StarGateWars Forums

Confirming I have personally converted over 9000 Muslims by the provided method.

Edit: damn you spam temple

i liked the

God the father, God the son and God the holy ghost, these three are the one true god

part.
which just makes me think:
considering that, praying to icons is aboundant in christianity,
so is praying to marry (which by all means, was just mortal) and the large amount of beliefs adopted from pagan tribes in africa via missionaries,
who is the real idoler?

Radiance wrote:

Allah had no son, therefore Allah is not God.

1. me da had a son (meself), therfore me da is god.
2. yahweh had a son, therfore yahweh is god
3. yahweh's son was god

1+2+3 -> oi am god

q.e.d.

hitchkok wrote:i liked the

God the father, God the son and God the holy ghost, these three are the one true god

part.
which just makes me think:
considering that, praying to icons is aboundant in christianity,
so is praying to marry (which by all means, was just mortal) and the large amount of beliefs adopted from pagan tribes in africa via missionaries,
who is the real idoler?

Oh, but Hitchkok.. see my new thread for information on how to think of Roman Catholics!

Radiance wrote:

Allah had no son, therefore Allah is not God.

http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0042/0042_01.asp

To be honest, if you take the new testament as true, this argument is valid.
the new testament states that god had a son.
therfore, if Allah had no son, he isn't god.

Corran Horne wrote:

Radiance wrote:

Allah had no son, therefore Allah is not God.

1. me da had a son (meself), therfore me da is god.
2. yahweh had a son, therfore yahweh is god
3. yahweh's son was god

1+2+3 -> oi am god

q.e.d.

No. nowhere does it say that anyone that has a son is a god.
A implies B does NOT imply that B implies A.
in formal logic
~((A -> B) -> (B -> A))
-> stands for implies
~ stands for negative.

Radiance wrote:see my new thread for information on how to think of Roman Catholics!

yeah... whash d'ya think of me, loik?

hitchkok wrote:

Corran Horne wrote:

Radiance wrote:

Allah had no son, therefore Allah is not God.

1. me da had a son (meself), therfore me da is god.
2. yahweh had a son, therfore yahweh is god
3. yahweh's son was god

1+2+3 -> oi am god

q.e.d.

No. nowhere does it say that anyone that has a son is a god.
A implies B does NOT imply that B implies A.
in formal logic
~((A -> B) -> (B -> A))
-> stands for implies
~ stands for negative.

orly? ehmm... it's.. it's, loik, mind-boggling...

Rienna wrote:

Radiance wrote:

Allah had no son, therefore Allah is not God.

http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0042/0042_01.asp

I read the whole thing. I kept waiting for teh funny? there was no funny

yha.... i just keep thinking imagine a world without religion.....

thaltek wrote:

Rienna wrote:

Radiance wrote:

Allah had no son, therefore Allah is not God.

http://www.chick.com/reading/tracts/0042/0042_01.asp

I read the whole thing. I kept waiting for teh funny? there was no funny

yha.... i just keep thinking imagine a world without religion.....

We can make it work!

Religion is saviour for a good bunch of people that would solve nothing and worsen things.

hmm... isn'sh a world withoush religion a world with religion of nosh having a religion?
or... religion is basically an ideology.. so yis are askin' for a world withoush ideology.. and thash would be, loik, boring: no treehuggers, gay activists, feminists, no al gore, conspiracy theories, vegetarians, no politians.. no obama... no sustainable economic growth, european integration, no eurosceptics...
no "intelligensh discussion" section.. unless someone loiks discussing, loik, boring stuff... loik "why being an egg sucks?"

Corran Horne wrote: religion is basically an ideology.. so yis are askin' for a world withoush ideology..

NO.
religion isn't an ideology, and ideology isn't religion.