StarGateWars Forums

However, Brdavs, as much as I see this irony, it's not -yet- really the same. It has similarities indeed. But talibans bombed willingly this buddha. Americans deteriorate this site in long term, which isn't acceptable either, but the way and purpose is different.
It's damaging due to sitting troops ignorance, while for talibans, it was bombing due to ignorance. I'm sure soldiers don't try to damage it knowingly due to some silly ideology, unlike those idiotic talibans. If these soldiers damage it consciously, then shame on them!

Oh come on. Jarheads are what the name implies. Menevolance, hate for the natives, stress and/or just plain entertainment. Result is predicatble by now is it not.

If they dont have reservations in killing or humiliating civilians and small animals and then putting the stuff on youtube than you can be sure some sandnegroe heritage wont give them much pause. There was a case not long ago when a UN peacekeeper from coroatia stationed in W.Sahara wrote "x croamry" over some 6000 year old cave painting. The guy was muppet enough to do that, sign his name so they could track him down no less, and all this in a far less demanding a situation than that in Afg.

Infact I can show more understanding for the taliban. Atleast they blow those up knowing what they were doing and for a specific, albeit noncondonable, reason. AA appars to be a bunch of ignorant muppets, from the top brass that thought stationing there was a good idea down, and whats more thats apparently supposed to be justification to boot.

On a positive note, NATO now has more troops thare than the USSR did. And thats not even counting the contractors. Another hillariously ironic thing when you think about it.

Brdavs wrote:

However, Brdavs, as much as I see this irony, it's not -yet- really the same. It has similarities indeed. But talibans bombed willingly this buddha. Americans deteriorate this site in long term, which isn't acceptable either, but the way and purpose is different.
It's damaging due to sitting troops ignorance, while for talibans, it was bombing due to ignorance. I'm sure soldiers don't try to damage it knowingly due to some silly ideology, unlike those idiotic talibans. If these soldiers damage it consciously, then shame on them!

Oh come on. Jarheads are what the name implies. Menevolance, hate for the natives, stress and/or just plain entertainment. Result is predicatble by now is it not.

If they dont have reservations in killing or humiliating civilians and small animals and then putting the stuff on youtube than you can be sure some sandnegroe heritage wont give them much pause. There was a case not long ago when a UN peacekeeper from coroatia stationed in W.Sahara wrote "x croamry" over some 6000 year old cave painting. The guy was muppet enough to do that, sign his name so they could track him down no less, and all this in a far less demanding a situation than that in Afg.

Infact I can show more understanding for the taliban. Atleast they blow those up knowing what they were doing and for a specific, albeit noncondonable, reason. AA appars to be a munch of ignorant muppets, from the top brass that thought stationing there was a good idea down, and whats more thats apparently supposed to be justification to boot.

I got to agree that launching "pigs" (to use Juliette accurate term) in an unknown area full of people considered as the "enemy", they will not have much respect to anything related directly or indirectly to them. Thinking before acting and all that stuff. Facepalm worthy. If only their superiors briefed (proper term?) them about what to do/what not to do, and include that in the "no no", maybe, yes maybe, they wouldn't have acted as idiots.

But well, they are probably not all like that?

You really are quite the bigot aren't you apophis? I used to think you had a good head on your shoulder's.... maybe you recently had some emotional trauma

Leg Apophis wrote:I'm not discriminating... your dumb if you say that, I just don't think gay people should have the same right's as heterosexuals.

I'm not dircriminating... your dumb if you say tha, I just think the Muslims should GTHO or act like us christians do........

I'm soo ausome.... in my head... and your a lefty hippie retard if you think different

Thriller wrote:You really are quite the bigot aren't you apophis? I used to think you had a good head on your shoulder's.... maybe you recently had some emotional trauma

Leg Apophis wrote:I'm not discriminating... your dumb if you say that, I just don't think gay people should have the same right's as heterosexuals.

I'm not dircriminating... your dumb if you say tha, I just think the Muslims should GTHO or act like us christians do........

