not very respectful i suppose but I suppose all the attacker saw was a small young alliance which is an easy target since it currently doesnt have the capibility to respond in kind

In future publish your policies regarding the rest iof the players in sgw - im on the end of my wick with alliances saying to me - its vulturing when everyone has a definition which differs. After all its the risk you run when you dont declare a standard war or a war of attrition.

Ignorance of the law will not hold up in court, nor will it here.

I suggest you do some homework and find out who is at war and who is not. (It is not that hard, as you found this section of the forum)

Laws are usually clear - this however isnt but if you can show me a post or thread thats public here and has being there since the start of the war then i stand corrected - looks like the pigs are still flying