StarGateWars Forums

lol... I wouldn't expect anything less from you, bud.

Even if you petition it..it's really not up to you guys unless both sides agree.

Even then, you think a side after X amount of time would accept it? I donno..good idea, but a bit to many loopholes.

Personally, I'd say I'm for it..just to laugh my ass off over the coin toss. I donno though, I think it won't work because of the stubborness of certain individuals.

not a single chance

and we should actualy pay atention to this and do as teh petition says becausse ?

the forum comunity runs FUALL ?
neutrals can veto FUALL HC descisions ?
neutrals have a vote in FUALL or TTF descisions ?
neutrals can tell TTF what to do ?
neutrals run TTF ?

Good idea JMX.
Creative proposal I'd say.

I geuss the petition will be shot down

tho it's a nice subject tho.

my oppinion is this war lasted long yes to long.
But it makes people so bloody hard

you can not decide something like this with such a simple "solution".

did the sides in WW2 one day say oh yea lets just flip a coin and decide the winner and looser. doesnt work like that.

'tis a chuckleworthy concept...

we like it...


maybe you could try getting Forum to do the coin flipping? noone can claim he is anything but neutral... we suspect he would think the idea is funny...

not that we're active on main these days, but we support this idea...

the game needs to move on... this war has caused the war to stagnate...

A new massing list. Thankyou JMX now I have new people to mass.

~Qacol~
Massing list started

R8 TDL wrote:you can not decide something like this with such a simple "solution".

did the sides in WW2 one day say oh yea lets just flip a coin and decide the winner and looser. doesnt work like that.

i cant believe you just compared ww2 where many lost there lives

to a text based game

Snipes wrote:

R8 TDL wrote:you can not decide something like this with such a simple "solution".

did the sides in WW2 one day say oh yea lets just flip a coin and decide the winner and looser. doesnt work like that.

i cant believe you just compared ww2 where many lost there lives

to a text based game

i compared it in principle.

yeh but in WW2 people could be bought from a market,and and 250k+ people wernt ready to fight every new day wer they, so this war will keep going unless something finally happens

are you afraid to put things to a truly random chance?

do not all parts know that neither side has truly "won"?

the only people who have won, are the ones not in the war...

If you really care about the 'server war' ( A very pretentious name ), then pick a side and fight it


Be realistic, it wont end until some future game update makes wars winnable, or unless the 2 sides can agree on a winning condition/judge.