I'm soo ausome.... in my head... and your a lefty hippie retard if you think different

You are insulting me greatly to imply I have such a retarded and patheticly idiotic way of expressing myself..

So I take it that you consider talibans as regular muslims? Nice to know, nice to know...who's the one full of prejudices eh? Oh that should be you! Shame on you to shout when someone tells what everyone thinks inside about extremists and run as fast as possible to defend them in the name of great no idea what. Stop being such a "dhimmi" Thriller.

Emotional trauma? Are you smoking pot or something?

Leg Apophis wrote:I'm not discriminating... you're dumb if you say that, I just don't think gay people should have the same rights as heterosexuals.

I'm not discriminating... you're dumb if you say that, I just think the Muslims should GTHO or act like us christians do........

I'm soo awesome.... in my head... and your a lefty hippie retard if you think differently

And don't spare me the excuse of "don't dig others' posting language", english is your first language, so you got no excuse for that hehe..
I felt like correcting this horrible to my eyes text, if you don't mind (well, just corrected the countless mistakes, the content is beyond hope of repair).

@last part: I'm according to you a "racist far right extremist neo nazi homophobic ultra christian nwo worshipper" (blah blah blah boring *yawns loudly*) if I think differently as you, pot calling kettle black eh?

Oh well, when one fails greatly to say something they resort to insults and personal digs...typical. You had basically zero arguements against me when you entered this thread, but felt like trolling a bit by lowering the discussion level to "pigs" level (to use again this funny expression). In one post the discussion sink beyond hope. Always easy to lower a discussion, but harder to increase it's level. So bad you decided to chose the cheap way. Oh well, there's always a need for trolls isn't it?

LOL

yah okay their buddy....

i put words in your mouth and then you tried to put words in mine. but, at least mine was funny.

And if i don't put proper punctuation, articulation, spelling, allusion, allomorphs, euphemism, or syntax; i couldn't GAFF

Your fixating to much on the muslim part. The people who are trying to kill you are mostly uneducated sheople whose spiritual and cultural beliefs were preyed upon by power hungry ass hats. These guys get off every time a fatwah leaves their mouth and they like to get off alot(who doesn't?).

I wish they didn't have to die. They have basically been turned to cannon fodder in the belief they are doing what's right and I can respect that. Their religion isn't the cause of their violence, it's just a tool for control in their soceityl; which can be used to the good or bad. ( I look at it like putting down an aggressively stray dog, they just didn't know better and it's probably his masters fault)

Just another case of the strong preying on the weak... like your political devotion to your party line.

Thriller wrote:LOL

yah okay their buddy....

i put words in your mouth and then you tried to put words in mine. but, at least mine was funny.

Of course it was, illusion of few seconds to include me among the group of brainless pigs due to my apparent incapacity to form a basic sentence (in spite of not respecting the usual "code" of satire).

And if i don't put proper punctuation, articulation, spelling, allusion, allomorphs, euphemism, or syntax; i couldn't GAFF

Usually, man, when one uses such means in their criticism/mocking, it's because the person already got troubles making proper words. To emphaze the problem. As far as I know, I'm not (anymore..) top food material for grammar/typo digging...I could point you out people whose english is meant to be their first language, and who could be targets of such satirical striking.

Your fixating to much on the muslim part. The people who are trying to kill you are mostly uneducated sheople whose spiritual and cultural beliefs were preyed upon by power hungry ass hats. These guys get off every time a fatwah leaves their mouth and they like to get off alot(who doesn't?).

Where did I say that those people represent the true islam? Ah, I think you might refer to the part of one of my post where I said the exact total opposite of what you claim I say (thus why I firstly didn't get where I did say that, then I thought let's consider exact opposite, and I should find out then)
[spoiler]

Leg Apophis wrote:Anyone who followed late SG1 seasons might recognize in the Ori priors the fundamentalists from various religions who reinterpret holy texts to their own needs and purposes to twist it for their seek of dominance. I'm sure the writers of the series didn't do it innoncently, and did it as a criticism towards various fanatisms across the world, which existed, and still exist. This is a good illustration of why fundamentalists cannot be seen as the true holders of a cult they pretend representing.

