Page 2 of 2
Re: Editing of GC rules amidst debate
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:07 am
by Clarkey
I had no idea the debate was going to lead to the rules being updated.
You may have assumed the obvious, but it was not obvious to me. It looked to me as if it had been edited to end the debate on your side. But then i guess that was me also assuming.
You know what they say about assuming.
I guess a lesson here is not to assume. But it doesn't take away the fact that i felt it was wrong the way it was handled. I went about raising the issue in the correct manner, but the admin failed to assist.
Re: Editing of GC rules amidst debate
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:10 am
by deni
Clarkey wrote:I had no idea the debate was going to lead to the rules being updated.
You may have assumed the obvious, but it was not obvious to me. It looked to me as if it had been edited to end the debate on your side. But then i guess that was me also assuming.
You know what they say about assuming.
I guess a lesson here is not to assume. But it doesn't take away the fact that i felt it was wrong the way it was handled. I went about raising the issue in the correct manner, but the admin failed to assist.
This is rather disappointing. I thought our goal here was to act in a way to make the forum better. Not who is right or wrong in a discussion if a topic should stay in the GC or to be moved to General.
Re: Editing of GC rules amidst debate
Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2010 11:17 am
by Clarkey
deni wrote:This is rather disappointing. I thought our goal here was to act in a way to make the forum better. Not who is right or wrong in a discussion if a topic should stay in the GC or to be moved to General.
It is about making the forums better.
But my personal opinion is that the editing should have been made more clear to me during the debate.
If you had said you will clarify it better in the rules that would have been fine.
Re: Editing of GC rules amidst debate
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 4:57 pm
by Jack
Semper wrote:I know that during the discussions over Jack's problems his altering of the spam temple rules during his problems with Gunz was highly frowned upon.
That is bull **Filtered** and you damn well know it, too. I didn't change the rules and I've shown you the 4 year old precedence.
Re: Editing of GC rules amidst debate
Posted: Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:30 pm
by Clarkey
Can a Mod lock this thread please.
It was not and never intended to be about Jack or anything else.
I've finished with this and moved on. Please lock it before the riots start.