StarGateWars Forums

odji nsu wrote:cheers,, and i finally found what the warning is for, and besides the word calling a female dog is the worst thing in it,, and thank you so much fem i love the song its perfect for me

glad you liked it.. was only intent to brighten ppls day.. it brightened mine when it was sent to me

I cant access it, can someone find it on youtube and pm me a link

sent

found it for Odji

Rottenking wrote:I cant access it, can someone find it on youtube and pm me a link

Honestly it's not warn worthy.

then it's easy, make a Table where Mod's can recognize their mistake and where they should post the appologies msg:

like an ex:
I XXXXXXXXXX, the BIG Boss of MOD's team, retrive the warning gaven to:
- ƒemme ƒatale
due to this reason:

video link

and, the MOD:
XXXXXXXXXX

receive 1 Warning, due to this fact.

when his activity will be revised, this Mistakes will balance the decision if he remains or not MOD's.

Also, you should have a rule: at 10-20-30 Warnings for a MOD, automate release from duty.

**Filtered**'

if it's filtered, it's warn worthy, be it on a third party site, or a picture.

it doesn't matter, this trend has been in place since i was head admin 2-3 years ago. warn is legit.

Indeed. Your are responsible for the content of your posts.
This is something you have been told before, and it's rather petty to protest against a warning for something you know you broke the rules with.

Sounds to me like you're just trying to get the Ombudsman to reverse yet another warning.. the motto of the office isn't "You ask, we reverse" contrary to what appears to be popular belief. (I suppose the Oms will make it clear if that is their actual motto?)

Juliette wrote:Indeed. Your are responsible for the content of your posts.
This is something you have been told before, and it's rather petty to protest against a warning for something you know you broke the rules with.

Sounds to me like you're just trying to get the Ombudsman to reverse yet another warning.. the motto of the office isn't "You ask, we reverse" contrary to what appears to be popular belief. (I suppose the Oms will make it clear if that is their actual motto?)

actually not at all... I wasn't not aware of the so called offending word until Clarkey pointed it out to me (via private pm)

It was not posted to cause offense or to offend anyone but simply as a light hearted stress relief that I found it to be as did Odji.

and I have never asked for a warning I've received to be reversed before,

I just think a full blown warning is OTT. A verbal would have done the job.

Now now, let's not make a precedent and keep the warning.
Also Femme, why do you post a link to a vid where you don't know the lyrics off?

dastupy wrote:Now now, let's not make a precedent and keep the warning.
Also Femme, why do you post a link to a vid where you don't know the lyrics off?

A precedent? viewtopic.php?f=101&t=106408&start=15 strange (if you are wondering, look at the last post in that thread).

Clarkey wrote:

dastupy wrote:Now now, let's not make a precedent and keep the warning.
Also Femme, why do you post a link to a vid where you don't know the lyrics off?

A precedent? viewtopic.php?f=101&t=106408&start=15 strange (if you are wondering, look at the last post in that thread).

sometimes I could just cuddles you to death *cuddles* ...

hope the Omns hasn't changed his view on that word... and hope those that have diberately masked that word in the past will now get a Full on warning too..

@ Dastupy, so you know the words to every song you have ever listened to or been sent the link to? I listened to it a couple of times.. thought it was funny and thought others would also.

It was not a torrent of profanity aimed at anyone or about anyone... those that have enjoyed it like I did Im glad it made you happy.. those in some remote way offended I am sorry.

ƒemme ƒatale

let them warn you, They could warn all of us. It's a dead end.
It's their rules. Their Forum. Dead END....

We are just the ones who want to be on forum, cause if we weren't probably we won't be playing to much SGW.

So, you see, they never say: Sorry.

The personal view of the ombudsmen if the word in question should be or not on the filter, is of no concern. Just as my own personal opinion does not matter.

What matters though is that the word IS currently on the filter.

Thus posting a link containing that word is a warnable offense.

It does not matter that the word itself is not posted directly on the forum - signatures are not posted on the forum but only linked and having a filtered word in them would trigger the same mod action - a warning and removal of the file in question.

Clarkey wrote:

dastupy wrote:Now now, let's not make a precedent and keep the warning.
Also Femme, why do you post a link to a vid where you don't know the lyrics off?

A precedent? viewtopic.php?f=101&t=106408&start=15 strange (if you are wondering, look at the last post in that thread).

I have to ask, do you just remember everything anyone has ever said, or do you file all posts and cross reference them, or just randomly search to find your awsome quptes fr

om years ago?

P.s i dont have to log into a third party site to view sigs

when you have to log into the third party site you take away all responcibility here, as you then have to abide by their terms