[/spoiler]

I wish they didn't have to die. They have basically been turned to cannon fodder in the belief they are doing what's right and I can respect that. Their religion isn't the cause of their violence, it's just a tool for control in their soceityl; which can be used to the good or bad. ( I look at it like putting down an aggressively stray dog, they just didn't know better and it's probably his masters fault)

You say exactly the same as I did.

Just another case of the strong preying on the weak... like your political devotion to your party line.

No comment. Really..


PS: "hippie leftist". Well, if you are in favour of legalizing weed, you are a hippie, and since you are in favour of homosexual mariage, you are a leftist?
Happy that I accused you of that?

Leg Apophis wrote:PS: "hippie leftist". Well, if you are in favour of legalizing weed, you are a hippie, and since you are in favour of homosexual mariage, you are a leftist?
Happy that I accused you of that?

See that, none of those things equals the other... meditate on this you should

And i didn't learn English until I was 9... yah damn frog

Thriller wrote:

Leg Apophis wrote:PS: "hippie leftist". Well, if you are in favour of legalizing weed, you are a hippie, and since you are in favour of homosexual mariage, you are a leftist?
Happy that I accused you of that?

See that, none of those thing equals the other... meditate on this you should

Spending my time on more important/interesting/useful things than that, I will.

Im just trying to help you out with your apparent lack of comprehension skills

I think those smileys illustrate even better than words what I think about it..

I already know you don't understand. That's what i said; you don't need smiley's to illus.....

ah forget it, i think your too far gone

Isnt this thread about the justification of the U.S war against their oppositions?
I find it funny however that the U.S are terrible fighters and kill their own men, where as Australians, when they boosted the U.S's strike force with our own troops only managed to receive 2-3 casualties which either were in combat or faulty weaponry.
Nonetheless the U.S had some very dodgy justifications for waging war with other countries.

Leg Apophis wrote:

Leg Apophis wrote:I'm not discriminating... you're dumb if you say that, I just don't think gay people should have the same rights as heterosexuals.

I'm not discriminating... you're dumb if you say that, I just think the Muslims should GTHO or act like us christians do........

I'm soo awesome.... in my head... and your a lefty hippie retard if you think differently

And don't spare me the excuse of "don't dig others' posting language", english is your first language, so you got no excuse for that hehe..
I felt like correcting this horrible to my eyes text, if you don't mind (well, just corrected the countless mistakes, the content is beyond hope of repair).

interesting to see, that while in your own post you state the irrelevancy of speeling to content, you still present this as a legitimate rebuttle.
confused (not to say the H word....) much, pops?

and, BTW: don't dig others' posting language".
hey, you asked for it.

Leg Apophis wrote:And don't spare me the excuse of "don't dig others' posting language"

going slightly off-track, ain't we all?!

[spoiler]

Hitchkok wrote:

Leg Apophis wrote:And don't spare me the excuse of "don't dig others' posting language", english is your first language, so you got no excuse for that hehe..
I felt like correcting this horrible to my eyes text, if you don't mind (well, just corrected the countless mistakes, the content is beyond hope of repair).

interesting to see, that while in your own post you state the irrelevancy of speeling to content, you still present this as a legitimate rebuttle.
confused (not to say the H word....) much, pops?

and, BTW: don't dig others' posting language".
hey, you asked for it.

Leg Apophis wrote:And don't spare me the excuse of "don't dig others' posting language"

[/spoiler]
Yes "don't", or "do not", like I posted? Correcting what's already correct?

Nonsense+Nonsense= Nonsense. (another way to describe it: Not reading before posting+assuming things= nonsense)

Contribution to this thread? None. That's what I thought.

[KMA]Avenger wrote:going slightly off-track, ain't we all?!

They have nothing (more) to say on the subject, so they try to derail it by bringing others like me offtopic, where they might have something to say...