Page 2 of 2

Re: StarGateWars - 'Original Style'

Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 7:47 am
by ~Sabaku no Gaara~
Guys let's stop arguing and talk with jason about this

the meeting is tomorrow , right?

Re: StarGateWars - 'Original Style'

Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 7:47 am
by Ra
~Sabaku no Gaara~ wrote:
Sarevok wrote:I'm not sure how far back you want to go. Or are you mostly talking about races etc. That I'm all for.

MaxSterling wrote:I think the ever decreasing number of active players is proof how crappy this game is. When I started playing, this game was half-way decent and had 700-800 players online nearly all the time. Now I just play to waste time and maintain my account... but even my time farming has gone down since I finished ascending. Instead of 30T/day, I'm only spending time to farm 20-25T/day. More and more of my free time is spent playing Halo : Reach instead of GW.
And what would you do to improve this "crappy game"


If jason talks with MGM i'm sure that we'll have the races names back

You can be any race you want.. be it Goa'uld/Asgard/Ancient/Hamburger..

Re: StarGateWars - 'Original Style'

Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 7:48 am
by Sarevok
If you call it that, then so be it. All i'm trying to do is get you to elaborate more for people. And throw possible loop holes/bugs that i see to be changed

Ra wrote:You can be any race you want.. be it Goa'uld/Asgard/Ancient/Hamburger..
Which is pointless, just what i think. I'd rather have a meaning behind the race i choose, rather then whatever i feel like

Re: StarGateWars - 'Original Style'

Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 7:51 am
by Ra
Sarevok wrote:If you call it that, then so be it. All i'm trying to do is get you to elaborate more for people. And throw possible loop holes/bugs that i see to be changed

Ra wrote:You can be any race you want.. be it Goa'uld/Asgard/Ancient/Hamburger..
Which is pointless, just what i think. I'd rather have a meaning behind the race i choose, rather then whatever i feel like

Ohhh, are you guys referring to like unit names? I mean techs and weapons are still race based, I think.

Re: StarGateWars - 'Original Style'

Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 7:53 am
by Sarevok
More race names. Back to where it was Goa'uld vs Replicator vs Asguard vs Tauri. And the names etc associated with them

Re: StarGateWars - 'Original Style'

Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 7:55 am
by knight
The settlement that Jason got is what we have now. There will be no more re-negotiation.

Jason is one man fighting thousands of lawyers. ](*,)

There is no way to win. :cry:

Re: StarGateWars - 'Original Style'

Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 10:31 pm
by ~Sabaku no Gaara~
knight37 wrote:The settlement that Jason got is what we have now. There will be no more re-negotiation.

Jason is one man fighting thousands of lawyers. ](*,)

There is no way to win. :cry:


not so cool... not at all

Re: StarGateWars - 'Original Style'

Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 10:49 pm
by Q Man
yeah, jason V MGM? :-k

i know where i'd put my money.
but i do believe if we can keep jason producing more updates it will all work well. i mean like, the houses update should, if implimented properly (with i believe it will be) then it should help improve activity, even if temporarily.

Re: StarGateWars - 'Original Style'

Posted: Thu May 13, 2010 11:27 pm
by Sarevok
If we can get back to relying on our armys, instead of on stat boosts, that'll bring players, new and old, to the game.

Re: StarGateWars - 'Original Style'

Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 5:23 pm
by CABAL
AdminJ is making a profit out of SGW without prior arrangement with MGM.
So the only way to get StarGW back, is for him to remove $$$ spending completely. Which, will not only make the game attract new players, but will also make it a better place.

Re: StarGateWars - 'Original Style'

Posted: Sat May 15, 2010 8:40 pm
by Sarevok
That won't stop player to player transfers. But your right, you can hardly sue someone for using your name, if it's not to their personal gain. Since they could just claim it was free advertising for them.
Though If there product was named similar, they could sue for potential loss of profit :(