Page 2 of 2
Re: getting a board warning
Posted: Tue May 04, 2010 9:11 pm
by Jack
I am not about to dig through thousands of hours of logs to prove something I don't have to.
Like Knight said, I was there, I saw him tell you. I also saw other people tell you. Case closed.
Re: getting a board warning
Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 5:23 am
by Mordack
Wakko wrote:Clarkey, I'm sure the Oms can handle this themselves.
Quite honestly, I have no interest in Clarkey's opinion whatsoever. I won't be reading any of his posts in this section unless the case concerns him directly.
Re: getting a board warning
Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 9:18 am
by Hitchkok
Mordack wrote:Wakko wrote:Clarkey, I'm sure the Oms can handle this themselves.
Quite honestly, I have no interest in Clarkey's opinion whatsoever. I won't be reading any of his posts in this section unless the case concerns him directly.
that's somewhat biased, isn't it?
Re: getting a board warning
Posted: Wed May 05, 2010 9:21 am
by Clarkey
Hitchkok wrote:Mordack wrote:Wakko wrote:Clarkey, I'm sure the Oms can handle this themselves.
Quite honestly, I have no interest in Clarkey's opinion whatsoever. I won't be reading any of his posts in this section unless the case concerns him directly.
that's somewhat biased, isn't it?
I can see where you are coming from, however, the Ombudsperson has no obligation to take in anyone's opinion on matters besides the staff and the user(s) involved.
So as this issue is ont directly involving me then he has no obligation to listen.
However, the statement Mordack made provides me with no confidence of being treated fairly and neutrally in my own Ombudsperson issue.