Page 2 of 4

Re: Complaint structure?

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 6:41 am
by Clarkey
Zeratul wrote:what makes you so sure the person was not verbally warned...

and the thread was removed from sight, so action was taken...

The user notes are empty indicating nothing was done.
The fact i got no response from the GM indicates nothing was done besides dumping the thread.

You still don't comment on the fact that one of your GM's blatently ignored my PM when I asked them about the action resulting from my report.

You clearly accept this sort of standard.

Re: Complaint structure?

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:08 am
by Clarkey
Tetrismonkey wrote:In the mean time, I suggest either keeping your tone down and waiting, or speak with Solus. Yes, we are sorry you were not notified by the GM about the report and yes we are sorry the outcome you wanted did not happend. Actions were taken.

Speak with Solus, lol and what get ignored again? You're funny. :lol:

I will wait for Admins to review it.

Re: Complaint structure?

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:29 am
by Clarkey
Earendil wrote:
Dean Winchester wrote:The user notes are empty indicating nothing was done.
The fact i got no response from the GM indicates nothing was done besides dumping the thread.

You still don't comment on the fact that one of your GM's blatently ignored my PM when I asked them about the action resulting from my report.

You clearly accept this sort of standard.


You should know, not all verbal warnings are put into the user logs.

The thread was dumped, plain and simple, I'm sure several warnings could of been handed out instead of doing that.

I've talked to Solus and I think he did what was right considering the situation and the atmosphere of the thread and those posting

And ignoring my PM was right too?

The atmosphere of the thread was nothing really and if the thread had continued at that atmosphere it would not have increased to personal attacks such as what Buck did. Buck as an ex-admin knew exactly what he was doing when he carried out that personal attack on me.

Re: Complaint structure?

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:34 am
by Clarkey
Earendil wrote:I'm sure the thread would of.
And as for ignoring your pm, it was his choice for what ever reason. If that was the case, then you pm the next in line.

I did, and i got Zeratul who basically told me it has nothing to do with the admins. #-o

Re: Complaint structure?

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:42 am
by Clarkey
Tetrismonkey wrote:So find another GM to speak with Solus. Find alternate routes. Yes, what happend is inexcusable, and in no way right. We all make mistakes. Its if we learn from them or not that determines how things will play out in the future.

We as mods have a section where we can speak with the other mods on issues, so PMin another mod would have done wonders.

Tetrismonkey please can you respect my request that you stay out of this thread.

I have posted here for feedback from the Admins and maybe the GM in question.

As you can see no other Moderator has posted in this thread because it is to do with the Admins and the GM in question.

So thank for your attempted help, but it is neither necessary nor wanted. Especially as you have also pushed the forum rules of abuse. So please kindly stay out of this thread.

Re: Complaint structure?

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:51 am
by Clarkey
Tetrismonkey wrote:Well Clarkey, if I can help the situation by providing another side of input, or another perspective on a situation, then I honestly see no harm.

Its not just for the Admins eyes. As this will affect the Mod Team as a whole. So in that case, then yes, I can and will be in any thread that affects the team im apart of until either I deem it nessasary to no longer speak or my superiouers say so.

Many of my points still stand Clarkey, along with other alternatives to how YOU can handle this situation.

Tetrismonkey i ask you again to respect my wish that you remain out of this thread.

I do not have and never will have and interest of what you say as a Moderator or as a person on these forums because you just like myself have shown that if the circumstances are 'just' that you WILL abuse your power for a personal gain. You cannot deny that and you cannot deny that it WILL happen again when those circumstances again are 'just'.

Therefore i ask you again please remain out of this thread as have other Mods.

I am directing this thread to the Admins. Your input is of no interest to me.

Re: Complaint structure?

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 8:56 am
by Clarkey
Tetrismonkey wrote:
Dean Winchester wrote:
Tetrismonkey wrote:Well Clarkey, if I can help the situation by providing another side of input, or another perspective on a situation, then I honestly see no harm.

Its not just for the Admins eyes. As this will affect the Mod Team as a whole. So in that case, then yes, I can and will be in any thread that affects the team im apart of until either I deem it nessasary to no longer speak or my superiouers say so.

