Page 2 of 3
Re: Multi Accounts
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:48 am
by Deerslayer
there was an implication at one point waves ago...and its still being brought up. thats the thing. I DON'T LIKE BEING ACCUSED, I take offense.
Re: Multi Accounts
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:51 am
by Scenester
Ah so basicly I can create 3 more accounts now, one of my dad, my mom n my brother, and then just say I dont play on them but they are, and they just happen to have thesame enemies.
Awesome.
Re: Multi Accounts
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 5:58 am
by Deerslayer
yup you can do that...as long as they have the ip exception. its a little retarded isn't it.
Re: Multi Accounts
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 6:01 am
by Scenester
Deerslayer wrote:yup you can do that...as long as they have the ip exception. its a little retarded isn't it.
Foxy proxy ftw?
But then again those accs where this topic is about have no ip differences...
Re: Multi Accounts
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:03 am
by Neimenljivi
I'm not even gonna bother reading all of this nonsense.. All I gathered was a proof that someone is probably a multi and then yada yada yada brother, old account yada yada yada excuses. We'll just have to wait and see what the big J does I guess..
~Jack
Re: Multi Accounts
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 9:54 am
by Sir Balor
MR atkinson is no multi'er
its quite deluded to think anybody but the supposed 'big' quantum players multi
i gave him the reins of the Q alliance i started because i trust him and respect his skill
thats real skill not 'ability to make more than 1 account' or 'ability to throw money at a free game'.
Re: Multi Accounts
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:47 am
by EnVy!
sigh... new era. same problems...
Re: Multi Accounts
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 10:57 am
by S1eepy
Sir Balor wrote:its quite deluded to think anybody but the supposed 'big' quantum players multi
so your saying the players who have proved themselves over many years of playing, and experimenting with every aspect of the game to be capable of being successful, are more likely to use a multi to succeed? When compared to a new player, who lacks the experiance and contacts, but does well none-the-less?
It would seem to me, you have a flaw in your thinking.
Re: Multi Accounts
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:01 am
by EnVy!
s1eepy you could be a lawyer
. good point
Re: Multi Accounts
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:05 am
by Tictac
S1eepy wrote:Sir Balor wrote:its quite deluded to think anybody but the supposed 'big' quantum players multi
so your saying the players who have proved themselves over many years of playing, and experimenting with every aspect of the game to be capable of being successful, are more likely to use a multi to succeed? When compared to a new player, who lacks the experiance and contacts, but does well none-the-less?
It would seem to me, you have a flaw in your thinking.
ah but to play devils advocate...can you vouch for how every "big/good" got to be this way?
Re: Multi Accounts
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:15 am
by S1eepy
He'll no, I'm not saying every good player has been legit. But they have a lot more experiance than a new player.. Some1 new is more likely to need to resort to these types of measures to compete effectiely against more experienced players.
But Balor seems to believe otherwise
Re: Multi Accounts
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:20 am
by Tictac
S1eepy wrote:He'll no, I'm not saying every good player has been legit. But they have a lot more experiance than a new player.. Some1 new is more likely to need to resort to these types of measures to compete effectiely against more experienced players.
But Balor seems to believe otherwise
I can see where you'e coming from and on one hand believe it to be true, but also an experienced player wants to do well every time and is very competitive so
mightdo whatever it takes, where as a new player has no expectations and is just happy to see how things go
Re: Multi Accounts
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:31 am
by S1eepy
Agreed, and that is why most new players are not competing with the more experienced player in their first wave. Those that do very well, usualy have a reason behind it.. Such as they are old players returning or they could have an experienced player mentoring them.
But when one of these new players does well without an obvious reason, then it comes to light that three accounts have been logging on from his location.. Obvious alarm bells ring.. And for good reason.
Re: Multi Accounts
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 11:35 am
by Tictac
S1eepy wrote:Agreed, and that is why most new players are not competing with the more experienced player in their first wave. Those that do very well, usualy have a reason behind it.. Such as they are old players returning or they could have an experienced player mentoring them.
But when one of these new players does well without an obvious reason, then it comes to light that three accounts have been logging on from his location.. Obvious alarm bells ring.. And for good reason.
all to true unfortunately...but tbh when you play enough mmorpg games they all become pretty much the same...a new player here might not mean they are new to the game type.
I've played main for 5 years, but this is my first real kick at quantum (although did play chaos for a few waves many a wave ago) seems I decided to really play this at a bad time lol the AMS is probably going to be the deciding factor at the end of the day...and the winner in theory should come from the alliance with most members, seeing as they can work together to nuke anyone lol
Re: Multi Accounts
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 1:36 pm
by S1eepy
But there are some things that take time to learn, which is why I made the UP calc (which I have fixed for this era, just not had a chance to upload yet) the server will not survive without new players, so the transition from "noob player" to good player should be made as easy as possible. (even if going from "good" to "pro" is hard) but what we don't need, is more feeders/abusers/multiers. Which in my book, Atkinson is, at the LEAST abusing his brothers account to do damage to his enemy.
But it's up to admin to acton what he decides.. If he can be bothered to decide either way.