Descension Question

[Empy]

It's not like the AP makes a huge difference anyways >_>

[knight]

I ascended thinking logically that I would reascend on the ascended server (and get main bonuses back)... stupidly forgetting that this game doesnt follow logic.

Again, something they should of written somewhere at least to warn that ascended while descended is a large waste...

so let this serve as a warning to others!

I am all for descension... i just think yeah, as you say they should stop you from ascending again, or at least if you ascend you reascend.

This is how in the past people would get around the deascended. Admin took the loop hole out.

Being descended should have penalties, otherwise no one would play that server.

[fourtwozero]

err loop hole?

are you mad? if in top 5% takes 3 weeks to get Gnr for ascension... top 2% or whatever still takes a week... i dont see the loophole? a loop hole usually implies a loop... however even if you are in the top 2% its still a week minimum to build it up. And considering the fact if you were descended, its likely you are at war with someone, so staying in the top 2% is going to be a feat worthy of the reward of reascending, and you still suffer a week of being descended.

And if you save the gnr to ascend when you have been descended, so what, you get 4 days of ppt on ascended, then you can just get descended again? there goes your saved gnr, you get to buy 4 days of ascension with it. Seems fair.

i dont think it was well thought out if it used to work that way and admin changed it... and am amazed if anyone thinks its better how it is now... I mean really? can someone explain how this can be exploited?

[knight]

err loop hole?

are you mad? if in top 5% takes 3 weeks to get Gnr for ascension... top 2% or whatever still takes a week... i dont see the loophole? a loop hole usually implies a loop... however even if you are in the top 2% its still a week minimum to build it up. And considering the fact if you were descended, its likely you are at war with someone, so staying in the top 2% is going to be a feat worthy of the reward of reascending, and you still suffer a week of being descended.

And if you save the gnr to ascend when you have been descended, so what, you get 4 days of ppt on ascended, then you can just get descended again? there goes your saved gnr, you get to buy 4 days of ascension with it. Seems fair.

i dont think it was well thought out if it used to work that way and admin changed it... and am amazed if anyone thinks its better how it is now... I mean really? can someone explain how this can be exploited?

What if they already had the 1k G&R?

Glory and Reputation Score ... 4,838