Many of my points still stand Clarkey, along with other alternatives to how YOU can handle this situation.

Tetrismonkey i ask you again to respect my wish that you remain out of this thread.

I do not have and never will have and interest of what you say as a Moderator or as a person on these forums because you just like myself have shown that if the circumstances are 'just' that you WILL abuse your power for a personal gain. You cannot deny that and you cannot deny that it WILL happen again when those circumstances again are 'just'.

Therefore i ask you again please remain out of this thread as have other Mods.

I am directing this thread to the Admins. Your input is of no interest to me.



HAve you taken this complaint to the Ombudsman? In a thread for them to go to the Admins with?

Tetrismomkey i have asked you to remain out of this.

Re: Complaint structure?

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:09 am
by Clarkey
Tetrismonkey wrote:If this issue has yet to be taken to the Ombudsman, then I suggest taking it to them. Let them do what they are supose to do.

This thread is now pointless seeing as you have missed a step in the Complaint System.

Tetrismonkey as i cannot add you to a Foe List please stay out of this thread.

Let the Admins handle this as it is directed at them.

i cannot say it any simpler.

I did not receive a warning, i was not modded unfairly, this is an issue with Mods ignoring me and me going to the Administrators. The Oms has nothing to do with it.

Now please RESPECT MY REQUEST and stay the hell out, because now you are harrassing me.

Re: Complaint structure?

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:16 am
by Clarkey
Tetrismonkey wrote:Harrassing, no good sir, I am only answering the questions directed at me. As I have stated before, this is mroe or less an Ombudsman issue seeing as you are upset about the way an issue was handled. That being either the outcome of the report or the way a Mod spoke to you or lack there of.

Tetris i am not directing any questions at you.

I am telling you to remain out of this thread. Just because you are a Mod does not me you have a right to whatever you want.

I request you stay out of this thread.

There are no questions directed at you.

NOW PLEASE STAY THE **Filtered** OUT!!!!

Re: Complaint structure?

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:22 am
by Clarkey
Earendil wrote:I would like to know, also how you were able to see the user notes of them?

I asked someone who was not prepared to ignore me.

Re: Complaint structure?

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:27 am
by Clarkey
Earendil wrote:And who was that person then? You can answer in Pm if you want to.

No i don't want to. I see you are attempting to change course of this thread and go after someone that helped me.

Whoever told me the Usernotes were empty does not matter.

Re: Complaint structure?

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:33 am
by Clarkey
Earendil wrote:No, I'm not trying to change the course of this thread, but I would like to know who's leaking information.

And, as it's been said, what solus did is fine, myself and Zera have both talked to him about the situation

it's fine that a GM blatently ignores me when i follow up a report?
It's fine that an ex-admin who claims he is a highly respected person rightfully in the purple group who knows the rules inside out is allowed to abuse me on forums with no punishment?

leaking information lol look at you trying to be the man.

woot 8000 posts!

Re: Complaint structure?

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:36 am
by Clarkey
Tetrismonkey wrote:
Dean Winchester wrote:
EƤrendil wrote:No, I'm not trying to change the course of this thread, but I would like to know who's leaking information.

And, as it's been said, what solus did is fine, myself and Zera have both talked to him about the situation

it's fine that a GM blatently ignores me when i follow up a report?
It's fine that an ex-admin who claims he is a highly respected person rightfully in the purple group who knows the rules inside out is allowed to abuse me on forums with no punishment?

leaking information lol look at you trying to be the man.

woot 8000 posts!



Are you done whinning?

Good. So lets get down to business. It has already been decided that what Solus did was ok. This has the backing of 2/3 Admins. What more does keeping this thread alive and you crying do? Nothing. Im sorry your unhappy about the outcome, but whats done is done. Its been decided and supported at the highest levels.

My god you really are......

Hmm, not at the highest of high levels. :-$

Re: Complaint structure?

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:41 am
by deni
Punishments given are strictly a matter between the administration and the user in question.

Just in RL, you do not get access to a person's rap sheet.

Re: Complaint structure?

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 9:41 am
by Clarkey
You really don't know when to leave this thread do you? This thread would not be half as long if you had stayed out when i asked you to.